W
Writer
Guest
Permit me just a few observations regarding this interesting topic. First a bit of background… We left the Episcopal tradition when Robinson (an active homosexual and activist) was ordained a Bishop. We are currently attending a Lutheran Chruch but seriously considering a move to Catholocism.
Be careful not to use too broad a brush when characterizing Protestants. Yes, there are some things they/we frequently do which we may find very annoying, but to question their very redemption is akin to judging and is not looked at too kindly in the Bible. I would suggest, for example, that the Baptist or Free Methodist and the Catholic are all Christains–saved by the blood of Christ. These believers, however, have a different understanding of what it means to be a Christian. The nature of faith is the same in most ways, but the details are different. By all means pray for your Protestant brothers and sisters (we all need that), but don’t assume that they aren’t Christians as much as yourselves. (A Catholic writer named David Armstrong writes along a similar vein.)
Remember also that denominations as a whole are sometimes ill-represented by specific churches. For example, the Free Methodist Church is a wonderful denomination, in my opinion. We happened to visit a local service, however, when the pastor was denouncing Catholics for the sins of the Episcopal Church. While we walked out quickly after the service, this doesn’t mean that the whole denomination is lacking in depth and understanding of the issues. This church happens to have some wonderful scholars in schools like Seattle Pacific University.
A comment on non-denominational churches… They frequently have little in the way of outside authority to answer to. The pastors can get away with saying incrediby foolish things. My wife attended a popular church in this category recently, for example, and the pastor indicated that he didn’t believe that Christ had descended into hell after the Crucifixion. Abandoning the Nicene Creed, Biblical authority, and tradition wouldn’t be looked at so kindly in more mainline denominations–I hope!
One last note… I read in another post on this topic that the Protestant songs were boring. This hits on a problem in the modern church. Many consider that church is to be entertaining first and foremost. (This is one of the reasons we have been without a church home for so long.) A good service, however, should be engaging, but not necessarily “entertaining”. Entertainment is what we find on television; church should be where we are convicted of our sin and receive hope in Christ.
I could go on and on (haven’t even discussed Communion yet!), but I must go. I hope my thoughts have not been too rambling or incoherent.
Be careful not to use too broad a brush when characterizing Protestants. Yes, there are some things they/we frequently do which we may find very annoying, but to question their very redemption is akin to judging and is not looked at too kindly in the Bible. I would suggest, for example, that the Baptist or Free Methodist and the Catholic are all Christains–saved by the blood of Christ. These believers, however, have a different understanding of what it means to be a Christian. The nature of faith is the same in most ways, but the details are different. By all means pray for your Protestant brothers and sisters (we all need that), but don’t assume that they aren’t Christians as much as yourselves. (A Catholic writer named David Armstrong writes along a similar vein.)
Remember also that denominations as a whole are sometimes ill-represented by specific churches. For example, the Free Methodist Church is a wonderful denomination, in my opinion. We happened to visit a local service, however, when the pastor was denouncing Catholics for the sins of the Episcopal Church. While we walked out quickly after the service, this doesn’t mean that the whole denomination is lacking in depth and understanding of the issues. This church happens to have some wonderful scholars in schools like Seattle Pacific University.
A comment on non-denominational churches… They frequently have little in the way of outside authority to answer to. The pastors can get away with saying incrediby foolish things. My wife attended a popular church in this category recently, for example, and the pastor indicated that he didn’t believe that Christ had descended into hell after the Crucifixion. Abandoning the Nicene Creed, Biblical authority, and tradition wouldn’t be looked at so kindly in more mainline denominations–I hope!
One last note… I read in another post on this topic that the Protestant songs were boring. This hits on a problem in the modern church. Many consider that church is to be entertaining first and foremost. (This is one of the reasons we have been without a church home for so long.) A good service, however, should be engaging, but not necessarily “entertaining”. Entertainment is what we find on television; church should be where we are convicted of our sin and receive hope in Christ.
I could go on and on (haven’t even discussed Communion yet!), but I must go. I hope my thoughts have not been too rambling or incoherent.