If you are a Christian, what is the real reason for you not being a Catholic? - 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Surely the conclusion then is the proposition that he allowed Catholic Christians to use their free will to follow Luther and his brethren into the protestant communion?

Would this conclusion not be antithetical to the faith of any Catholic Christian?
Yes, I think that God allows apostasy. It is an orthodox conclusion that falling from grace is possible, and is under the control and free will of the individual.

It is antithetical to the faith of a Catholic to abandon the authority that Jesus appointed to guide the faithful.
I have, further, been assured that God - omnipotent, omniscient, eternal - knows all including the future. Would he have allowed this foreseeable destructive separation to take place - knowingly - as a sop to humankind’s individual and/or collective free will?

In Christ
God allows evil of all kinds, and is able to bring good out of it. He allowed the fall of Adam and Eve, and brought salvation in spite of it.

I think Reformation was badly needed, and the Council of Trent, along with a number of holy men and women living lives of sanctity in communion with the authority appointed by Christ did accomplish what was needed. Men are always in need of reform. 👍
 
Oh please. If you believe the sun is green because that is your faith, and if you beat up on those who do not agree with your interpretation of the colour of the sun, the world is going to hell in a handcart.

This goes round and round and round while Christians on both sides of the fence urge patience, understanding and ecumenism. I have recently been received into the Catholic Church, but would never, ever deny the choice of any Christian as to denomination. We are all Christians, in Christ.

In Christ
Hello Lisdogen,

Welcome to the Catholic Church. I hope that you also pray for your non-Catholic Christian brothers and sisters that they reject those things, which are anti-Catholic and those things, which are false.

The Catholic Church possesses the Full Deposit of Faith, wouldn’t you agree? I think that is the point that many here are attempting to explain.

Peace
 
Some believe that Christ founded the universal Christian church, of which the Catholic Church is part, along with many other denominations. The universal Church of Christ was not originally designated the ‘Catholic Church’, because that name did not exist for some decades.

If you think the claim is ‘ridiculous’ then perhaps it is up to you - for a change - to provide proof of your claim.

In Christ, for Christendom
The universal Christian Church is the Catholic Church. The word “catholic” means universal, and this is how it is described in the New Testament. “kath” + “holos” = throughout the whole.

I agree that this term did take some decades to emerge. Prior to that, it was called The Way.

All other movements have defined themselves by how they differ from Catholicism. That is why they are considered “denominations”. The denominate themselves from the orignial based on departures.
 
Some believe that Christ founded the universal Christian church, of which the Catholic Church is part, along with many other denominations.

Here are just a few protestant churches, and as you can clearly see the C.C. is the only apostolic church founded by Jesus. thousands of churches have branched off one each of these

