S
swariffin
Guest
Please tell that to your nice Malaysian Muslim fellow, Paar.Hi
To err is human.
Thanks
Please tell that to your nice Malaysian Muslim fellow, Paar.Hi
To err is human.
Thanks
What makes it difficult is to determine that whether of not Muhammad was truthful. He never guaranteed his own word by his own life. Instead, he guaranteed his word by other people’s life.Hi
I think it is not difficult to understand.
Muhammad never wrote or authored Quran. Allah read it to Muhammad through an angel and Muhammad memorised it by heart. OK
Allah’s witnessing as mentioned in Quran to this effect is acceptable to us the Muslims. Allah is All-Seeing and All-Observing, he knew what happened to Mary and Jesus. We have to accept Allah’s lone witnessing in this case.
I elaborate it further.
Mary conceived a child without the touch of a man; this has been mentioned in Quran by lone witnessing of Allah. We all Muslims therefor accept it only on witnessing of Allah, we don’t ask for any further witnessing, as it not required logically.
If we Muslims deny lone witnessing of Allah in the case of Mary, then we would be thinking like the Jews thought; and they held Mary in doubt, you know of.
I think it is now crystal clear to you; however you may keep believing what satisfies you most but with solid reasons, no compulsion.
I love Jesus and Mary
Thanks
He believes that after throwing 1.000 unsupported childish claims, he can get one convert.i find it rather curious that these statements (either written like this, or variations somewhat, but more or less the same meaning) was found in almost every of his posts, and his continuous disregard to christians’ perspective of interpretation (simply dismissing it without much thought) simply inteprets that the poster is telling everyone time and time again,
He is the one that “keeps believing…and no compulsion” to hear what the rest of the world says.
if he seriously does not mind what others believe, why did he come up to this thread and kept on repeat his views, again and again…when it was clearly not accepted. shouldn’t he leave it as it is in that case, if he is not here to discuss, as was evident in his postings, more like trying to “teach”.
(I was reading every entry and was entertained…)
Planten,Rony, the picture you have posted is not that of Jesus. It is some representation of a scene. So it could be called fiction. There is some person on the cross whose hands are just tied up, no iron rod put through the palm or the through the wrist.
It was acted because Christianity uses all the senses to convey the message of Jesus and His Gospel. Pictures serve as visual aids to veneration. We don’t just hear the word of God, we also see it, smell it, taste it, and touch it. We receive it with our intellect, our will, and our body.It appears that some one has acted or enacted the scene. Why it was necessary to do that? Was it to follow in the footsteps of Jesus? Surely not. The cross was not the only part of Jesus life. There were many other things that Jesus did, the way he lived, the way he talked, the way he preached, The way he ate things.
We are called to live like Jesus, because Jesus tells us: “Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls” (Matt. 11:29). The actor in that movie and all of us are called to live this life of holiness. We can not, however, live it, unless the Father empowers us with the Holy Spirit so that we may be conformed into the image of His Son.Why not that one in the picture on the cross chose to live like Jesus lived. Was that man circumsized like Jesus? Did he pray like Jesus? Did he call the father like Jesus? Did he pray to the Lord like Jesus used to do?
You can ask any questions you like. Christians are called to be always prepared to make a defense or answer any one who calls us to give a reason for the hope that is in us, and yet we must give these answers with gentleness and reverence.There are so many questions which need to be answered just by the look at that photo. And we do not have any answer to those questions. I cannot ask the person in the photo. But I can ask you all those questions because you seem to have been much (affected) attached to the cruel scene.
What was done to our Lord Jesus, by putting him to death, was the evil choices exercised by the free will of men, but the Father brought the greatest of good out of this greatest of evil. On the third day, the Lord Jesus resurrected from the dead, giving hope to all of us that one day our bodies will likewise resurrect from the dead. This is the plan of God, bringing life out of death, so that all of us who believe and share in the message and life of Christ will be resurrected on the last day to be with our God forever, in bodily form, and not just in soul.I am quite sincere in asking all these things. We believe it was very bad that was done with the man of God (Jesus) and those who did it, they paid high price too. So that should be enough.
The circumstances are elaborated nicely in Deuteronomy 18:6-20. That is called Fornication. If a man and a woman married under the condition of fornication, that marriage is unlawful. Thus, no marriage at all. Thus, if separated, it is not a divorce.**One man - One woman is the best way. But it should not be extremely strict because conditions vary. Conditions demand sometime that a man may have to marry more than one.
The only other solution would be to divorce the first wife which is also not good. The church is against the divorce too. But in mathew ch.19 it is allowed under special circumstances. There is a case in which a divorce may be necessary.
