H
Hokomai
Guest
A very good point! I guess I should say âartifactâ and not âobjectâ.Well, I suppose Protestants do worship a material being that is believed to have been God- All Christians do- His name is Jesus!![]()
A very good point! I guess I should say âartifactâ and not âobjectâ.Well, I suppose Protestants do worship a material being that is believed to have been God- All Christians do- His name is Jesus!![]()
So are churches that believe in the Real Presence unique in worshiping a material object in the belief that it is (has become) God? **
Well, it isnât a matter of âbeliefâ, as Christ used the words you said, âThis isâŚâ. But that said, I think unique is a curious term here. Prior to folks like Zwingli, the entire Church, east and west, proclaimed the real presence. So, that belief would not be unique, but universal. ISTM the belief in a symbolic presence is the âuniqueâ viewpoint.
Jon
Thanks for this Cat - but I wonder if this was the way the worshipers of the statues actually thought. I realised on looking up Hezekiah that it was he would broke the bronze serpent of Moses because it too had become an object of idolatry - but there is no indication that the Jews who did this actually thought it was a god.Itâs an interesting question.
Iâve been searching the Bible for a clear-cut example of a âidolâ actually being a âgod,â and not just the âimage of the god.â
In Isaiah 37:19, King Hezekiah (my favorite person in the Bible other than the Lord Jesus!) is facing an attack by Assyria, and he prays, ââŚthe kings of Assyria have devastated all the countries and their lands, and have cast their gods into the fire, for they were not gods but the work of menâs hands, wood and stone. So they have destroyed them.â
(italics mine)
It seems to me that this passage speaks of the actual statues as the âgods,â not just images of the gods. King Hezekiah specifically say, âThey cast their gods into the fire,â implying that that was the end of their gods. If the statues had just been images of the god, then the worshippers could just carve another statue. But they didnât because their god was burned up. They would have to create another âgod.â
I meant unique among religions - animist, Hindu etc. Iâm very tempted to respond on the belief idea - but Iâll try to keep the thread focused! Thanks Jon.Well, it isnât a matter of âbeliefâ, as Christ used the words you said, âThis isâŚâ. But that said, I think unique is a curious term here. Prior to folks like Zwingli, the entire Church, east and west, proclaimed the real presence. So, that belief would not be unique, but universal. ISTM the belief in a symbolic presence is the âuniqueâ viewpoint.
Jon
So are churches that believe in the Real Presence unique in worshiping a material object in the belief that it is (has become) God? **
Did not God incarnate into man? Humanity is involved with time,space and matter. Jesus was also human.