Church Year Established Founder Where Established

Catholic 33 Jesus Christ Jerusalem

Orthodox 1054 Schismatic Catholic
Bishops Constantinople

Lutheran 1517 Martin Luther Germany

Anabaptist 1521 Nicholas Storch &
Thomas Munzer Germany

Anglican 1534 Henry VIII England

Mennonites 1536 Menno Simons Switzerland

Calvinist 1555 John Calvin Switzerland

Presbyterian 1560 John Knox Scotland

Congregational 1582 Robert Brown Holland

Baptist 1609 John Smyth Amsterdam

Dutch Reformed 1629 Michaelis Jones New York

Congregationalist1648 Pilgrims and Puritans Massachusetts

Quakers 1649 George Fox England

Amish 1693 Jacob Amman France

Freemasons 1717 Masons from four lodges London

Methodist 1739 John & Charles
Wesley England

Unitarian 1774 Theophilus Lindey London

Methodist Episcopal 1784 60 Preachers Baltimore, MD

Episcopalian 1789 Samuel Seabury American Colonies

United Brethren 1800 Philip Otterbein &
Martin Boehn Maryland

Disciples of Christ 1827 Thomas & Alexander
Campbell Kentucky

Mormon 1830 Joseph Smith New York

Methodist Protestant 1830 Methodist United States

Church of Christ 1836 Warren Stone &
Alexander Campbell Kentucky

Seventh Day Adventist 1844 Ellen White Washington, NH

Christadelphian (Brethren
of Christ 1844 John Thomas Richmond, VA

Salvation Army 1865 William Booth London

Holiness 1867 Methodist United States

Jehovah’s Witnesses 1874 Charles Taze Russell Pennsylvania

Christian Science 1879 Mary Baker Eddy Boston

Church of God in Christ 1895 Various churches of God Arkansas

Church of Nazarene c. 1850-1900 Various religious bodies Pilot Point, TX

Pentecstal 1901 Charles F. Parkham Topeka, KS

Aglipayan 1902 Gregorio Aglipay Philippines

Assemblies of God 1914 Pentecostalism Hot Springs, AZ

Iglesia ni Christo 1914 Felix Manalo Philippines

Four-square Gospel 1917 Aimee Semple
McPherson Los Angeles, CA

United Church of Christ 1961 Reformed and
Congregationalist Philadelphia, PA

Calvary Chapel 1965 Chuck Smith Costa Mesa, CA

United Methodist 1968 Methodist and United
Brethren Dallas, TX

Born-again c. 1970s Various religious bodies United States

Harvest Christian 1972 Greg Laurie Riverside, CA

Saddleback 1982 Rick Warren California

Non-denominational c. 1990s various United States

Top
 
Thanks for that list. I was going to ask for one. Surely there are several more than this. Aren’t e.g. Scientists one of them too? In fact, we call all of them except Roman Catholic, Orthodox and Lutheran; “CHRSTIAN SECTS”. You hardly meet any here in Europe. In Germany we have Roman Catholics an Lutherans, and hardly any others. Of course then other religions such as Jews and Moslems and sadly enough, atheists – heathens, which you even find among people who are christened.
 
Thanks for that list. I was going to ask for one. Surely there are several more than this. Aren’t e.g. Scientists one of them too? In fact, we call all of them except Roman Catholic, Orthodox and Lutheran; “CHRSTIAN SECTS”. You hardly meet any here in Europe. In Germany we have Roman Catholics an Lutherans, and hardly any others. Of course then other religions such as Jews and Moslems and sadly enough, atheists – heathens, which you even find among people who are christened.
Hello Bruno Schultz,

It is always sad when ever a properly baptized Christian reject’s their own faith…

It is also sad when Catholics reject their own Catholic faith by becoming protestant.

Fortunately though, many do come back to their Catholic faith… eventually.

Peace
 
**What doe those numbers mean in
I am a Roman Catholic.
314-15767DJ/7-305PT/1858-92879TM<
By the way: We still have the “rk” Roman Chatholic” in our passports.
Yeah; it’s a sad truth, that baptized Christians who do not believe, often are more contra Christianity than nonchristians. On the other hand; convertists who cam from Protestantism to Catholicism, or from atheist to us, are far more and intensively and strictly catholic, than Catholics. Even me, being Catholic who really believes in faith and the Roman Catholic Church for nearly 70 years now, does not as much as my converted friends do; one of them attending service in church every day in the Dome of Vienna. And they to it in flaming convincement, never because they’d “have to”. Others in the meantime went into closest relationship to convents etc. It often remains me on the personal history of St. Paul.

Well, when I speak to strangers e.g. in my clubs, people I never saw before, and through the murder on my son 1997 we very fast get to religious questions, I never try to convince them of Catholizism, but of Christianity. Most of them don’t know I’m Catholic. I’d build up a barrier between us, if I’d right away tried to convince of Catholicism, instead of opening a way to Christianity itself at first.
An US Jew (singer of my son who lived in our house for month) I tried to convince him of his Jewism first, even with the help of our friend the Rabbi – it was all in vein.
First of all, I try to get people interested in the convincement THERE IS GOD. The very last step is Catholicism (if the person is nothing - not so of course if the person is a nonbelieving Chatholic)
It’s about like making a young man a doctor, where we can’t start with the final exam, but the very first step; “what is a human body” 😃
**
 
Fortunately though, many do come back to their Catholic faith… eventually.
Very often though, they die and suddenly find themselves before God :mad:
A “oh, sorry - I didn’t believe Your’e real” won’t help then! It’ll be too late then. Eternally to late!
 
