D
Darryl_B
Guest
I don’t see contradiction at all. It is the presupposition about what the Kingdom of God constitutes that causes one to project current promises into future promises. The JW position is based on a feeling. This sure doesn’t feel like the Kingdom of God to me. I sure don’t feel Blessed in the Church. I sure don’t feel that Peace. That is all quite possibly their perception, but it is also the only argument to produce the eisegesis. It might work door to door, however it is just not my perception. The Kingdom has been around for 2000 years now. We have not experienced it’s completed fullness culmination, but that does not imply the Kingdom is not present. The NT says it is present tense over and over. The Church the Sacraments that simple. Not being part of that (and I was) does give one an eschatological focus rather than the peace and joy of the Kingdom.A non biased person would look at this and say…acording to darrel b
And truewitness…The bible contradicts itself. By saying people will be on earth forever
And also that they will be in heaven. By also saying the heavens and earth will burn up…and saying that the earth will be here forever.
The two of you are reading two separate things from the same book. Because the book is saying two separate things. Even if a catholic uses a church tradition…that wouldn’t change this apparent contradiction.
I know we don’t want there to be a contradiction…but if we are honest…it sure looks like it.
Do the JWs believe that “immortals” and long lived “mortals” will be living simultaneously on this earth for 1000 years? If so by their reasoning that is not the Kingdom.
A JW seems to have three ages. An age of emptiness now, wait here. An age of the partial Kingdom literal 1000 years, then a post age of the Kingdom complete, I only have two. An age of the partial Kingdom now, the end of time complete.