A
Agnus-Dei
Guest
I was trying for a witty response to this. Failed.if there is anything that would be more attractive to human nature uninformed by Divine grace, I’d like to know what it is.
Dominus vobiscum
Last edited:
I was trying for a witty response to this. Failed.if there is anything that would be more attractive to human nature uninformed by Divine grace, I’d like to know what it is.
Why is there a full stop at the end? After the last “]” ?
Perhaps with prayer for him he will change his mind.He’s doing it anyway.
I don’t “pretend like it’s not a thing anymore”. It is Church teaching and therefore I accept it. However, as someone else pointed out in another thread, the term “marital debt” sounds absolutely horrible in English. It just doesn’t translate right from Latin. I would go so far as to say the same thing about “Sunday obligation”. It comes across (especially to non-Catholic ears) as saying “you little guttersnipes wouldn’t go to Mass but once in a blue moon if we, the Church, didn’t make you go under pain of losing your soul”.Are you familiar with the concept of the “marital debt”? I know everyone pretends like it’s not a thing anymore but I think it’s why it’s a sin to withhold the “marital embrace” right?
It is not “Catholic law”, it is Catholic moral doctrine that applies to all mankind. What “his denomination” has to say about it is beside the point. Bluntly put, we’re right and they’re wrong. This, of course, does not touch his subjective culpability — Protestants don’t “get” that contraception is wrong, any more than Catholics “get” the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ teaching that blood transfusion is wrong (just using this to make the argument, not implying that they are right).He isn’t catholic and isn’t bound by catholic law, as far as I know. If his denomination says it isn’t a sin then I don’t think he would be fully culpable sin-wise, and you certainly wouldn’t be.
omy.
We are ultimately responsible for our own decisions. Hi
One or the other spouse making themselves permanently and totally sterile absolutely enables them to engage in extra-marital sexual relations without the other partner being any the wiser, especially if is the wife who is sterilized. I say this because while the man could hide his involvement (until the courts catch up with him to seek paternity testing and child support), it would be pretty hard for a woman to hide the fact that she is pregnant. This is the point where a man offers to pay for his paramour’s abortion, or where the wife secretly gets an abortion (not sure how she would hide this from her husband, the need for self-treatment and a period of abstinence after the fact would be kind of hard to explain away).He had a vasectomy as well, but didn’t tell the wife. It was for the purpose of extra-marital affairs without possibility of pregnancy. If he were given the gift of chastity, he would not feel a need for the vasectomy.
This title is a hoot!OP – can I recommend a book? It’s called “First kill all the marriage counselors”,
That’s exactly what I meant. He isn’t part of the Catholic Church and so he wouldn’t be culpable for not believing in our moral doctrine (if he honestly doesn’t) even if it is the Truth.t is not “Catholic law”, it is Catholic moral doctrine that applies to all mankind. What “his denomination” has to say about it is beside the point. Bluntly put, we’re right and they’re wrong. This, of course, does not touch his subjective culpability — Protestants don’t “get” that contraception is wrong, any more than Catholics “get” the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ teaching that blood transfusion is wrong (just using this to make the argument, not implying that they are right).
I am so sorry that happened to you, and I can see how that would build resentment and mistrust. Even though that has likely been a bitter pill to swallow all these years, please reconsider withholding marital relations. The Church doesn’t require it, if you are not the one actively engaging in contraception.Our plan was to have a large family, practice NFP and raise the kids Catholic. After we were married, he either changed his mind about the first two things or he lied to me before marriage. I asked him about it but he wouldn’t talk to me about it
All people are bound by Christ’s laws on marriage and sexual morality.He isn’t catholic and isn’t bound by catholic law, as far as I know.
Whether he has even an inkling that there might, just might, be something sinful about contraception, is a question only he could answer. His degree of culpability is a question that, ultimately, only Almighty God could answer.t is not “Catholic law”, it is Catholic moral doctrine that applies to all mankind. What “his denomination” has to say about it is beside the point. Bluntly put, we’re right and they’re wrong. This, of course, does not touch his subjective culpability — Protestants don’t “get” that contraception is wrong, any more than Catholics “get” the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ teaching that blood transfusion is wrong (just using this to make the argument, not implying that they are right).
I have to think there is the odd non-Catholic, here or there, who has a vague feeling that there is something just a little bogus about deliberately preventing the function that is written into nature itself for the propagation of the human race.
There is the temptation to “go soft” on contraception, implicitly to think “it couldn’t be so bad, after all, pretty much everyone except orthodox Roman Catholics thinks it’s okay, including Protestants”. If you will stop and think about it, efficient and highly reliable methods of artificial birth control, coupled with sterilization where it seems to be the best option (“we’re all done having kids, we’ve been blessed, God’s been good to us” — as though it’s our call when we quit accepting God’s blessings!), makes the modern world and its economy “work”. Women entering the workplace en masse, compact little families with children who come only when they’re wanted, in the numbers they’re desired, population growth, and thus economic growth, ensured by picking the immigrants you let in and being able to screen for quality (this isn’t working out so well along the southern border…) — what’s not to like?
As long as orthodox Catholic magisterial teaching is upheld and not compromised, Retrouvaille sounds like a great idea.Do you think he would go to a Retrouvaille weekend with you to work on your marriage and communication?
Amen to that!He isn’t catholic and isn’t bound by catholic law, as far as I know.