Humanzees/chumans

  • Thread starter Thread starter N0X3x
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Everyone knows that Mules don’t reproduce. In like manner, species hybrids of any type, would not reproduce. So it is a question we won’t have to answer.The whole idea springs from a sick mind. It is not worthy of discussion.

Linus2nd
I’d have to disagree. If Chumans could exist, then questioning how we ought to treat them may have some value at some point down the road. Whether or not they could interbreed doesn’t seem to make any differerenc, at least as far as moral treatment is concerned. And anyway, I think the hypothetical is worth considering, as it raises some challenging questions about Catholic moral personhood.
 
I’d have to disagree. If Chumans could exist, then questioning how we ought to treat them may have some value at some point down the road. Whether or not they could interbreed doesn’t seem to make any differerenc, at least as far as moral treatment is concerned. And anyway, I think the hypothetical is worth considering, as it raises some challenging questions about Catholic moral personhood.
Disagree all you want. There are some things that should not be discussed, certainly not in public. We have enough idiots wasting their time on fools errands. They would do better spending a few hours a day on your knees instead of day dreaming about nonsensicals and hypotheticals. Could elephants be made to fly? Finding the answer to that would be just as useful.

Linus2nd.
 
Everyone knows that Mules don’t reproduce. In like manner, species hybrids of any type, would not reproduce. So it is a question we won’t have to answer. The whole idea springs from a sick mind. It is not worthy of discussion.

Linus2nd
Actually, that’s not true. Although rare, there are cases of mules being fertile and producing other mules, although it’s not something that continues on. In other words, the next generation of mules is indeed sterile, at least in the very few cases that it’s happened.
 
More bull. I think people are going mad. This whole discussion is madness.

Linus2nd
Would hybridizing a human and a chimpanzee (or other ape) be mad and unethical beyond belief? Yes, without a doubt. Could it happen? There’s always a chance. The church would be better off having an ethical discussion about it now than later, that’s for sure. After all, the Vatican DOES have a plan in place in case of the discovery of aliens or alien contact, and that’s no less crazy. I agree with N0X3x.

And I do take some offense to my comments being called bull. I’m happy to provide scientific evidence for my claims, although I suspect you’d dismiss them out of hand.
 
What moral status would this organism have? Would it be a human, with an immortal spirit, or an animal, without one?
Let’s reverse the question: what is the moral status of an anencephalic human (i.e. a human with underdeveloped cortex)?

You have to realize that your problem only arises because you have tied soul to species membership. But if you think of a soul as product of a sufficiently advanced brain (or, more generally, sufficiently advanced cognitive functions), then your problem disappears.

And tying soul to specied membership is a very dumb thing to do. Consider the following thought experiment: you are evil overlord and you want to do some evil thing (obviously).

You know that humans are ensouled, but chimps are not. Genetic difference between a human and a chimp is 30 million DNA base pairs. So you make 30 million hybrids like that:
  • hybrid #0 – (reference) chimp
  • hybrid #1 – chimp + 1 base pair modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #2 – chimp + 2 base pairs modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #29’999’998 – human -2 base pairs
  • hybrid #29’999’999 – human -1 base pairs
  • hybrid #30’000’000 – (reference) human
The concept that soul is tied to species membership dicates that at some point, hybrid #N is already ensouled, by hybrid #N-1 is not. Let’s say that you have a “soul test” which allows you to find what N is.

But! We know what base pair was changed between hybrids #N and #N+1. So we know that changing this specific base pair, call it base pair #P, triggers ensoulment. So we now make two more hybrids:
  • hybrid A: human, base pair #P from chimp. Result: human, unensouled.
  • hybrid B: human, base pair #P from humen. Result: chimp, ensouled.
You run your “soul test” to validate the above.

And! You now have a genetic test to see if humans are ensouled. So, you now take DNA swabs of all your subjects and identify those who have the base pair #P flipped.

And you declare that they are, both legally and morally, animals.

Then, you get a better idea. You genetically engineer a virus which flips base pair #P. So the person infected loses his/her soul and becomes an animal.
 
I’d have to disagree. If Chumans could exist, then questioning how we ought to treat them may have some value at some point down the road. Whether or not they could interbreed doesn’t seem to make any differerenc, at least as far as moral treatment is concerned. And anyway, I think the hypothetical is worth considering, as it raises some challenging questions about Catholic moral personhood.
👍 Spain, Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand already recognise the rights of the great apes anyway and prohibit experimentation on them.
 
Let’s reverse the quest what is the moral status of an anencephalic human (i.e. a human with underdeveloped cortex)?

You have to realize that your problem only arises because you have tied soul to species membership. But if you think of a soul as product of a sufficiently advanced brain (or, more generally, sufficiently advanced cognitive functions), then your problem disappears.

