I am the mistress to a married Catholic man, did I doom him to Hell forever?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ladystardust
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, it is true that the Bible says that. Matthew 5:28. But how many people or how many Catholics take that literally? If you go to a PG-13 or R rated movie, I don’t see how you can avoid looking at some of the women there lustfully? The way they act, the way they dress, what they do, all point to the idea that they want you to see them as sexy.
Ok, I see that you list as “other”.
Catholics believe that engaging in activities such as this are reserved for marriage.
It doesn’t matter what popular culture thinks.
The fact is, he is cheating on his wife by engaging in these activities with another woman. period.
What’s so hard to understand?
 
Yes, it is true that the Bible says that. Matthew 5:28. But how many people or how many Catholics take that literally? If you go to a PG-13 or R rated movie, I don’t see how you can avoid looking at some of the women there lustfully? The way they act, the way they dress, what they do, all point to the idea that they want you to see them as sexy.
If it’s not meant to be taken literally how are we supposed to interpret it?
You have to consent to it. No consent no sin. If it’s an occasion of sin avoid those movies. Make sure you are not watching a movie that is inherently sinful. The usccb has ratings for movies and the ones that are marked “O” are sinful(Mortally or venially) to watch even for adults.
 
But if he is Catholic, the marriage is not valid?
It probably isn’t but his “wife” thinks they’re married and women get heartbroken by their boyfriendS cheating on them imagine the heartbreak she will feel.

Even if there wasn’t some other women in the picture the stuff she described are reserved for marriage and those activities are wrong.
 
But if he is Catholic, the marriage is not valid?
For a Catholic, a “sacramental” marriage simply means a couple followed the church’s rules for marriage. If both spouses-to-be are baptized, the marriage provides additional graces. If only one party is baptized, then the marriage won’t provide these extra graces, but the marriage is still valid. A Catholic must marry according to church rules, even if marrying a non-Catholic.

Non-Catholics are bound by fewer rules than Catholics. **While non-Catholics don’t need to be married by the Catholic Church, they are still bound to a life-long monogamous **marriage. Non-Catholics could choose to be married by a judge, city clerk, a member of the clergy, etc, but cannot divorce. If both non-Catholics are baptized, then they will have a sacramental marriage; otherwise they will simply have a marriage.
 
Yes, it is true that the Bible says that. Matthew 5:28. But how many people or how many Catholics take that literally? If you go to a PG-13 or R rated movie, I don’t see how you can avoid looking at some of the women there lustfully? The way they act, the way they dress, what they do, all point to the idea that they want you to see them as sexy.
Do you just like to be contrary, Tombstone??

It’s a sin to look at a movie, but this married guy playing sex games with a girl is not? Wow, that’s rich! :rolleyes:
 
For a Catholic, a “sacramental” marriage simply means a couple followed the church’s rules for marriage. If both spouses-to-be are baptized, the marriage provides additional graces. If only one party is baptized, then the marriage won’t provide these extra graces, but the marriage is still valid. A Catholic must marry according to church rules, even if marrying a non-Catholic.

Non-Catholics are bound by fewer rules than Catholics. **While non-Catholics don’t need to be married by the Catholic Church, they are still bound to a life-long monogamous **marriage. Non-Catholics could choose to be married by a judge, city clerk, a member of the clergy, etc, but cannot divorce. If both non-Catholics are baptized, then they will have a sacramental marriage; otherwise they will simply have a marriage.
Catholics are supposed to be married by the Church.
He still has to support his partner and child so this is still cheating and a mortal sin
 
Catholics are supposed to be married by the Church.
He still has to support his partner and child so this is still cheating and a mortal sin
That what it says in the first paragraph.
 
What do you think about Matthew 5:28?
You know what I think about it! In this Topic & the Topic about actors I said about 10 times I agree with Matt. 5:28.

Stop playing innocent & changing your opinion on whether it’s a sin or not.
 
Yes, it is true that the Bible says that. Matthew 5:28. But how many people or how many Catholics take that literally? If you go to a PG-13 or R rated movie, I don’t see how you can avoid looking at some of the women there lustfully? The way they act, the way they dress, what they do, all point to the idea that they want you to see them as sexy.
Omg. The movies are dark. How are you looking at anyone lustfully in the movies? I understand that some women purposefully dress in a way to make men see them as objects, I don’t understand the whole “the way they act, what they do” aspect. What exactly are women doing/how are they acting to make you look at them as an object? Most women don’t walk around like prostitutes, prowling around. If you seriously have this much trouble at the movies/in public please seek treatment. Thanks.
 
Omg. The movies are dark. How are you looking at anyone lustfully in the movies? I understand that some women purposefully dress in a way to make men see them as objects, I don’t understand the whole “the way they act, what they do” aspect. What exactly are women doing/how are they acting to make you look at them as an object? Most women don’t walk around like prostitutes, prowling around. If you seriously have this much trouble at the movies/in public please seek treatment. Thanks.
I don’t think he meant the women in the theater. He meant the women in the actual movie.
 
QUOTE=Allegra;12648273]I don’t think he meant the women in the theater. He meant the women in the actual movie.

👍
 
Oh. He said women there, so it made me think literally there.😊
😉

To the OP…you can’t place him in hell. He will put himself there if he doesn’t repent and return to his wife.
You have a choice. Be a mistress and risk hurt everyone, including yourself, or be an adult and seek out an appropriate relationship. It’s all up to you.
 
Firstly, I am not a troll. It has been my personal misery to have such a deep connection with someone who, is ultimately an adulterer and unavailable.

Is it possible for me to remain friends with him?

As of now, the past week, I am only talking on the phone with him, and only about appropriate things…

Is it wrong to stay friends with your former mistress?

And a great thanks to everyones words of truth.
 
Firstly, I am not a troll. It has been my personal misery to have such a deep connection with someone who, is ultimately an adulterer and unavailable.

Is it possible for me to remain friends with him?

As of now, the past week, I am only talking on the phone with him, and only about appropriate things…

Is it wrong to stay friends with your former mistress?

And a great thanks to everyones words of truth.
it’s wrong because it’s too much temptation to fall back into the same behaviors.
Ask yourself: Do you think his wife would mind?
Probably.
 
Is it possible for me to remain friends with him?

.
No because you were never friends to start with. A friend would not ask someone to be a mistress nor would they offer to be the mistress of a married man
 
Firstly, I am not a troll. It has been my personal misery to have such a deep connection with someone who, is ultimately an adulterer and unavailable.
Is it possible for me to remain friends with him?
No. You need to cut off all contact.
As of now, the past week, I am only talking on the phone with him, and only about appropriate things…
Is it wrong to stay friends with your former mistress?
Yes. You need to do some serious thinking about the nature of true friendship. This ain’t it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top