M
mangy_dog
Guest
“Being dead does not follow that we stop being human. Our body doesn’t become the body of a goat or fish.” He is therefore saying that the dead body of a human being is also a human being. Can anyone detect the confusion in that statement? There seems to be no more difference between one who is dead and one who is alive.
Look at this logic: “Human has a soul within. That dead body is human. Therefore that dead body has a soul within.” Tell me please, what rule of categorical syllogism is being violated in such logic?