E
EasterJoy
Guest
If my husband had not wanted a Mass, we wouldn’t have had one. He wisely convinced me that this was not only something that would make next to no difference to him but probably lots of difference to my family (who were wisely not adding their two cents) and, in retrospect, more difference to me than I might think.I agree that it’s different if the husband-to-be was asking. Valid, non-valid both are likely meaningless to the OP. How to draw a reasonable boundary with the mother-in-law was answered early on. The OP acknowledged as much. Someone pointed out (maybe around p. 3) that there are theological discussions worth having especially if someone pulls this thread up in the future.
EasterJoy, I didn’t realize this hit a bit close to home for you. I get the sense that your husband went through the process to get your dispensation because it was important to you. I think that’s admirable and loving. I didn’t sense that dispensation was important to the OP’s intended which led me down a different path.
The OP might easily have been thinking along the same lines: that is, we know it is important to your family, whether or not they presume to say so, the day might come when it is important to you and harder to accomplish than it is now, and I don’t mind if we do. This is not a big deal to do right by the Church, so let’s just do it right. The Church does not teach that it is a sacrilege for a Catholic to follow canon law. Let’s do it, then.