**
paarsurrey,Hi
I think it is not difficult to understand.
Muhammad never wrote or authored Quran. Allah read it to Muhammad through an angel and Muhammad memorised it by heart. OK
Perhaps it might work, if the reader chose only to read what he wrote (after awhile it just appeared to be repetition) and ignored what the rest of the posters had written.He believes that after throwing 1.000 unsupported childish claims, he can get one convert.
**What you have written is correct. You believe this. You believe that. And you want to believe this. You do not want to believe that. This is your religion. I do not want to disturb you in your beliefs. But I have to show you, respectfully, what you are really doing. You are following your own desires. Please do not mind. You have told it all yourself, above. Thank you. **.paarsurrey,
We believe that God IS the Holy Spirit and God IS Jesus, all 3 are the same
We believe that the Holy Spirit guided the writers of the Gospels to accurately record the teachings of Jesus without any error
We believe that the Council that put the Bible together, the Books that we now know are the Bible, were guided by the Holy Spirit(God) so they chose the correct Books
We believe we know the Truth
This is also true and correct. May be we do not understand your way of christianity. But we are sincere in all our questions / objections. We are not cooking anything up to disturb you. There are real problems with your beliefs. You just believed all things without any reasons and rejected all other things without any reasons. ..This all seems to be something you aren’t quite grasping
You seem to argue your point with us, but with the wrong idea of what we consider Christianity to be
To err is human. Forgiveness is divine. But errors can be corrected. Sins can be forgiven. It is no use saying that only one man in the world did not err.You mention many times in your posts that men are not supposed to be perfect, that men are supposed to err
How then could muhammed hear the Koran, and memorise it by heart, until he could later get it all down in writing?
If he could do this, and if u believe he could do this, then why is it so improbable as u say it is, for the Gospel writers to have not been able to do it?
please please please start understanding Catholicism, and history before you start telling us what is wrong with it
I have to agree with you. Using the koran to discuss Jesus doesn’t make sense to me.I have to admit that I do have a testimony of Jesus Christ as Lord, but still having trouble with which faith to believe in
All I know is that you would have to prayerfully read the NT to get a testimony of Jesus Christ.
You need to post more to back up your assertions.
If you want to say the Bible is corrupted, then you need to prove it. Please don’t use the koran to prove it since that is based on an illiterate pagan.
Otherwise, just stating your belief isn’t too much to go on. Why do you think that?
Those others who wrote about Him were witnesses to Jesus’ miracles and His teachings. He appeared to them after He Resurrected. St. Paul was visited by Him so he would spread the Word to others who were not Jewish. mohammed had no miracle, no one saw him when he saw some angel and even blamed a little puppy when the angel didn’t appear before others. Like an Angel of the Lord would be frightened over one of His creatures! A little puppy.
And the ironic thing about all of this is that when we do quote surahs and hadiths to muslims - they squirm since so many of them are so violent, and filled with mohammed’s sexual escapades with wives and slaves (women and children).
And you are notorious for trying to rewrite the koran. There are 5 accepted translations and your not included among them.
- Pickthall
- Yusuf Ali
- alhilali Khan
- Shakir
and I forget the last one.
parrusurry, bill pick here did you in one of your post offer to get me a new pc because my key board was not working…believe this we can make a deal…smile, have a good weekendforums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4745582&postcount=42
A gentle correction on what is necessary to be a Christian
Hi
The above does not represent views of all the non-Catholics. I love Jesus and his true teachings but I don’t believe that Jesus was ever a god who became man. Jesus had no explicit claim to it except some obscure statements narrated by others who misunderstood him. This is my sincere opinion, however, no disrespect is intended to anybody’s faith or creed.
I love Jesus and Krishna
Thanks
Jesus said that there was one reason to divorce and wthat would be adultery.One man - One woman is the best way. But it should not be extremely strict because conditions vary. Conditions demand sometime that a man may have to marry more than one.
The only other solution would be to divorce the first wife which is also not good. The church is against the divorce too. But in mathew ch.19 it is allowed under special circumstances. There is a case in which a divorce may be necessary.
Would the christians (Catholics) please admit that there is an exception to the rule of “No divorce”??
paarsurrey, u didnt actually answer anything i just said in my post**What you have written is correct. You believe this. You believe that. And you want to believe this. You do not want to believe that. This is your religion. I do not want to disturb you in your beliefs. But I have to show you, respectfully, what you are really doing. You are following your own desires. Please do not mind. You have told it all yourself, above. Thank you. **.
