I was actually going in and editing my last post when you posted this, so we crossed in passing…
Anyone who thinks fear of eternal separation from God means living life according to the quoted part below is obviously unstable:
"If this is blasphemous, I’m sorry, but it isn’t meant to be.
…
I just don’t believe that anymore."
Aha! Thank you! Now I think I understand your concern, I think.
Maybe we don’t disagree at all.
About my comment about being blasphemous: I try not to be presumptuous, and as an engineer I am very careful – some might say “paranoid” – to I acknowledge what I don’t know.
The part I was concerned might be blasphemous, other posters have told me that I was actually incorrect so I guess it was a valid concern. I was actually referring to my immediate previous statement:
“… and if that isn’t good enough and God sends me to hell, then at least I can take comfort in knowing that He sent His own Son there, too – at least for a while.”
I have been corrected on this, and I acknowledge that it is apparently wrong theologically, and at least glib – if not blasphemous. I guessed I kind of sensed that might be the case, which is why I added the disclaimer in the first place … I do tend to get carried away at times.
As far as the rest of my quote of your concern, I’d like to examine two aspects of your comment. Maybe we have no real differences to reconcile, except perhaps rhetorically as I mentioned earlier…
Anyone who thinks fear of eternal separation from God means living life according to the quoted part below is obviously unstable:
About your phrase “fear of eternal separation from God” I still don’t know exactly what you mean, but if you are talking about a “healthy fear” or however you would explain it like other posters, then I have no problem with that, as I also explained above.
But disregarding the terminology issue, “living life according to the quoted part below is obviously unstable” NOW I think I can FULLY agree with you.
It clearly is an unstable way to think. Nevertheless, and I don’t know your age but I was in grade school in the late 60s and early 70s, with mostly nuns as teachers – who were overall great but a few often seemed angry and bitter – and this was very much the way we were trained. I say “trained,” not “taught.” That’s because, and it seems to match the experience of other of my old grade school classmates with whom I am in contact via facebook and even other posters here who grew up at the same time, they didn’t really 'teach" us religion at all.
Sure, we heard a few Bible stories like about Jonah and Moses, but only from “Children’s Bibles” which were very watered down and feel-goodish. We never cracked open an “actual” Bible in eight years – not like they do nowadays. They taught us essentially nothing about Church teachings, except for the very strict physical behavior we were to observe, such as the proper way to receive Communion. Our actual “religion” books were practically devoid of any “religion” at all. They were mostly secular commentary on political issues of the day, such as racism and the rising spectre of drug abuse, or exercises where we were to take a very abstract picture and describe “what we saw” in them – kind of a psychological experiment but not Church teaching.
If we answered a question wrong, we would be scolded and/or made fun of, and the giggles of other students were often not only tolerated but expected as part of the punishment. And you had DARE NOT ask what you did wrong, or you’d get “you know VERY well what you did, young man,” and in my case on more than one occasion after asking what I did wrong, I was literally pulled by the ear, by my teacher, into the next classroom and the nun tugging me interrupted the class and called out in front of the other class and to its teacher, “We cannot deal with this disrespectful child! Maybe if he sits in YOUR room for a while he’ll learn something!”
And as far as fear of hell? That was a CONSTANT threat for the entire class: “You may get away with something behind my back, but you can’t get it past GOD and He WILL punish you forever in hell!” or “I don’t know why I even come to this class some days when it seems like you are all going to end up in hell!”
Some older people say they were taught in no uncertain terms that anyone who was not baptized into the Catholic Church WOULD go to hell; and they grew up in constant dread for their non-Catholic friends’ eternal souls.
So, back to your point, YES! THAT sort of fear of hell makes a VERY unstable person, and in fact it contributed greatly to my severe psychotic episode that had its greatest onset in 2001, just a month before I met my first “spiritual director” who helped put me at peace and got me on the path to a more healthy view of Catholic teachings and the spiritual journey. I’m happy to say that the Lord has seen fit to heal me of this, deeply and convincingly. I’ll shout for joy from the rooftops! :extrahappy:
Honestly, a large part of what I know about “true” Catholic teachings I have learned via CAF, and for that I will be forever grateful to CA.
So yes, what I was describing was a VERY unhealthy and unstable way to view our faith, but I see all too much evidence that such thinking is behind quite a few of the more fearful and scrupulous posters here on CAF.
Oh, no, another too-long post. This time I think I’ll take just a few more minutes and edit it down some instead of splitting it.
Alan