G
gracepoole
Guest
I’d take it as a sign of the culture of silence that’s being maintained.If someone remains vague, no details, no names, I would take it to be hyperbole at best and fear mongering at worst.
I’d take it as a sign of the culture of silence that’s being maintained.If someone remains vague, no details, no names, I would take it to be hyperbole at best and fear mongering at worst.
The reason I lay these stories bare now it because of my strong belief that this pervasive dysfunctional culture is at the deepest core of the cover-up, abuse, and scandal of all forms–not just sexual–that continue to be rampant in these church circles.
[…]
Sexual secrecy is the currency in the church and learning how to use it is almost treated like an art form in seminaries. This culture has been woven into the fabric of Roman Catholic clergy culture for centuries. The church’s strict and absolute regulations around sex and sexuality which themselves are created and promulgated by the very men who breach them provide a perfect cover for those whose own sense of sexuality is without boundaries, regulation, or integration. Sexual secrecy and blackmail is the clergy’s bitcoin by which position, power, and control are bartered in the shadows, costing children and adults alike their faith, their safety and well being — and in some cases, their lives.
With this, I don’t agree. Popes should serve for lifeThen the Pope can himself retire
But it is about guilt, the guilt of the sex abusers (be they pederast or pedophile) and those who colluded with them and covered up their actions.You can’t get past the guilt part of this. I’m more interested in whether there’s a culture of silence that requires priests not to speak about such things.
Um…I’m a convert to Catholicism. I was never so grateful to have been raised Protestant as the past two weeks. I am so glad to not be a product of Catholic culture. A culture that tolerates no dissent and no challenge to authority. A culture that uses “avoiding scandal” to justify hiding systemic abuse. Make no mistake; the number of victims is in the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions over the centuries. This is why Catholic leaders have resisted a grand jury investigation of their archives. It would devastate the faithful. They know the faith of Catholics is generally based on outward signs and not inward conversion.
The laity is dependent on the clergy to the point where they tolerate the most abhorrent behavior. Protestants would never tolerate this level of corruption in their churches. Jesus is God! The Alpha and Omega. The First and the Last. The Beginning and the End. He is not bound by flesh. He can use anyone or anything to preach the gospel. He doesn’t NEED priests. He CHOOSES to use priests. He can (and has) dispensed with them. He destroyed the temple and eliminated the priests of the OT because of corruption and abuse of his sheep. He can feed us the Eucharist directly from heaven, if necessary. The laity must realize that Jesus is equally their God. Priests serve at the behest of God, not because they are superior beings. To be Protestant is to know your value before the almighty. It’s to be free to say, ENOUGH! Discern the character of any priest by testing the spirit as Christ commanded. Peace!
Why not assume that a priest is good until you have specific reason to think otherwise about that individual priest?it’s hard sometimes to know who the good priests are
That’s kind of my point. I never assumed anything negative about any priest. And now many of those who served my childhood parish are listed in bishop-accountability.org. I think it’s reasonable to be shy about placing one’s complete and unquestioning trust in priests now.gracepoole:![]()
Why not assume that a priest is good until you have specific reason to think otherwise about that individual priest?it’s hard sometimes to know who the good priests are
Yes we should keep our eyes open, but we shouldn’t start by assuming the worst until proved otherwise.