I have a question about the STD's situation

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBlackGhost
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TheBlackGhost

Guest
Everyone here is pro- not having sex untill after marriage, so I guess this reduces STD’s or whatever. But my question which has yet to be answered by anyone is what about people currently with STD’s? What are we suppose to do with them? Segregate them?
 
treat them medically. If they are contagious they cannot have sex, ever, until the STD has been eradicated. For an infected person to have sex with another is assault, a violation of the 5th commandment as well as the 6th. Condoms do a pitifully poor job of preventing the spread of STD and to teach otherwise is medical malpractice.
 
But many STD’s are not fully treatable, and even if they are treated can still be spread.
 
quite, so these unfortunate individuals may not have sex. they join the many other folks who cannot have sex for various reasons: age, illness, disability, impotence, or simply not married for whatever reason. news flash: it is possible to live a quite full, happy, fulfilled live without sex.
 
Why would anyone, regardless of your beliefs on pre-martial sex (which IMO is wrong, but not the point here) knowing have sex, knowing you have an STD. That is just plain wrong. If you had the Flu would you go around on purpose coughing on people? Get it treated, if you can not, then abstain.
 
A person with an STD and still continues to have sex with other people is a selfish person in my book. Think about it, the infected person has the GALL to jeopardize his or her partner’s life just for their own selfish pleasure. Even if the infected person is not religious, then they should be having sex just out of plain common sense and courtesy. When I have a cold I don’t come to work and cough all over my co-workers just because I didn’t want to use a sick day. I stay home until I’m well so no one else gets sick.

I also second puzzleannie’s “newsflash.”
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
quite, so these unfortunate individuals may not have sex. they join the many other folks who cannot have sex for various reasons: age, illness, disability, impotence, or simply not married for whatever reason. news flash: it is possible to live a quite full, happy, fulfilled live without sex.
Click to expand...
Happy and fulfilled? What kind of dream land are you living in? I doubt you would be saying that if you were in this situation. My head would explode if I was, at least I have the guts to admit it. Happy, please. Just knowing I didn’t have the option would kill me.
 
I’ve never known anyone who actually died (or exploded) because they couldn’t have sex. :rotfl:

I learn something new every day. :nope:
 
40.png
TheBlackGhost:
Happy and fulfilled? What kind of dream land are you living in? I doubt you would be saying that if you were in this situation. My head would explode if I was, at least I have the guts to admit it. Happy, please. Just knowing I didn’t have the option would kill me.
Click to expand...
You must be young and/or male.

Really, life can be happy and fulfilling without sex, especially when you are with God. Living the life of Jesus is very, very satisfying, rewarding, loving and fulfilling. How can one not be happy knowing they are serving God well?
 
Maybe because I’m not Catholic : (

Perhaps if I convert again my wildest dreams shall come true!

And yeah heads to explode, it happens.
 
Hmm…lets see…born in December 1989…that means you are 15 years old and don’t know have the slightest clue about the maturity of sex and what it may or may not entail. :nope:
 
Oh yeah and I was talking about the knowledge about not being able to, not the actual thing. Anticipation and knowing what would happen is the worse part of anything, not the actual event. Alright maybe not everything, because I know someone is gonna come and is required to prove me wrong with some out-theory, in most things, anticipation is the worse.
 
I’m sorry. I think we are getting a bit stray from the subject anyway. I don’t even remember how we got into this convorsation.
 
40.png
TheBlackGhost:
Oh yeah and I was talking about the knowledge about not being able to, not the actual thing. Anticipation and knowing what would happen is the worse part of anything, not the actual event. Alright maybe not everything, because I know someone is gonna come and is required to prove me wrong with some out-theory, in most things, anticipation is the worse.
Click to expand...
This doesn’t make ANY sense.
 
40.png
TheBlackGhost:
Oh yeah and I was talking about the knowledge about not being able to, not the actual thing. Anticipation and knowing what would happen is the worse part of anything, not the actual event. Alright maybe not everything, because I know someone is gonna come and is required to prove me wrong with some out-theory, in most things, anticipation is the worse.
Click to expand...
I guess you could look up some stories aobut Catholic paraplegics then, the kind who were born perfectly healthy but due to automobile or sports accidents or acts of war ended up in wheelchairs never to be able to consummate a marriage. You might learn a lot from them and their faith.
 
The thing about the STD situation, though, getting back to the thread topic…is why people are so offended to actually have to endure consequences for their choices in life.

Play with fire, get burned, live with the consequences - whatever they may be.

Some STDs are curable. Some are treatable and allow one to be non-contagious for stretches at a time. Others are incurable. In any case, responsibility and concern for the other party to whom one wants to give themselves to should take priority over fulfilling one’s own sexual desire or release of sexual tension.
 
40.png
StratusRose:
This doesn’t make ANY sense.
Click to expand...
Seriously? You must be a bad reader. I mean I probably could of made it look better, but I stated the whole point of the post maybe like 3 times. So if that didn’t make ANY sense to you try not to respond, because you didn’t contribute anything.
 
40.png
TheBlackGhost:
Seriously? You must be a bad reader. I mean I probably could of made it look better, but I stated the whole point of the post maybe like 3 times. So if that didn’t make ANY sense to you try not to respond, because you didn’t contribute anything.
Click to expand...
Check the rudeness factor in your posts, BlackGhost…there’s no call to respond that way.

You may have stated your points 3 times but it wasn’t a coherent read, one has to reread it a couple of times to understand where you were coming from.
 
To commit sexual acts with another when you have an incurable STD is tantamount to attempted murder.
 
Im a seventeen year old male and i can say that not all teen males share in blackghosts opinion. I dont understand why it would be so hard to be happy without having sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top