L
LostSheep7
Guest
He would have no clue in which Church door he should nail his theses.
I know. I was trying to be funny. I failed.Luther was a catholic monk and priest
Hubby and me joking around sometimes that if Luther reached heaven, there would be a crowd of annoyed catholic and orthodox saints awaiting him and say “dude, we will now talk about this piece of paper”
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)He would have no clue in which Church door he should nail his theses.
My German is pretty poor and I’m not much for standing in line, so I probably wouldn’t say anything. I do not think he would be terribly concerned about what the churches of Christendom thought of him. I would think his blood pressure would be very high, though, when it came to what he thought of the current state of Christendom and of Germany.what would you do? what would you say to him. furthermore. how would the church react to him?
Perhaps you, enough to at least make a comment…Who cares?
I´m scared he wouldn´t have seen more in it than just “being a bit over the top”I think it would be good for him to know how his opinions on Jews came to be used.
Yes that is the attitude I have disputed on here in regard to people like Columbus who are still revered by Catholic organisations despite their obvious unsuitability as inspirational leaders in all their works. It is one thing to recognise people’s good and bad aspects, still another to name your organisations after them. I think the Church is trying to do the good and bad thing - it should be applied in each case.I´m scared he wouldn´t have seen more in it than just “being a bit over the top”![]()
Totally agree. Sometimes, in favor of having leaders and idols, what is of course necessary for people in general, we ignore tooo much.I´m scared he wouldn´t have seen more in it than just “being a bit over the top”
Yes that is the attitude I have disputed on here in regard to people like Columbus who are still revered by Catholic organisations despite their obvious unsuitability as inspirational leaders in all their works. It is one thing to recognise people’s good and bad aspects, still another to name your organisations after them. I think the Church is trying to do the good and bad thing - it should be applied in each case.