R
RosslynV
Guest
Pope Benedicts resignation was unpresidented. (Sp?) IMO it wasn’t Christ’s intention to have a Pope emeritus and a reigning Pope.
It was not unprecedented. In fact a saint did it as well. How is it that you can presume to know Christ’s intention with the Church and in specific the Chair of Peter? You claim a greater understanding of the papacy and Christ than HH Pope Emeritus BXVI?Pope Benedicts resignation was unpresidented. (Sp?) IMO it wasn’t Christ’s intention to have a Pope emeritus and a reigning Pope.
Hmmmm you are not criticizing Saint John Paul the second are you? Turn the affairs of the Church BACK over? to the hierarchy to run as they see fit? When has this happened before?It would be a greater mess to have a Pope, knowing that he was physically unable to serve, turn the affairs of the Church back over to the Vatican hierarchy to run things as they see fit.
Amen, although I understood why pope Benedict xvi resigned. Was it hurtful sure, but yet the man knew that new blood needed to take the post.I’m of the opinion that the Pope should serve for life. I can understand His Holiness Pope Francis wanting to resign in a few years but like some others on here I do not believe that resignation should be the norm. I would hope the successor to our current Pope will serve for life. Currently though, Pope Francis is doing a humble and great job guiding the church that Christ founded. God bless our Pope!![]()
I can’t respond until I know what it is you are saying. Are you saying that BXVI wen’t against the Will of God when he resigned? Are you claiming to be more in tune with theological issues such as this that you supplant your opinion over that of the Church? Because the Church, the Church of Christ disagrees with your assessment. It is not given to BXVI AND Francis, right now it is Just the successor to Peter, Francis. Or of you of the mind that there are two reigning Popes. That actually has happened more often than you think…Hoosier Daddy, thanks for the spelling correction…the purpose of an internet forum, for the most part, is to offer up an opinion. That’s my take on the situation and you are free to give a rebuttal. You didn’t mention much of substance to refute my opinion. I don’t know the exact numbers but I would guess that 95% of all popes have died during their respective papacies. So this would be the traditional and I dare say the normal way a pope passes on his reign. In scripture, Jesus said to Peter, and I’m paraphrasing, you are Peter and upon this rock I shall build my Church. Jesus used the singular. Moreover, Jesus didn’t say, you are peter, and you are john, and upon such rocks I build my church.
Hoosier Daddy was correcting your assertion that papal resignation was unprecedented by providing an example of a prior Pope resigning. “Unprecedented” means that something has never been done before. Since Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was not the first Pope to resign, your statement was incorrect.Hoosier Daddy, thanks for the spelling correction…the purpose of an internet forum, for the most part, is to offer up an opinion. That’s my take on the situation and you are free to give a rebuttal. You didn’t mention much of substance to refute my opinion. I don’t know the exact numbers but I would guess that 95% of all popes have died during their respective papacies. So this would be the traditional and I dare say the normal way a pope passes on his reign.
Wouldn’t this just demonstrate that the Lord willed his Church to have a single, authoritative shepherd at any given time? Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI has resigned his office, and Pope Francis is the sole individual holding that office today. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI retains the title “Pope” out of respect, but it carries with it zero doctrinal, dogmatic, or ecclesiastical privileges. Benedict XVI is simply a Bishop among Bishops (who just so happens to have at one time been the Bishop of Rome).In scripture, Jesus said to Peter, and I’m paraphrasing, you are Peter and upon this rock I shall build my Church. Jesus used the singular. Moreover, Jesus didn’t say, you are peter, and you are john, and upon such rocks I build my church.
Hoosier Daddy, thanks for the spelling correction…the purpose of an internet forum, for the most part, is to offer up an opinion. That’s my take on the situation and you are free to give a rebuttal. You didn’t mention much of substance to refute my opinion. I don’t know the exact numbers but I would guess that 95% of all popes have died during their respective papacies. So this would be the traditional and I dare say the normal way a pope passes on his reign. In scripture, Jesus said to Peter, and I’m paraphrasing, you are Peter and upon this rock I shall build my Church. Jesus used the singular. Moreover, Jesus didn’t say, you are peter, and you are john, and upon such rocks I build my church.
I would agree that it is not and should not be the “norm” But is it acceptable, and permissible by Christ? I would say so! So would Saint Celestine. your 95 percent means nothing. ~ .5% 1/266 Popes are from the southern half of the world.I don’t know the exact numbers but I would guess that 95% of all popes have died during their respective papacies. So this would be the traditional and I dare say the normal way a pope passes on his reign.
Yes, not only that but many diocese have a Bishop Emeritus residing in them right now. Mine does. And that Bishop is not -co Bishop with the current one. Much like the Bishop of Rome does not share the office with the Bishop Emeritus of Rome.Hoosier Daddy was correcting your assertion that papal resignation was unprecedented by providing an example of a prior Pope resigning. “Unprecedented” means that something has never been done before. Since Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was not the first Pope to resign, your statement was incorrect.
Wouldn’t this just demonstrate that the Lord willed his Church to have a single, authoritative shepherd at any given time? Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI has resigned his office, and Pope Francis is the sole individual holding that office today. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI retains the title “Pope” out of respect, but it carries with it zero doctrinal, dogmatic, or ecclesiastical privileges. Benedict XVI is simply a Bishop among Bishops (who just so happens to have at one time been the Bishop of Rome).
Having checked the Wikipedia article for “Papal Resignation”, I notice that the earliest such resignation was in 235 AD with the most recent being 1415 AD (keeping aside Benedict XVI’s resignation). To me that indicates there’s good, consistent precedent for the resignation of Popes (even if such is not normative). Furthermore, the same article cites both the 1917 and 1983 Codes of Canon Law where resignation of a Pope is mentioned. That such is mentioned at all in the Code of Canon Law, even long after Papal resignation became essentially a thing of the past leads me to believe that the Catholic Church has always understood that Popes can and do resign.
Well, the nice thing about predicting death, disaster, and catastrophe is that eventually you’ll be right!My grandfather has been saying for at least a decade that he probably only had a couple more years to live… he’s 92 now. God is in control of that, just like He is in control of our Holy Father’s life and ultimate death.
I agree with this, i do not think it is horrible for a Pope to resign, it has happened before but just as the above mentions, it seems more like a secular thing for pope to resign one after the other, like they can simply just give up, keep in mind i am not criticizing any Bishop or the Pope, i just hope it doesn’t ever become the norm.I recently read an article in which I wholeheartedly agree. Altho he has many duties and demands, the pope is by far more important in who he is, than in what he does. The symbol of his office is primary and as long as he is breathing, he fulfills that office in some capacity. Thou art Peter and upon this ROCK I will build my Church. Rock, symbolizing strength, unity, perpetuity and consistency. It would be disturbing to me if this would become the norm and more than slightly reminiscent of secular office when one grows too weak to do the job albeit without benefit of spiritual considerations.