S
steve_b
Guest
Nonsense. The universe and everytrhing in it was a creation.The universe is not evidence of a god, or a creator. It is evidence only of the universe.
Nonsense. The universe and everytrhing in it was a creation.The universe is not evidence of a god, or a creator. It is evidence only of the universe.

I will keep it brief:So what is ‘irreducibly complex’, ontologysue? Also, if it can be reduced, does your opinion change? Or just your arguments?
Amen and AmenI will keep it brief:
1)The DNA in each cell has 3 1/2 billion nucleotide bases. That simple fact tells us that there is more information in each cell than in 3 complete sets of Encyclopedia Britannica.
It defies logic that this kind of “intelligent complexity” could have formed randomly from chemical units. Mathematical minds far greater than mine have called the probability “neglegent.”
- Each cell in the body makes 2000 proteins every second. According to Scientific American this process is so complex that it would take a supercomputer, programed with the rules of protein folding, billions of years. It takes only seconds in each cell of the human body.
What the DNA/RNA scientists are discovering is that the salient point is not even the astonishing speed and efficiency with which these messages are carried, but the fact that they are “messages” and this, logically deduced, implies intelligence, “embodied intelligence in a set of signs that have their own meaning.”
So, as Lord Kelvin, a mathematical prodigy, once said, “if you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God.”
Thank you, A.T.thats reasonable.![]()
But that’s what makes them so interesting, too!It’s the clarity of religious terms that makes it so easy to discuss them.![]()
Yes, good point. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that if you or i come to the conclusion that the universe was purposefully and intelligently designed, then you or i might conclude that if the designer does not know all there is to know, he certainly knows more than the collective knowledge of all human beings.I have to disagree here, S4J. Just because someone created something doesn’t mean that they know everything about it. Look at the internet - some few people created it, and those few have no way of knowing all of it’s contents…
I stand corrected again. It’s ironic that you are agreeing with the only author of the Bible who is described as a man after God’s own heart! This author David wrote the words:…I don’t agree with this, either. If there were a god who created everything, assuming that this god is hiding from us is just a little paranoid to me. Why would I agree that we can’t know about this god just because he doesn’t want us to? We learn plenty from beings that don’t cooperate.
…
In response to your objection i’d like to ask you to take a moment to consider this: Have you ever stopped to think that the Web browser you are viewing, and the operating system running on your computer, and the Web page you download from catholic.com are all, in essence, computer language that is merely a series of ones and zeros? I mean, these numbers…The universe is not evidence of a god, or a creator. It is evidence only of the universe. …
More than 20 years ago i asked much the same question of a major in the U.S. Army. His answer astonished me. He said that he had been reading the Bible for many years and had never found one contradiction.…Excellent, here we are at evidence that your described god could not exist. … If he knows everything and is all powerful, how come there are so many errors and contradictions in the bible? Is it possible that it is not a fax from heaven? …
You have asked several extremely good and thoughtful questions. I only have time now to give my honest opinion and answer to one of them.…If he knows all, and is all powerful, how is it that he keeps failing utterly in his attempts to eliminate sin? He created sin, and satan, so why does he ‘lose’ so many souls? If he were really all-powerful, wouldn’t it be a lot simpler to tell which religions were nonsense and which were not? I mean by average, ordinary people…
I can still see by your signature that you are truly afraid of doubting. I hope you get over your fear of insulting the divinity by using the brain you were born with.Nonsense. The universe and everytrhing in it was a creation.
As I said before, it’s not doubt in general, it’s doubt in God.I can still see by your signature that you are truly afraid of doubting.
Maybe you could answer this post for me. I included Stephen Hawking’s lectures for reference.I hope you get over your fear of insulting the divinity by using the brain you were born with.
Yes, the god you describe is not worthy of worship. I do not blame you for withholding love for such a beast. Yet, it remains to be seen if this God you describe is the one in whom i trust and try to obey and love.…Your god either *likes *all the evil that exists and *planned *it that way, making him evil, or is not all-powerful or all-good.
Certainly not worthy of my worship. What has this being done to demonstrate that I should worship it? By the way, I don’t worship power.
I tried to do the same. This is a deep subject. I had to go ask a friend to help me understand a little more about the matter. I will share some of his thoughts with you (and some of mine)I will keep it brief:
If one assumes that each nucleotide comprises 2 bits of information (because there are 4 possible nucleotides), then one can assign a naive “bit size” to a genome. The problem being that if one does this, one finds anomalies quite readily. Not the least of which being that there are single celled life forms whose genomes are far larger than the human genome - the amoeba species Amoeba dubia has a genome whose size is 6 × 10[sup]11[/sup] bp (base pairs), which is over 200 times larger than the human genome, meaning that on the basis of this naive measure, that amoeba is over 200 times more complex than a human being. Bit of a blow there for the idea that humans are somehow the “pinnacle of creation”, don’t you think?1)The DNA in each cell has 3 1/2 billion nucleotide bases. That simple fact tells us that there is more information in each cell than in 3 complete sets of Encyclopedia Britannica.
We might need supercomputers to determine protein folding by analysis of the constituent amino acids, but the proteins themselves do not. They fold in accordance with well understood laws of stereochemistry. The reason it takes a supercomputer to analyse protein folding is that for large assemblages of amino acids, the computations required for an analysis multiply enormously. However, the molecules in question just respond to the electrostatic forces involved, and fold in accordance with those electrostatic forces - they don’t need any ‘guiding hand’ to do this. In fact, the process can be observed taking place using femtosecond laser pulses and observed in real time.
- Each cell in the body makes 2000 proteins every second. According to Scientific American this process is so complex that it would take a supercomputer, programed with the rules of protein folding, billions of years. It takes only seconds in each cell of the human body.
Tell me, ontologysue, does it really defy logic? The fact that supercomputers can work with it at all tells me that some logic can be applied. Is it possible that this was just a turn of phrase to describe your lack of understanding of the subject? I know that I don’t understand it very well, but just because I don’t understand something, I don’t automatically assume it is evidence of a creator.It defies logic that this kind of “intelligent complexity” could have formed randomly from chemical units.
When did he say this? Hundreds of years ago, wasn’t it? That is a long way into the past to go for an authority to argue from.So, as Lord Kelvin, a mathematical prodigy, once said, “if you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God.”
It is catholic history and reading the bible (and reading *about *the bible) are what removed any belief in Yahweh (or Jehovah, or whatever name he uses at this time)If you were referring to my heritage (and yours), the Catholic Faith, you can research it just as easily as I can. Study the history, the Early Church Fathers, the Councils, and the numerous writings and encyclicals.
I have a clock on my desk at work which displays the time in binary. I know the basics of that number system. It is not much different than our decimal system, aside from the number of available digits.My question to you A is this:
If you could consider the binary computer language behind all programming code that is behind all the Graphic User Interface you take for granted every day, these series of ones and zeros are no accident. Would you agree?
Jeremiah 3:12I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not keep anger for ever.Perhaps i have been careless in my investigation. Will you point out one of these many contradictions you have found, A?
This is why is is fairly pointless to continue. If someone discovered solid proof that your god didn’t exist, you would still hold to your signature.As I said before, it’s not doubt in general, it’s doubt in God.