This is also true and correct. May be we do not understand your way of christianity. But we are sincere in all our questions / objections. We are not cooking anything up to disturb you. There are real problems with your beliefs. You just believed all things without any reasons and rejected all other things without any reasons. ..
To err is human. Forgiveness is divine. But errors can be corrected. Sins can be forgiven. It is no use saying that only one man in the world did not err.
First of all how do you know the meaning of his true teachings without being Catholic. The Catholic church was setup by GOD with the guidance of the Holy Spirit in giving us the understanding of his true teaching.forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4745582&postcount=42
A gentle correction on what is necessary to be a Christian
Hi
The above does not represent views of all the non-Catholics. I love Jesus and his true teachings but I don’t believe that Jesus was ever a god who became man. Jesus had no explicit claim to it except some obscure statements narrated by others who misunderstood him. This is my sincere opinion, however, no disrespect is intended to anybody’s faith or creed.
I love Jesus and Krishna
Thanks
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4745582&postcount=42
A gentle correction on what is necessary to be a Christian
Hi
The above does not represent views of all the non-Catholics. I love Jesus and his true teachings but I don’t believe that Jesus was ever a god who became man. Jesus had no explicit claim to it except some obscure statements narrated by others who misunderstood him. This is my sincere opinion, however, no disrespect is intended to anybody’s faith or creed.
Gabriel of 12;
Jesus is the only man who was witnessed to Heal the sick, give sight to the blind, heal the lepers, raise the dead by speaking his “Word”, forgive sins, even the wind and the storm obey his command, not to mention Jesus walked on “Water”, rebuked demons and excorcised demons from humans, Jesus was crucified, died and was buried after the third day many witnessed his resurrection from the dead and his ascension into heaven.
What is interesting here, since then the followers of Jesus went to their deaths proclaiming this “Truth” by believing Jesus was fully human and fully divine from all walks of life under torture, and martyrdom. What fool would go to his death willingly if Jesus was not God incarnate? The prophets spoke well of those who would deny God even though God himself would take life, bury it, and raise it again.
Peace
A gentle correction on what is necessary to be a Christianpaarsurrey;4745616 said:
Hi
The above does not represent views of all the non-Catholics. I love Jesus and his true teachings but I don’t believe that Jesus was ever a god who became man. Jesus had no explicit claim to it except some obscure statements narrated by others who misunderstood him. This is my sincere opinion, however, no disrespect is intended to anybody’s faith or creed.
Gabriel of 12;
Jesus is the only man who was witnessed to Heal the sick, give sight to the blind, heal the lepers, raise the dead by speaking his “Word”, forgive sins, even the wind and the storm obey his command, not to mention Jesus walked on “Water”, rebuked demons and excorcised demons from humans, Jesus was crucified, died and was buried after the third day many witnessed his resurrection from the dead and his ascension into heaven.
What is interesting here, since then the followers of Jesus went to their deaths proclaiming this “Truth” by believing Jesus was fully human and fully divine from all walks of life under torture, and martyrdom. What fool would go to his death willingly if Jesus was not God incarnate? The prophets spoke well of those who would deny God even though God himself would take life, bury it, and raise it again.
Peace
**This post and the previous from Rob, it is alright to believe that Jesus is God. There is no bar on any belief. After all the idol worshippers also have a belief with out foundation. They just believe. So do the christians.
The religion and idea of God did not start with Jesus. One has to see the previous scripture too. God had been revealing himself to many other nations since very long time. The idea of a man God is not fit for belief.
Jesus did many miracles. These are mentioned in the Quran too. But please do not mix the real things with metaphorics and parables. There are many symbolic things that church has taken as real, such as son of God and God.
As long as Jesus was around, he was the beloved of God and could be said to be a beloved son of God (metaphorically). He could be a God on earth too (Symbolically). The only one representing God here. But that was all. Please do not take those words as real.
Miracles have taken place in the time of every prophet of God. Even in the time of Noah a.s when the people were denying the truth and abusing Noah, God had shown the greatest miracle of the Ark and drowned all the rascals.
Same was in the time of Joseph son of Jacob, in the time of Moses too. How Moses was saved from the water soon after birth, and how he crossed the sea safely with his people?. See? The miracles of the Hindus are much greater in their power (strength).
The church teachings are false such as the original sin, all people, all prophets are sinful except Jesus. There is no one a God except Jesus.
Nobody would believe those things. It would be like being a pagan. Please think over and ask all such things from the Jews too. They are the predecessors of the christians. Do they have such beliefs? never.**