I am an atheist thread 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter _A
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What about Demonic possession were the person speaks in different languages they never knew? and also affirms the existence of hell.

I think “demonic possessions” are evidence that people have mental illnesses that we may not fully understand.

Les I don’t recall a mental illness were you can speak multiple languages. and I have the DSMIV right here.🤷
I am not aware of any scientific studies that have proven people have been possessed by a demon. Do you have a source?
I will say, the stories of possessions are interesting, but that doesn’t make them true.
I am new to becoming a practicing Catholic so the old testament does seem far fetched but thats ok because I’m not Jewish. I don’t believe all of the OT but I do believe the commandments. No I don’t believe that a person got swallowed by a fish and spent 3 days and 3 nights in the belly(OT) but at the same time we have to understand this was written long ago by people who describe things differently than us.
Do you think the “fall of man” happened as described in genesis?

les
 
Les in your case where if you cannot see it, hear it, taste it, feel it, or smell it I have no evidence for you. But then again no one would have evidence for you that it rained a hundred years ago in NEW YORK CITY.
SIGH !!! Rain is a natural occurrence. I believe it was raining in New York a hundred years ago.

If I died not believing it rained in New York a hundred years ago would I be put in a place of “separation from rain”???

Sounds kind of silly, doesn’t it ???

les
 
If I am wrong their is a GOD I lose nothing if you are wrong that God does not exist you lose everything.

Another bad bet and guess by who?
Hey 659

Your repeating yourself, Again. This is about the fifth time now for the above.

Snort another line and calm down. 😃

les
 
Actually atheists bear as much burden of proof to show that man is the highest intelligence, as theists bear burden to show God is.

And guess what, the universal forces are God that created and controls everything, including the existence of man’s intelligence which is in the likeness of the force that created it, so there is the theist’s proof of God.

An atheist now has to show something more powerful than that to disprove God. So good luck to them.
Actually atheists bear as much burden of proof to show that man is the highest intelligence, as theists bear burden to show Zeus is.

And guess what, the universal forces are Zeus that created and controls everything, including the existence of man’s intelligence which is in the likeness of the force that created it, so there is the theist’s proof of Zeus.

An atheist now has to show something more powerful than that to disprove Zeus. So good luck to them.

les
 
Actually atheists bear as much burden of proof to show that man is the highest intelligence, as theists bear burden to show Zeus is.

And guess what, the universal forces are Zeus that created and controls everything, including the existence of man’s intelligence which is in the likeness of the force that created it, so there is the theist’s proof of Zeus.

An atheist now has to show something more powerful than that to disprove Zeus. So good luck to them.

les
It’s all proof that you have a God who creates and controls everything you do, even what you think. Further defining that God is another issue.
 
Hey 659

Your repeating yourself, Again. This is about the fifth time now for the above.

Snort another line and calm down. 😃

Les
Why do you have any proof of that statement in regards to me snorting lines. Seems to me Atheists make lots of statements without any facts.
 
SIGH !!! Rain is a natural occurrence. I believe it was raining in New York a hundred years ago.

If I died not believing it rained in New York a hundred years ago would I be put in a place of “separation from rain”???

Sounds kind of silly, doesn’t it ???

Les
I will make it easy for you Les instead of showing me evidence from 2000 years ago just show me proof that it rained in New York City 300 years ago.

Use the same evidence that you will require from me.

That is no testimony, no eye witness accounts, and no history. Also do not place place any smart remarks as you did last sentence of this post.

see it, feel it, smell it, taste it, hear it.

Is that not the evidence you require to prove God exists.

As you stated you want to witness the moon changed by God as a test before you believe any evidence?
 
Why do you have any proof of that statement in regards to me snorting lines. Seems to me Atheists make lots of statements without any facts.
I have done told you once. I used the “big tooth smily”. I was kidding.

les
 
I have done told you once. I used the “big tooth smily”. I was kidding.

les
Les if I stated these offense remarks to you would you be offended along with your other adjectives used here as it relates to me or others on this thread with phooney. If you wish a peace treaty just say so otherwise the thread is dead
Well you tell me.

'A" As the starter of the thread I did not start this and have been nothing but civil when it come to personal attacks of God or others.You are on a Catholic Forum and as such there is a moral and civil responsibility here.
 
I do not ask you to prove something here from 2000 years ago just to show one of his or your posts that were constructive in proving or disproving there is a God other than feelings. you have not shown one shred of evidence to disprove the simplest of evidence I have brought forth.
All the evidence you have presented here is honestly not enough to convince me that there is a god, and he killed himself on a cross and rose from the dead. The story is too fantastic and would need much more evidence. Something direct, and contradicting the laws of physics, chemistry or biology in the same way as I am expected to believe. (i.e.-if I am asked to believe that he can raise the dead, I want the best scientists studying it…if it has been claimed that he created this entire world, I would demand that he make more of them, while we humans have our best instruments at the ready.
I hope this explains why I have not been convinced by you.
How Christianity has overtaken the Jewish religion as the worlds largest and growing daily.quote]I don’t think it is the worlds largest anymore…not really important, but it’s size and growth are exceeded by Islam. I don’t remember where I read it, but you may want to look it up.
/
c659smith;3300203:
No scientific evidence by you to dispel the miracles such as Fatima witnessed by 70,000 only conjecture.
There is firm evidence by billions of others that the sun stayed right where it was.
Do you have 70,000 reports, or a few officials saying that everyone agreed on what they saw?/
How the crusification of Christ was foretold a thousand years before it was ever invented.
To me, that is not very remarkable./
Why 12 Apostles with no motive would be imprisoned, tortured, and killed for a lie of the ressurection
Could they have been tricked? Could they have been invented like your ‘crusification’?/
Why even today many Saints that have died several hundred years ago till present without any mumification are not dust or rotting.
If this happens outside your church, then what does it mean?
Why would a god choose to reveal himself in things like bits of dead person?/
i have disproved the concept of evolution as you have no facts.
If you understood science, theory or evolution, you couldn’t say such a strange thing./
science is still dumb founded and you have no facts or proof that the universe was not created only conjecture.
If you DO have facts or proof, you have been saving them./
I have proiven that atheism is living in the present with total disregard for history as for your own words if you cannot see it, touch it, smell it, hear it, or taste it ( the 5 senses) in your opinion it does not exist and there is no evidence exists to the contrary.
Nope, but when someone makes a tremendously impossible claim, I start to require a higher level of evidence./
You cannot disprove God does not exist
Sounds right to me.
Was it you who chastised a poster for using a double-negative in a sentence? I just wanted to say that I think they are OK.
/
and the rule of evidence is that if you cannot disprove evidence already founded than that evidence stands.

There are nut cases in this forum but it is not me.
The evidence can stand all it wants, it has to be enough evidence to suit the claim.
 
Wow, this thread has really degenerated. Perhaps time for a time-out, folks?
 
I will make it easy for you Les instead of showing me evidence from 2000 years ago just show me proof that it rained in New York City 300 years ago.

Use the same evidence that you will require from me.

That is no testimony, no eye witness accounts, and no history. Also do not place place any smart remarks as you did last sentence of this post.

see it, feel it, smell it, taste it, hear it.

Is that not the evidence you require to prove God exists.

As you stated you want to witness the moon changed by God as a test before you believe any evidence?
Here goes.

Rain is a natural occurrence.
It raining 300 years ago in NY is NOT a supernatural event. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE?

Saying it rained in NY is not the same as saying a man returned from the dead and became a god/savior of mankind. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE HERE?

I will quote him again:

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. CARL SAGAN

Do you understand what Carl Sagan meant by this statement??

Les
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top