T
thomasjj70
Guest
I am a parish 8th Grade Religious Education Teacher. We pass out anonymous surveys at the beginning of the year to determine where our students are in their faith. We usually receive about 4-5(out of 30 students) that they struggle-don’t believe in God because of science. We try to plant seeds throughout the year on this topic.
After every class the students turn in an anonymous index card;
I chose the following vides as they were simple and I thought they introduced the arguments well:
As an example, in the Cosmological Argument, the video’s Conclusion is God. One of the students asked, does it really need to be God. I said that is an excellent observation, and that is oftentimes an objection to the conclusion. I then said logically speaking, I would move that discussion upon hearing that objection to a discussion on what would be the properties or the attributes of that something that could create the Universe, and me being a Catholic, those attributes are very similar to attributes of God.
One of the index-card feedbacks that I received after class stated, “I cannot wait to debunk Christianity”. I am questioning whether to respond to it or let it die on the vine. I am more inclined to think this is a Childish tantrum of sorts, remembering this is a public school educated 8th Grader, poorly catechized, who with all likelihood is forced to attend religious education and is deeply resentful of that, to begin with.
God Bless and thank you for your feedback and advice,
Thank God for Thomas Aquinas LOL !!!
Tom
After every class the students turn in an anonymous index card;
- What we could have done better.
- What they liked.
- How they would make it better
- An opportunity to ask a question.
I chose the following vides as they were simple and I thought they introduced the arguments well:
- The Kalam Cosmological Argument and the video by Dr. Craig:
- The Fine-Tuning Argument and a video by Dr. Craig:
As an example, in the Cosmological Argument, the video’s Conclusion is God. One of the students asked, does it really need to be God. I said that is an excellent observation, and that is oftentimes an objection to the conclusion. I then said logically speaking, I would move that discussion upon hearing that objection to a discussion on what would be the properties or the attributes of that something that could create the Universe, and me being a Catholic, those attributes are very similar to attributes of God.
One of the index-card feedbacks that I received after class stated, “I cannot wait to debunk Christianity”. I am questioning whether to respond to it or let it die on the vine. I am more inclined to think this is a Childish tantrum of sorts, remembering this is a public school educated 8th Grader, poorly catechized, who with all likelihood is forced to attend religious education and is deeply resentful of that, to begin with.
- I am thinking of highlighting how all our approaches should be an approach for truth, that we are Catholics and are called not to follow things blindly.
- I also was thinking that this statement indicates perhaps a goal that might not be the pursuit of truth, but to confirm one’s preconceived opinions.
- That it is my experience that when one believes they have philosophical debunked something, oftentimes they have debunked a caricature(straw man) and not the real premice.
God Bless and thank you for your feedback and advice,
Thank God for Thomas Aquinas LOL !!!
Tom