Lisdogan;3892358:
Some believe that Christ founded the universal Christian church, of which the Catholic Church is part, along with many other denominations.
The universal Church of Christ was not originally designated the ‘Catholic Church’, because that name did not exist for some decades.

If you think the claim is ‘ridiculous’ then perhaps it is up to you - for a change - to provide proof of your claim.

The burden of proof is on you since you are making the claim that Jesus established the C.C. as well as other denomination circa 33A.D.

Every single church, protestant,non-Catholic, non-denominational —what ever they go by nominally (outside the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church) can only trace its origin back to a mere-man, and that is a fact! --Not to Jesus; Not to the Apostles!

You name the church and I will provide you with its founder and when it was founded. The bible states unequivocally that Jesus Christ built one church, and it went by the name catholic as early as A.D. 110:

“Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist which is celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains . Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2”

Early Church historian J. N. D. Kelly, a Protestant, writes: “As regards ‘Catholic,’ its original meaning was ‘universal’ or ‘general.’ . . . in the latter half of the second century at latest, we find it conveying the suggestion that the Catholic is the true Church as distinct from heretical congregations (cf., e.g., Muratorian Canon). . . . What these early Fathers were envisaging was almost always the empirical, visible society; they had little or no inkling of the distinction which was later to become important between a visible and an invisible Church” (Early Christian Doctrines, 190–1).

The Lutheran church is the oldest protestant church. Lutheranism is a major branch of Western Christianity that identifies with the teachings of the sixteenth-century German reformer Martin Luther. Luther’s efforts to reform the theology and practice of the Roman Catholic Church launched the Protestant Reformation and, though it was not his original intention, left Western Christianity forever divided.

Jesus said his Church would be “the light of the world.” He then noted that “a city set on a hill cannot be hid” (Matt. 5:14). This means his Church is a visible organization. It must have characteristics that clearly identify it and that distinguish it from other churches. Jesus promised, “I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18). This means that his Church will never be destroyed and will never fall away from him. His Church will survive until his return.

Among the Christian churches, only the Catholic Church has existed since the time of Jesus. Every other Christian church is an offshoot of the Catholic Church. The Eastern Orthodox churches broke away from unity with the pope in 1054. The Protestant churches were established during the Reformation, which began in 1517. (Most of today’s Protestant churches are actually offshoots of the original Protestant offshoots.)

Only the Catholic Church existed in the tenth century, in the fifth century, and in the first century, faithfully teaching the doctrines given by Christ to the apostles, omitting nothing. The line of popes can be traced back, in unbroken succession, to Peter himself. This is unequaled by any institution in history.

Even the oldest government is new compared to the papacy, and the churches that send out door-to-door missionaries are young compared to the Catholic Church. Many of these churches began as recently as the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Some even began during your own lifetime. None of them can claim to be the Church Jesus established.

The Catholic Church has existed for nearly 2,000 years, despite constant opposition from the world. This is testimony to the Church’s divine origin. It must be more than a merely human organization, especially considering that its human members— even some of its leaders—have been unwise, corrupt, or prone to heresy.

Any merely human organization with such members would have collapsed early on. The Catholic Church is today the most vigorous church in the world (and the largest, with a billion members: one sixth of the human race), and that is testimony not to the cleverness of the Church’s leaders, but to the protection of the Holy Spirit.

Thank you Joe, you have just restated everything I have been trying to say so many times.
 
Hello Lisdogen,

Welcome to the Catholic Church. I hope that you also pray for your non-Catholic Christian brothers and sisters that they reject those things, which are anti-Catholic and those things, which are false.

The Catholic Church possesses the Full Deposit of Faith, wouldn’t you agree? I think that is the point that many here are attempting to explain.

Peace
AMEN!
 