And tying soul to specied membership is a very dumb thing to do. Consider the following thought experiment: you are evil overlord and you want to do some evil thing (obviously).

You know that humans are ensouled, but chimps are not. Genetic difference between a human and a chimp is 30 million DNA base pairs. So you make 30 million hybrids like that:
  • hybrid #0 – (reference) chimp
  • hybrid #1 – chimp + 1 base pair modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #2 – chimp + 2 base pairs modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #29’999’998 – human -2 base pairs
  • hybrid #29’999’999 – human -1 base pairs
  • hybrid #30’000’000 – (reference) human
The concept that soul is tied to species membership dicates that at some point, hybrid #N is already ensouled, by hybrid #N-1 is not. Let’s say that you have a “soul test” which allows you to find what N is.

But! We know what base pair was changed between hybrids #N and #N+1. So we know that changing this specific base pair, call it base pair #P, triggers ensoulment. So we now make two more hybrids:
  • hybrid A: human, base pair #P from chimp. Result: human, unensouled.
  • hybrid B: human, base pair #P from humen. Result: chimp, ensouled.
You run your “soul test” to validate the above.

And! You now have a genetic test to see if humans are ensouled. So, you now take DNA swabs of all your subjects and identify those who have the base pair #P flipped.

And you declare that they are, both legally and morally, animals.

Then, you get a better idea. You genetically engineer a virus which flips base pair #P. So the person infected loses his/her soul and becomes an animal.
On the less evil side, you could create a virus that injects the ‘soul’ base pair into other animals, like dogs. Then parents can say with certainty that their kid’s beloved pet will meet them in heaven. (Providing it didn’t commit any mortal dog sins of course)
 
👍 Spain, Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand already recognise the rights of the great apes anyway and prohibit experimentation on them.
I don’t think we want to go that route in America.

I for one, would oppose granting “rights” to a class of animal where human beings do not even have the right to life.

PS, I understand you are not in the USA.

ICXC NIKA
 
Would hybridizing a human and a chimpanzee (or other ape) be mad and unethical beyond belief? Yes, without a doubt. Could it happen? There’s always a chance. The church would be better off having an ethical discussion about it now than later, that’s for sure. After all, the Vatican DOES have a plan in place in case of the discovery of aliens or alien contact, and that’s no less crazy. I agree with N0X3x.

And I do take some offense to my comments being called bull. I’m happy to provide scientific evidence for my claims, although I suspect you’d dismiss them out of hand.
The difference is that the world is already searching frantically for aliens, and while I for one consider it a waste of time (what good can finding them do for us; versus a lot of harm), there is no sin involved in looking for them.

For the Church to publically discuss the ethics of humanzees would be taken by some as encouragement to proceed along that line of research.

ICXC NIKA
 
On the less evil side, you could create a virus that injects the ‘soul’ base pair into other animals, like dogs. Then parents can say with certainty that their kid’s beloved pet will meet them in heaven. (Providing it didn’t commit any mortal dog sins of course)
Oh thanks. You gave me a tool for a truly evil plan: Spread the ensouling virus in an industrial pig farm. After making sure that the pigs have been ensouled, perform the baptism rite on them. Grab the popcorn, and watch the resulting theological argument 🙂
 
Aquinas would say the immortality of the soul is known from our ability for abstract thought. Any animal that is capable of abstract thought would then be classed human.

Such progeny would also be “born” in original sin as OS is passed on by biological reproduction.
Aren’t there many human beings that are incapable of abstract thought? Are you suggesting that these people are, morally speaking, animals?
 
Disagree all you want. There are some things that should not be discussed, certainly not in public. We have enough idiots wasting their time on fools errands. They would do better spending a few hours a day on your knees instead of day dreaming about nonsensicals and hypotheticals. Could elephants be made to fly? Finding the answer to that would be just as useful.

Linus2nd.
This is a Catholic philosophical forum, which addresses Catholic philosophical issues. If this topic can’t be discussed here, where could it be? Raising hypotheticals is important to philosophical progress, and asking questions that may seem unspeakable to most individuals can be as well. It is philosophical suicide to claim that any subject, especially those that have ethical consequences, is un-discussable. Keep in mind that no one is forced to read through this thread, and that I even warned those who might be offended by this thread’s contents in the OP. Only those who are interested in addressing the issue need view it.
 
Let’s reverse the question: what is the moral status of an anencephalic human (i.e. a human with underdeveloped cortex)?

