Sin certainly does not invalidate the promise for better or for worse. Neither does physical abuse.
But you can say the words of a vow and not mean them.
If someone forces you to marry someone, you may say the words of the vow, but they are meaningless or null-- therefore you can get a declaration of nullity of the marriage, right?
Similarly, if you “promise” someone with your words to be faithful to them but are being unfaithful days before or after you make the vow, especially if you are lying about your actions before or after, you can say the words of marriage and not have them mean anything. The vow to be faithful is a lie.
Like you can tell your kids “i promise we’re going to get ice cream tomorrow,” but if you don’t get ice cream tomorrow your words don’t mean anything.
Infidelity does not just mean “having sex with someone else”. Having a lap dance with a stripper (and we already know the husband lied about it multiple times and in different ways so we have no idea if that was all), is 100% infidelity. Ask ANY priest in the world. I’m really concerned that people here don’t think gross sexual immorality with a prostitute (stripper) is major infidelity.
Also WHAT on earth is the husband doing with his guy friends in Vegas? We don’t know, but given the guy’s history with lying, the wife may never know. The husband might be better at lying now. He has already shown himself not to be trusted.
If you’re lying about important matters relating directly to your marriage (prostitutes, bachelor party) right around the time of your wedding, it casts your promise to be married into extreme doubt.
I’m not a tribunal certainly but it would make perfect sense to me if this marriage was found never to have existed (since the husband’s promise seems so defective and untrustworthy), which is all a declaration of nullity means.
With annulments, the church does not dissolve marriages that already exist. That is impossible for anyone – what God has joined etc.
It just declares that the particular marriage in question never existed, because one or both of the people involved did not have the ability or intention to make a permanent vow.