M
MarkInOregon
Guest
I think you should engage in a discussion with someone knowledgable–maybe through these forums–regarding each dogma listed. I realize you say you do “understand” but I for one would like to know what you have studied to gain your understanding–and how you interpret what you have studied and how that has led to your rejection of the dogmas cited–i.e. you studied xyz and that led to rejection of abc arguments for Dogma X and led to mnop arguments in support of rejecting Dogma X.I
I reject Purgatory because it mocks the Passion and Death of Our Lord Jesus Christ and what He did for us.
- Papal Primacy AND Jurisdiction
- Papal Infallibility
- Catholic Soteriology IE the Council of Trent and the Catholic Dogmas and teaching on “Justification”
- Purgatory
Let me just re-emphasise that I DO UNDERSTAND those Dogmas, I simply cannot accept them So I ask both the Catholics and non-Catholics to respond and give me your (name removed by moderator)ut/advice etc. What should I do?
For example–your statement regarding Purgatory mocking the passion and death of Our Lord Jesus Christ–I am currious about. It seems to me to show a lack of understanding about Purgatory. I fail to see how it “mocks”. I, for one, would be currious to follow your course of study, and how that study led to this conclusion and to your rejection of the dogma. Might be informative to both of us.
I believe each of those discussions should be their own thread. I think you owe it to yourself to investigate further and make sure you fully understand the dogma. Many men and women–smarter than you or I have studied these same dogmas and come to a much different conclusion. I accept the dogma of transubstantiation–even though it is beyond my capacity to understand it. I accept it because through my study I have come to accept the teaching authority of the Church and I take Christ at his word–doesn’t mean I understand it though. Lots of things I accept though I don’t understand them–like a lot of physics.
Peace,
Mark
