If We Can Ban Terrorism Campaign, then Why Can't We Ban Porn?

[francisca]

I understand it’s about big money we’re talking about, they won’t just give up their $$$ easily, I suppose.

There will be people who are angry and insist porn be served to them.
“Why church coerce people, and so on”.

But this is not about the church against porn.

This is about obscenity to public exposure, is it not? And to prove it, just the same way we prove obscenity in public places in real life. Is there any difference that can separate these two? (the media as public exposure as compared to public places in real life)? Is this valid arguement? What’s the downside of this argument?

If there isn’t any, then

they’re being bigots for the sake of their $$$, these people selling our dignity as human being.

 

[francisca]

Would you know of any countries that have made porn illegal?

Singapore comes to mind but I am not sure.

Porn can’t be made illegal in Singapore, regardless what the Singapore law say: so long the site is still there, and google still allow it to be found. I do not know if there are porn produced in Singapore.

My hope is Google being regulated, I suppose?

Technical detail: I am not sure about this, but I think it should follow whatever not covered by freedom of speech, how do google/ authority remove them? Assuming this argument is successful: that people agree that porn is obscenity to public exposure.