C
Cairone
Guest
This statement should be very enlightening of what your problem is. I suspect, though granted I have no evidence, that in truth you’re not looking for reasons to believe in God, but in reasons to disbelieve. Otherwise, why limit yourself to the five senses and/or indisputable historical evidence? Especially given that the Christian God is a spiritual being, where spirit isn’t perceivable by the five sense. Also, the indisputable historical evidence part should also lend strength to the reasons for your disbelief: what is indisputable? Almost always, someone asking for “indisputable” evidence has a priori decided that there is no such thing, and thus cannot be swayed by any argument.I need to be able to verify it with at least one of the five senses that god supposedly blessed us with and/or indisputable archeological/historical evidence.
I don’t mean to sound harsh or condescending here, and I apologize immediately if I have offended. I make these statements not only because I’ve encountered numerous apologists who will say the same thing, but because I was also there myself, at one point in time. I wanted to be able to prove the existence of God beyond a shadow of a doubt. In fact, I thought I could, given time and learning, eventually learn everything about everything. In this, I tipped towards agnosticism and even at time outright atheism because over time it seemed increasingly impossible to make that proof. And if I couldn’t make that proof, the certainly that should have been sufficient cause to disbelieve in God.
The problem? Pride was in the way. In order for me to accept the existence of God, I had to swallow my pride accept that there were some things that simply could not be proved. Now, that does not mean that there aren’t very reasonable and very persuasive arguments for the existence of God, and some that come very close to concrete proofs, though there are holes. But that’s besides the point. Pride lay between me and God.
If you truly wish for help in finding faith in God, then the first thing you need to do is identify exactly what is at stake. Find out what you think you lose if you have faith in God. Meditate on this. Take your time. Are there things God calls you to do that you don’t want to do? For example, does God want you to be chaste, but you don’t want to be? (This was another stumbling block for me, a very significant one, but one I couldn’t even acknowledge until pride had been humbled. Quite forcibly, actually.) Do all the devotions seem like a hassle? Do you have peers whose respect you fear you’ll lose by proclaiming faith in God? It doesn’t have to be any of these, but I think there’s a reason there, a significant one.
Don’t content yourself with falling back on: “If I accept God, I’m accepting something on blind faith, completely without evidence.” The reason there seems to be no evidence is not because there isn’t any, but because you a priori reject any evidence there is.
That’s quite an extraordinary claim, claiming that extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Where’s your extraordinary evidence of that? Of course, what even qualifies as an extraordinary claim, or extraordinary evidence?Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence and that is completely lacking in my opinion.
I don’t mean to be flip here. I’m simply pointing out one major flaw in your argument. (cf Extraordinary Evidence Fallacy by Jimmy Akin.) But the key thing to realize is that in your first post alone you:
- Posit that belief in God requires extraordinary evidence
- Deny that any evidence but ordinary sensory or indisputable historical evidence will suffice.
Please. Take my recommendation and meditate on exactly what you stand to lose if you believe in God. Only once you realize what stands in your way will you be capable of making an honest assessment of evidence and reason.
I will add my prayers for you, as well.
Cairone