P
ParkerD
Guest
Rinnie,[SIGN][/SIGN]
Parker Parker Parker, what is a person to do. Think what you are saying. In Corth 2:1-10 Thats all Paul talks about. That the wisdom and plan of God is revealed for the Pattern of Gods Secret hidden to others, but NOW IS REVEALED TO THE CHURCH.
Now Parker think Paul was a great scholar in Jewish faith, he admitted he didn’t see it either, Now his eyes are opened. Think Parker what happend when Paul was blind, God sent a Disciple to him to LAY HANDS ON PAUl, then his eyes were opened more ways then one. Lay of hands (like Holy Orders Parker) You can’t miss that.
But back to that scripture Pauls tells them point blank God reveals his plan to the Church. No more secrets Parker. Its all there. You have to admit that Church was the Catholic Church. Thats why it has all of the truth. The fullness of the truth. Please don’t tell me that you do not agree that Paul was part of the Catholic Church Parker. That is why all truth has to come from there. Paul just told you. If the CC does not accept it as truth its not the truth.
And if you believe the the scriptures are indeed the word of God then you must trust what Paul said. The Catholic Church has the truth revealed to it from God. The Holy Spirit is just another part of the Trinity in action Parker.
The bible tells you we do not have that Power of the Holy Spirit to define scripture. GO TO THE CHURCH it has the truth. If I am lying Parker why when it comes to sacraments etc the Catholic church is the same everywhere. It has to be Parker to be ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC. He can not be many. Only One. And there is only one teaching in the CC. No other church can say that. It is another point why it has to be the true Church.
Paul is talking to the members of the church in Corinth in 1 Corinthians 2. He never implies that the Holy Spirit is guaranteed to stay with leaders of the church if they dispute doctrines. He emphasizes that man’s wisdom is not sufficient.
Sorry, but I don’t agree that Paul was a part of the Catholic Church. It is clear to me that he was not. His writings are not like the catechisms at all. I do trust what Paul said. I love his writings, though I agree with Peter that some of them were “hard to understand” for some people.