D
Drawmack
Guest
Not all of them, those were the ones pertinent to this thread and so the only ones I discussed here.And your problems stem from the handling of the case in Brazil?
Not all of them, those were the ones pertinent to this thread and so the only ones I discussed here.And your problems stem from the handling of the case in Brazil?
We are also all responsible to find out the truth and to act on it. We aren’t to act on a doubtful conscious. God has written it into our hearts, so even if one didn’t claim to know the truth, their conscious would act in ways to tell them and therefore they would have doubts.Sure they could go to those sites. But Francis said, “it is quite clear to everyone that rape is a mortal sin, but not clear to everyone that abortion is,” [My boldface.]
So, if ignorance of the gavity of abortion can survive the internet, it seems similar ignorance about artificial birth control could also survive.
It appears that way to me from the other threads where I have seen others and myself explain something to you, and yet, you still ask the same thing or say the same thing later. It appears as if you didn’t even read what someone provided for you.Allhers: Sometimes that still happens to some people who don’t know the truth, it looks to me like **you try to misinform **more than that you are trying to seek truth. It’s hard to tell someimes on the internet what one’s true intentions are.
Could you tell us where I am misinforming?
So, where do I misinform? That’s a harsh accusation. What specific misinformation?It appears that way to me from the other threads where I have seen others and myself explain something to you, and yet, you still ask the same thing or say the same thing later. It appears as if you didn’t even read what someone provided for you.
Some of us actually take the time to research things for you and others and then it just looks like you didn’t even care enough to acknowledge it by saying a few posts later, or in another thread the same thing again. Perhaps you are just looking for opinions, but its best to seek the truth and that is why I suggested the sites I did. Happy reading.
If you are sincere, read them, if you’re just looking for opinons, everybody has one, and sometimes they are wrong. Not everybody even on a Catholic site is Catholic, as you well know, they don’t have to be. Even most Catholics don’t understand it all, we are, as a good Priest I know once said, “students for life.”![]()
I am sorry you did not stay in the Catholic Church to work these issues out. What I found was that when I had some problem with a teaching it would generally resolve itself with prayer, meditation, and research, but oddly enough, the prayer and meditation were often more of a factor than the research. Some questions were answered quickly, and others took a long time, but they were all answered, and now I have confidence that any questions I have will be answered.Not all of them, those were the ones pertinent to this thread and so the only ones I discussed here.
I am glad that you have such confidence and faith in your religion. This is the reason that I will talk about my problems with the Catholic Church here, among a mostly Catholic audience, but when I am with Protestants my response to any questions about Catholicism or why I left the Catholic Church is, “Catholics firmly believe that they are doing God’s will, they firmly believe in what they profess and teach. If you would like to know what they teach I will be more than happy to loan you one of my Catechisms and a Catholic Bible, but I will not speak badly of them or their teachings.”I am sorry you did not stay in the Catholic Church to work these issues out. What I found was that when I had some problem with a teaching it would generally resolve itself with prayer, meditation, and research, but oddly enough, the prayer and meditation were often more of a factor than the research. Some questions were answered quickly, and others took a long time, but they were all answered, and now I have confidence that any questions I have will be answered.
it’s good that you are continuing the grapple with those questions, and I hope that you will find answers for them.I am glad that you have such confidence and faith in your religion. This is the reason that I will talk about my problems with the Catholic Church here, among a mostly Catholic audience, but when I am with Protestants my response to any questions about Catholicism or why I left the Catholic Church is, “Catholics firmly believe that they are doing God’s will, they firmly believe in what they profess and teach. If you would like to know what they teach I will be more than happy to loan you one of my Catechisms and a Catholic Bible, but I will not speak badly of them or their teachings.”
In this particular situation, I understand why many people react with visceral disgust at the actions of the stepfather and consider it worse.The fact that something is an excommunicatable offense does not mean that its the worst act a person could commit, but that sometimes people forget how bad that particular act is.
The very fact that people still believe that killing the unborn children was not as heinous as the rapes shows the need for the canonical penalty. Everybody understands that the rapist needs to repent or burn in the fires of Hell eternally. People get that.
But people do not get that abortion is also a mortal sin, for which one will burn in the fires of Hell eternally if they do not repent.
Both states are easily resolved: one has only to confess and *perhaps *publicly admit and abjure the error.
Perhaps this is why abortion is an automatic excommunication, so that everyone willIn this particular situation, I understand why many people react with visceral disgust at the actions of the stepfather and consider it worse.
My biggest problem is that without the actions of the step-father the abortions could not have happened. He is, or his actions are as the case may be, the root cause of the abortions. So why wasn’t he excommunicated as well? I could voice my opinion, but I won’t I’ll leave it as a question for the reader to consider.Perhaps this is why abortion is an automatic excommunication, so that everyone will understand why God reacts with profound disgust at the murdering of an innocent life.
The problem that you don’t seem to see is that some things are known to put a person in a state of mortal sin, and others are not. The rapist is not in a better state vis a vis the Church than those whose excommunication was announced–he is in a state of mortal sin.My biggest problem is that without the actions of the step-father the abortions could not have happened. He is, or his actions are as the case may be, the root cause of the abortions. So why wasn’t he excommunicated as well? I could voice my opinion, but I won’t I’ll leave it as a question for the reader to consider.
That makes no logical sense.My biggest problem is that without the actions of the step-father the abortions could not have happened. He is, or his actions are as the case may be, the root cause of the abortions.
You can take my comments any way you want, I really don’t care what mindset you wish to ascribe to me.The problem that you don’t seem to see is that some things are known to put a person in a state of mortal sin, and others are not. The rapist is not in a better state vis a vis the Church than those whose excommunication was announced–he is in a state of mortal sin.
At this point, you do not seem to be trying to understand the Church’s point of view as much as you are trying to use the point to paint the Catholic Church in a bad light. I could be misunderstanding what you are doing, but that is the impression that I am beginning to have from the way your comments are worded and what is shown in your comments about the general trend of your thinking.
Can you get an abortion without being pregnant? As I have said multiple times on this thread. You can justify the actions of the Catholic Church anyway you need to in order to justify your faith in the primacy of the magisterium. I won’t!That makes no logical sense.
His actions directly resulted in a pregnancy, not an abortion.
The root cause of the abortion was the choice to abort.
Nope. But you also cannot run over someone without a car. Shall we blame General Motors for hit and run accidents?Can you get an abortion without being pregnant?
And rightly so. The church acted in an appropriate manner here.As I have said multiple times on this thread. You can justify the actions of the Catholic Church anyway you need to in order to justify your faith in the primacy of the magisterium.
You claim the church teaches something that the church does not.I won’t!
Perhaps because those of the pro-abortion side of the argument do not want anyone attempting to prevent the abortion. Granting the father some power in the decision counters this “freedom” to kill.RE EDUCATE:
REAL MEN PROTECT AND PROVIDE FOR THEIR WOMEN AND CHILDREN.
Why is it that I read so very little about the FATHER’S ROLE in preventing abortions?
I would like to point out that a couple posts ago vz called abortion a choice and that now they are refusing to use the term pro-choice. Which is it vz, is it a chioce or not?Perhaps because those of the pro-abortion side of the argument do not want anyone attempting to prevent the abortion. Granting the father some power in the decision counters this “freedom” to kill.