E
EasterJoy
Guest
St. Paul spoke to this situation directly, so there is no reason to extrapolate from a situation where a missionary is sent out to preach to total strangers:Juliane,
I understand that Jesus meant that when the Disciples entered a town and if those in that town rejected the teachings or such then the Disciples were to “brush the dust from their sandals”. But in my view (which of course could be wrong) the premises is that if you are moving towards God, living as Jesus teaches us to, you should not allow others to cause you to stop following your faith, or cause you to turn away (directly or indirectly).
And yes Jesus also said in Matthew 19,9: that if a man (spouse) divorces their wife (spouse), except for adultery, and marries another he (she) themselves commit adultery. Showing that divorce is not the answer when things are “troublesome”.
Hence talking to a Priest – and being totally honest is the best course of action. The best we can do is offer support and understanding, not (again in my opinion) tell someone how they should live.
Winter
To the rest I say (not the Lord): if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she is willing to go on living with him, he should not divorce her; and if any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he is willing to go on living with her, she should not divorce her husband. For the unbelieving husband is made holy through his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy through the brother. Otherwise your children would be unclean, whereas in fact they are holy. If the unbeliever separates, however, let him separate. The brother or sister is not bound in such cases; God has called you to peace. For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband; or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife? Only, everyone should live as the Lord has assigned, just as God called each one. I give this order in all the churches.
1 Cor. 7:12-17
If the OPs husband is baptized, he is not an unbeliever for the purposes of determining the nature of the marriage. Even if he is not baptized, though, there is a limit to whether or not the Catholic party could obtain a dissolution of the marriage (which, because one spouse is not baptized, is not sacramental.)
I would think this a better explanation than I could do: canonlawmadeeasy.com/2013/04/04/what-is-the-pauline-privilege/