I was converted from Catholicism to Christ at the age of 19.

  • Thread starter Thread starter vichlopet
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Only unbelievers are unsanctified.
So, since it would not be possible for a believer to “interrupt sanctification”, or to die before he is completely sanctified in this life, how does the issue even come up?
 
So, since it would not be possible for a believer to “interrupt sanctification”, or to die before he is completely sanctified in this life, how does the issue even come up?
It’s come about from the original discussion on losing grace.
 
“Falling from grace.” Doesn’t grace “sanctify?”
Yes.

Which is why, if you fall from grace, and your sanctification gets “interrupted”, you are no longer on the path to Heaven. Since (as you so eloquently point out) only unbelievers are unsanctified, which means that an interruption in one’s sanctification places one on the path towards unbelief.

Yes, or yes? 😃
 
Yes.

Which is why, if you fall from grace, and your sanctification gets “interrupted”, you are no longer on the path to Heaven. Since (as you so eloquently point out) only unbelievers are unsanctified, which means that an interruption in one’s sanctification places one on the path towards unbelief.

Yes, or yes? 😃
No.

Salvation is on the basis of grace, Judith; that’s why sin cannot destroy salvation; if sin can destroy salvation then salvation is no longer on the basis of grace, but on the basis of works.
 
The Orthodox believe that we are all born into the state of grace, but they wouldn’t have the Sacrament of Reconciliation if they thought we couldn’t lose it by means of personal sin.
And this is where the “Orthodox” and RC’ism veer off from the Apostolic gospel of grace concerning the forgiveness of ALL sins through the power of the cross.Col 2:13-14 "When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross."This was the ancient way of publicly stating that a debt was paid in full.

This side of the cross, sin is not the issue. Belief is the issue regarding salvation and the forgiveness of sins. To add to it is an act of unbelief.
 
No.

Salvation is on the basis of grace, Judith; that’s why sin cannot destroy salvation; if sin can destroy salvation then salvation is no longer on the basis of grace, but on the basis of works.
You’re defining “grace” arbitrarily and unbiblically. Nowhere in the New Testament is persistence in deliberate sin described as being compatible with the reception of grace. Your grace is not grace at all but a form of “cooking the books.” The grace that matters is the grace that transforms even as it forgives. Yes, our transformation is always incomplete and we have to ask for forgiveness every day. No one is disputing that.

Edwin
 
That is in response to the incident, my friend. If you like, I can provide pages and pages of patristic consensus.
The Psalm is a secondary response subsequent to the initial response, and God provides that in one verse, 2 Sam 12:13, so what use has anyone for pages and pages of Patristic consensus? :hmmm:
 
And this is where the “Orthodox” and RC’ism veer off from the Apostolic gospel of grace…
No. It is where you veer off from the Apostolic teaching of the Apostolic Church as you twist teachings through a reformer’s lens.

…a man has no right to be called faithful, if his faith is a bare word and if he has not in him a faith made active by love or the Spirit. Thus faith must be made evident by progress in works, or it must act in the light and shine in works, as the divine Apostle says: ‘Shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works’ (James 2:18), thus showing that the faith of grace is made evident by works performed in accordance with the commandments, just as the commandments are fulfilled in deed and are made bright through the faith which is in grace.
St. Gregory of Sinai
 
You’re defining “grace” arbitrarily and unbiblically. Nowhere in the New Testament is persistence in deliberate sin described as being compatible with the reception of grace. Your grace is not grace at all but a form of “cooking the books.” The grace that matters is the grace that transforms even as it forgives. Yes, our transformation is always incomplete and we have to ask for forgiveness every day. No one is disputing that.

Edwin
I didn’t say that “persistence in deliberate sin is compatible with the reception of grace;” you’ve inferred that. Neither did I offer a definition of grace; you’ve inferred that as well.
 
No.

Salvation is on the basis of grace, Judith; that’s why sin cannot destroy salvation; if sin can destroy salvation then salvation is no longer on the basis of grace, but on the basis of works.
But if you fall out of grace, then what? Can grace save you, if you are not in it?

Sin causes us to fall out of grace; you have already posted the verse that shows us this. (Galatians 5:4)
 
The Psalm is a secondary response subsequent to the initial response, and God provides that in one verse, 2 Sam 12:13, so what use has anyone for pages and pages of Patristic consensus?
Oh, now it is a secondary response–back peddling again eh?

I did not think you would want the patristic intrepretation of the Psalm.

Afterall, you have your own interpretation. 👍
 
It may happen that for a certain time a man is illumined and refreshed by God’s grace, and then this grace is withdrawn. This makes him inwardly confused and he starts to grumble; instead of seeking through steadfast prayer to recover his assurance of salvation, he loses patience and gives up. He is like a beggar who receives alms from the palace, and feels put out because he was not asked inside to dine with the king.
St. John of Karpathos
Heck, Mickey, you don’t need St. John of Karpathos; go straight to the Good Book: The [seed sown] along the path are those who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, that they may not believe and be saved.
 
Oh, now it is a secondary response–back peddling again eh?

I did not think you would want the patristic intrepretation of the Psalm.

Afterall, you have your own interpretation. 👍
For heaven’s sake, Mickey, read Samuel; David was restored/forgiven at the recognition of his sin.
 
40.png
jmcrae:
But if you fall out of grace, then what? Can grace save you, if you are not in it?
Yes, that’s why grace is grace; those who are Christ’s will never perish.

To keep Contarini from another wrong inference, grace is not a license to sin.
40.png
jmcrae:
Sin causes us to fall out of grace; you have already posted the verse that shows us this. (Galatians 5:4)
The reason given for that falling is very specific: adding to faith in Christ the act of circumcision for salvation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top