Interesting. Thanks for sharing.
click here google youtube how Dems messed themselves
The Boston Globe put this question to the judge herself:I can’t find any evidence that the Judge said anything about Mueller’s culpability.
Can you help by providing evidence that supports your charge?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...er-don-hold/kDPSq2ek8xDTFiPZix4yoL/story.htmlDid Mueller know the four men had been wrongly convicted and look the other way?
There’s nothing linking Mueller to that case, according to several attorneys for the men, voluminous court records, and a former federal judge who presided over their wrongful imprisonment trial. In 2007, then US District Judge Nancy Gertner found that the FBI deliberately withheld evidence that the four men were innocent and that the bureau helped cover up the injustice for decades. She ordered the government to pay the men and their families $101.7 million.
“Absolutely nothing in the record that I saw suggested Mueller’s involvement in any way in either the initial acts that led to the four men’s imprisonment, or the acts that ended in their continued imprisonment and denying them parole or the coverup,” Gertner said Friday.
No surprises there! LOLThe whole story told in this article demolishes the attack launched against Mueller in connections with this wrongful conviction brought to the forum by @MonteRCMS and @Ridgerunner.
It attempts to, but this isn’t some recently manufactured attack on Mueller by Hannity and others.The whole story told in this article demolishes the attack launched against Mueller
But it doesn’t sound like you read the link, since it makes very clear what it is questioning Mueller about, and it is relevant to his time as an attorney.Thank you so much for this link that gives the time line on this case.
In my post I mentioned the attack of @Ridgerunner and @MonteRCMS. RR claimed that Mueller wrongfully convicted the Boston 4; Monte claimed that he willingly signed on and magnified inherited messes, but supplied no proof. The former claim, a terrible smear, is plainly false; the latter is supported only by the claim of Albano - for which there is no supporting evidence.It attempts to, but this isn’t some recently manufactured attack on Mueller by Hannity and others.
You are wrong I your suggestion about what I read.You just deflected away from what the article said.
Here’s Alan Dershowitz on Mueller’s history. But you know that.This thread came up as another poster had been making harsh attacks on Mueller - noted in my first post on the thread.
It would be gracious of you to begin any comments on Mueller’s activity in Boston with a retraction of the plainly false charge that you made against him several time on this forum.Here’s Alan Dershowitz on Mueller’s history. But you know that.
I am not going to bow and scrape to you, so forget that. I do realize you exaggerate your accusations beyond what someone actually does.That does not sound like a retraction of the false charges that you made.
If for some reason you consider yourself a better expert on attorney conduct than Dershowitz, give us your credentials so we can compare.Thanks for the quote from Dershowitz. Curious that he does not provide any evidence for his defamatory opinion.
Dershowitz knows about evidence. And didn’t supply any.If for some reason you consider yourself a better expert on attorney conduct than Dershowitz, give us your credentials so we can compare.
I am certain that you know no such thing, since what you accuse me of - some might say rudely - is not something that I do. Mueller did not convict these men. There has, as yet, been no evidence presented that he knew of their wrongful conviction and worked to thwart justice.I am not going to bow and scrape to you, so forget that. I do realize you exaggerate your accusations beyond what someone actually does.
If anything, one should always look at whatever any attorney says with some skepticism, since it is their job to be an advocate.Dershowitz knows about evidence. And didn’t supply any.