You have to realize that your problem only arises because you have tied soul to species membership. But if you think of a soul as product of a sufficiently advanced brain (or, more generally, sufficiently advanced cognitive functions), then your problem disappears.
It seems that tying the soul to the biological body is exactly what the church does. After all, fetuses, those in vegetative states, and those with severe mental handicaps are given moral worth.
And tying soul to specied membership is a very dumb thing to do. Consider the following thought experiment: you are evil overlord and you want to do some evil thing (obviously).
You know that humans are ensouled, but chimps are not. Genetic difference between a human and a chimp is 30 million DNA base pairs. So you make 30 million hybrids like that:
  • hybrid #0 – (reference) chimp
  • hybrid #1 – chimp + 1 base pair modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #2 – chimp + 2 base pairs modifed in human direction
  • hybrid #29’999’998 – human -2 base pairs
  • hybrid #29’999’999 – human -1 base pairs
  • hybrid #30’000’000 – (reference) human
The concept that soul is tied to species membership dicates that at some point, hybrid #N is already ensouled, by hybrid #N-1 is not. Let’s say that you have a “soul test” which allows you to find what N is.
But! We know what base pair was changed between hybrids #N and #N+1. So we know that changing this specific base pair, call it base pair #P, triggers ensoulment. So we now make two more hybrids:
  • hybrid A: human, base pair #P from chimp. Result: human, unensouled.
  • hybrid B: human, base pair #P from humen. Result: chimp, ensouled.
You run your “soul test” to validate the above.
And! You now have a genetic test to see if humans are ensouled. So, you now take DNA swabs of all your subjects and identify those who have the base pair #P flipped.
And you declare that they are, both legally and morally, animals.
Then, you get a better idea. You genetically engineer a virus which flips base pair #P. So the person infected loses his/her soul and becomes an animal.
I doubt that ensoulment would be attached to one particular gene. My guess is that there would be some number of human base pairs that would trigger ensolment. I think the church teaches that all human beings have immortal souls, If the soul were genetic, then there probably would have been a number members of the species homo sapien who, through some mutation, have lacked this gene, and have been mistakenly treated as if they have had souls. Our very identities would reside in a single fraction of a molecule. Philotes, anyone?
 
Aren’t there many human beings that are incapable of abstract thought? Are you suggesting that these people are, morally speaking, animals?
Bingo.

It seems to me that professional philosophers tying “humanhood” to the ability to do philosophy is a textbook case of self-serving argument.

ICXC NIKA
 
Aren’t there many human beings that are incapable of abstract thought? Are you suggesting that these people are, morally speaking, animals?

A human fetus presumably does not have consciousness in the first few months,
but it still has a human soul and the potential to become Einstein.

An adult human with brain damage or mental developmental problems is just as human as anybody.

The healthiest ape is incapable of abstract thought. It’s all “here and now” with animals.
 
Oh thanks. You gave me a tool for a truly evil plan: Spread the ensouling virus in an industrial pig farm. After making sure that the pigs have been ensouled, perform the baptism rite on them. Grab the popcorn, and watch the resulting theological argument 🙂
You are assuming that there are no dogs in heaven - and probably that heaven doesn’t exist…
 
It seems that tying the soul to the biological body is exactly what the church does. After all, fetuses, those in vegetative states, and those with severe mental handicaps are given moral worth.

I doubt that ensoulment would be attached to one particular gene. My guess is that there would be some number of human base pairs that would trigger ensolment. I think the church teaches that all human beings have immortal souls, If the soul were genetic, then there probably would have been a number members of the species homo sapien who, through some mutation, have lacked this gene, and have been mistakenly treated as if they have had souls. Our very identities would reside in a single fraction of a molecule. Philotes, anyone?
I doubt that souls are the only type of soul. 🙂
 
If a person is genetically modified for the purpose of achieving some “superhuman” quality, can that person later repent against such modification?
 
Everyone knows that Mules don’t reproduce. In like manner, species hybrids of any type, would not reproduce. So it is a question we won’t have to answer. The whole idea springs from a sick mind. It is not worthy of discussion.

Linus2nd
However, one of the arguments against GM crops is that hybridized and transgene crops are sometimes more fertile than the manufacturers admit and can become viable in the wild and even able to cross-pollinate with wild plants and weeds, raising fears that some super weed is on the horizon that will be resistent to all pesticides.There is already documented evidence of GM genes being identified in wild plants.

There are also reports of fishermen bringing in GM salmon.

If plants and fish can do it today. How much longer until mammals will be doing it, and then people?
 
It seems that tying the soul to the biological body is exactly what the church does. After all, fetuses, those in vegetative states, and those with severe mental handicaps are given moral worth.
Of course soul is tied to the biological body.

Soul is life, and the live body holds the life.

Without a body, there can be no life or soul.

Put humanly, your body makes you somebody!

The hideousness that is death will be compensated when our mind/life is fitted with the pneumatikon soma. (Spiritual Body).

ICXC NIKA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top