And some on here think I’m to strong in what I say. . I don’t think I have ever “railed” against any one. I may not agree how they state things and I do try to clarify what the Church teaches, but I have never said anything against others sincerity. Why do you think I have something against protestants as fellow pilgrims on the journey towards eternity? I think is an unkind assumption on your part. As I said before, I married two of them. I would like nothing better than to share the Catholic Faith with everyone, Catholics and non-catholics alike. I am a bit shocked that some Catholics on the forum don’t feel the same way. Maybe if we Catholics were all on the same wave length, ( the teachings of the Catholic Church), we could help others understand the faith and overcome some of the false ideas they have.

This idea that we are all Christians who believe the same basic things is really a false statement. While we do share some of the same beliefs of sorts, there are some very serious differences that separate us from them, and it doesn’t help a bit to gloss over these difference as tho they don’t exist. A few of the MOST important ones are Apostolic Succession, the Mass and Holy Eucharist and Confession. And there are soo many other differences. The Holy Father has said many times we must evangelize without compromising our Catholic Faith. Are we to be content to let them drink from a puddle when we have the Stream of Living Water to share? Please, get off you high horse and start, studying your Catholic Faith in its TRUTH. and then share it with EVERYONE.
There is a deal of bias, strong belief in one set of ‘absolute truths’, and certain statements that are unnecessarily provocative: ‘This idea that we are all Christians who believe the same basic things is really a false statement’ for example. It entirely omits Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, Son of God and Man, Redeemer.

I am glad you are strong in your faith. But remember that others are too: other Catholics, other Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Daoists and Moslems.

You suggest we (other Catholics) ‘get off our high horse and start, studying our Catholic Faith in its TRUTH. and then share it with EVERYONE.’ OK, you take the Hindus first, and get a friend with likeminded trust in certain ‘absolute truths’ which you have discerned, to tackle the Daoists, assuming that you know something about their faiths.

I absolutely agree, as a Protestant Catholic of liberal views (!), that it is preferable to have faith that other’s faith is acceptable to God, and to accommodate yourself that belief.

In Christ
 
Thats funny, I thought HE talked to them quite frequently. Your right, Lucifer was the first to rebel, but Adam and Eve were the first human beings to sin. That makes it original for us.
Can I assume that you believe that every word in the Bible, OT and NT are literally correct and without error, immutable and in every facet perfect?

In Christ
 
Lisdogan;3892358:
Some believe that Christ founded the universal Christian church, of which the Catholic Church is part, along with many other denominations.
The universal Church of Christ was not originally designated the ‘Catholic Church’, because that name did not exist for some decades.

If you think the claim is ‘ridiculous’ then perhaps it is up to you - for a change - to provide proof of your claim.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the claim that Jesus established the C.C. as well as other denomination circa 33A.D.
I did not say that, and you can read my statement again.
Every single church, protestant,non-Catholic, non-denominational —what ever they go by nominally (outside the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church) can only trace its origin back to a mere-man, and that is a fact! --Not to Jesus; Not to the Apostles!
Every Church whose members come to God through Christ, and believe in Him was founded by Jesus. He is the rock, the firm foundation on which they stand. They may stand in different positions, they may stand looking in different directions, but they are all His.
You name the church and I will provide you with its founder and when it was founded. The bible states unequivocally that Jesus Christ built one church, and it went by the name catholic as early as A.D. 110:
I have seen this argument before, and it is not interesting actually. I know you can name the men/women. And there are still Christian Churches being founded every day - in Africa principally by charismatics from Ghana and Nigeria who are spreading their faith across the continent.

My reading, as opposed to your reading, says that Christ established His Church, and that men starting with Peter have organised it, set out its theology and liturgy, and kept it running. Perhaps that Church is the core or trunk of the universal church of Christ. Other men, arguably just as inspired by God through Christ, challenged the ‘truth’ and manifestations of that ‘truth’, and moved towards what they considered a faith more reflective of Christ’s nature, mission and message. We might call these the branches of the tree.

When one wears a shirt with pink, purple and blue spots, the shirt is still a shirt.
Early Church historian J. N. D. Kelly, a Protestant, writes: "As regards ‘Catholic,’ its original meaning was ‘universal’ or ‘general.’ . . . in the latter half of the second century at latest, **we find it **conveying the suggestion ****
that the Catholic is the true Church as distinct from heretical congregations (cf., e.g., Muratorian Canon). . . . What these early Fathers were envisaging was almost always the empirical, visible society; they had little or no inkling of the distinction which was later to become important between a visible and an invisible Church" (Early Christian Doctrines, 190–1).

Thank you for this reference: I shall follow it up. I have not heard of Kelly.
The Lutheran church is the oldest protestant church. Lutheranism is a major branch of Western Christianity that identifies with the teachings of the sixteenth-century German reformer Martin Luther.
Luther’s efforts to reform the theology and practice of the Roman Catholic Church launched the Protestant Reformation and, though it was not his original intention, left Western Christianity forever divided.

This sounds like a quote from a history book, and I think that most of us are aware of the stories about Luther and the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation. I am not sure that it is accurate to say that the Lutheran Church is the ‘oldest’ protestant church, as there were others who protested against the church long before Luther set up his major disagreement.

Some argue that the Church of England existed very soon after the crucifixion, through Paul, and that it only came into contact with Rome in the 6th century (Augustine). Some of them were quashed as heretical, others still survive although in very fragile forms.
Jesus said his Church would be “the light of the world.” He then noted that “a city set on a hill cannot be hid” (Matt. 5:14). This means his Church is a visible organization. It must have characteristics that clearly identify it and that distinguish it from other churches. Jesus promised, “I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18). This means that his Church will never be destroyed and will never fall away from him. His Church will survive until his return.

Among the Christian churches, only the Catholic Church has existed since the time of Jesus. Every other Christian church is an offshoot of the Catholic Church. The Eastern Orthodox churches broke away from unity with the pope in 1054. The Protestant churches were established during the Reformation, which began in 1517. (Most of today’s Protestant churches are actually offshoots of the original Protestant offshoots.)

Only the Catholic Church existed in the tenth century, in the fifth century, and in the first century, faithfully teaching the doctrines given by Christ to the apostles, omitting nothing. The line of popes can be traced back, in unbroken succession, to Peter himself. This is unequaled by any institution in history.

Even the oldest government is new compared to the papacy, and the churches that send out door-to-door missionaries are young compared to the Catholic Church. Many of these churches began as recently as the nineteenth or twentieth centuries. Some even began during your own lifetime. None of them can claim to be the Church Jesus established.

The Catholic Church has existed for nearly 2,000 years, despite constant opposition from the world. This is testimony to the Church’s divine origin. It must be more than a merely human organization, especially considering that its human members— even some of its leaders—have been unwise, corrupt, or prone to heresy.

Any merely human organization with such members would have collapsed early on. The Catholic Church is today the most vigorous church in the world (and the largest, with a billion members: one sixth of the human race), and that is testimony not to the cleverness of the Church’s leaders, but to the protection of the Holy Spirit.
 
I’m an ex-catholic… I was born and raised Catholic and what turned me from the church was the realisation that the bible was God’s word and anything outside of that was purely from men. Now before you all yell out “Sola scriptura is wrong!” in unison, or “you weren’t really a Catholic!” I just want to say that I believe that the early church fathers ran a very different church to that run today… I wanted to get back to a church that did it like Jesus did it. I realised that the church had become so different to the early church that it just didn’t look like it anymore!

I found a church where people get healed, people speak in tongues and people really worship Christ. I repented of my sin and asked God to forgive me, and my walk with God is now amazing.

I’m not against being Catholic per se, I just want people to realise that being born again of the spirit and baptised in the spirit is a real experience with Jesus. And where I was I know that Jesus would have said to me “Depart from me you worker of iniquity, I never knew you.”

And it’s true, I never knew Christ personally. I do now and I praise God for His word, it really does lead people to Him.
 
Lisdogan reply to joe370 @ # 1168
Sorry, it is almost impossible to reply to this posting because my initial posting has not been put in correct quotes, and is undifferentiated from comments and observations made by Joe370:. my reply is in red quotes, sort of. Not very satisfactory I’m afraid. To be brief therefore
Lisdogan: Some believe that Christ founded the universal Christian church, of which the Catholic Church is part, along with many other denominations
 
**
Can I assume that you believe that every word in the Bible, OT and NT are literally correct and without error, immutable and in every facet perfect?

In Christ
Yes! Absolutely every word in the Holy Bible is literally correct and without error, immutable and in every facet perfect?

But:

One must WANT to understand not just by brain, but by heart too.

Understanding is not simply translate word by word in it’s actual meaning human beings agreed to, that this sound means that. As we do have language for say 15,ooo years, language is more than one to one translation; as if you give orders to your dog. In our high and very meticulous language, same word might mean a lot of diverse things; to be understood only then, when we WANT to understand.
If we speak to dump people, we do have to explain all the time, whilst when we speak to educated, conversation is fluent and both know exactly what’s meant.
If I’d tell you, that at the moment it rains cats and dogs over here in Karlsruhe, which is absolutely true right now, you wouldn’t waste a second on thoughts about the poor animals falling off heaven - would you?!
**
 
**In my posting above, we have an exampel:
Heaven and sky or skies in German is one word, called “Himmel”.
So, you wouldn’t say cats and dogs fall from heaven, but …fall from the skies.
In the Holy Bible, the original language was Hebrew, Aramic (wrong spelling - the language of Jesus) and Greek. The way of thinking in the first century was very much different from todays. Adding the fact, that language even changes a bit from generation to generation. So, exegets have to find matching words that cover and express thinking of these days and hit or meet our understanding on the point.
As even two people sometimes apprehend different things they red on the same note or speech and attorneys are masters in twisting every word into it’s contrary, we must be open hearted WANTING to understand. We will, when it’s given to us to understand. Otherwise see psalm 115:6: they have ears, but cannot hear, or Isaiah 6:9: He said, "Go and tell this people: ‘Be ever hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but never perceiving.’
**
 
I’m an ex-catholic… I was born and raised Catholic and what turned me from the church was the realisation that the bible was God’s word and anything outside of that was purely from men. Now before you all yell out “Sola scriptura is wrong!” in unison, or “you weren’t really a Catholic!” I just want to say that I believe that the early church fathers ran a very different church to that run today… I wanted to get back to a church that did it like Jesus did it. I realised that the church had become so different to the early church that it just didn’t look like it anymore!

I found a church where people get healed, people speak in tongues and people really worship Christ. I repented of my sin and asked God to forgive me, and my walk with God is now amazing.

I’m not against being Catholic per se, I just want people to realise that being born again of the spirit and baptised in the spirit is a real experience with Jesus. And where I was I know that Jesus would have said to me “Depart from me you worker of iniquity, I never knew you.”

And it’s true, I never knew Christ personally. I do now and I praise God for His word, it really does lead people to Him.
Sorry you felt you had to leave the Catholic Church to “find” Jesus. when you walked away from HIM in the Holy Eucharist. Why couldn’t you “find” Him in the Catholic Faith?? Maybe your heart wasn’t open to Him, especially in the Blessed Sacrament, where you can spend time with Him whenever you want. The Sacred Heart devotion is a beautiful way to return your love for HIM. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, if you participate in the “state of Grace” you can receive HIM, BODY,BLOOD,SOUL and DIVINITY, every day if you want. You walked away from so much more than any other denomination can offer you.
The Faith of the Early Church Fathers is the very same Faith the Catholic Church has today, and a sincere study into that would prove to you it is. The Catholic Church has always taught that Sacred Scripture IS the WORD of GOD and every Mass has lots of Scripture in it. Somewhere you missed the point, There is NO higher form of worship than the Mass. And we also have the Sacrament of Confession, (Penance). You left more than you’ll ever find anywhere else.
 
I know you believe that, and for a long time I believed that too. There is no Jesus in the Eucharist (won’t that start some people going off) when you repent Jesus comes INSIDE of you, His spirit and your spirit combine. His righteousness, for your unrighteousness. I used to feel that holy, peaceful feeling in the mass also… but now I don’t feel anything in the church like I used to. It’s an odd feeling but it feels cold to me now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top