B
BobP123
Guest
Defiance of/against the Pope is another thread, bb.In other words, “Backwards, march!”
But no matter how “conservative” the reversions and restorations would be, they wouldn’t be enough for some people.
Defiance of/against the Pope is another thread, bb.In other words, “Backwards, march!”
But no matter how “conservative” the reversions and restorations would be, they wouldn’t be enough for some people.
At least the trans fats. That should make the progressives happy.I’d classify gluttony as a grave sin / mortal sin.
Well I just think that it should be emphasized as much as lust is. Why is anything at all to do with lust a MORTAL sin, but you can stuff yourself till you’re double your healthy weight and no one seems to care.Gluttony is already classified as a capital sin. So would you classify all of the seven capital sins into mortal sins?
CCC 1866 There are seven capital sins: Pride, avarice, envy, wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth.
Since gluttony is already ranked as a capial sin, isn’t it up to each of us to examine our consciences in that regard. Because we live in a part of the Western World where sex saturates the media (and therefore to some extent, our daily lives), we need to be sure that our consciences are up to the task of self-examination. Since the Church has ranked the seven as capital sins - and we know that - why blame the Church for our failing?Well I just think that it should be emphasized as much as lust is. Why is anything at all to do with lust a MORTAL sin, but you can stuff yourself till you’re double your healthy weight and no one seems to care.
It’s about addressing things that are becoming new problems… with gluttony as a capital sin the church has an opportunity to help with the obesity crisis. And certainly the obesity problem is a sign that we aren’t as spiritual as we should… I know for me food is an idol at times, and I just wish the church would make it clear that it should be more of a priority.
Actually, we’ve been going backwards for several decades now, what everyone is talking about is FORWARD movement.In other words, “Backwards, march!”
.
I don’t really know what a capital sin is. Do you have to confess them? Aren’t they the cause of sin rather than actual sins themselves?Since gluttony is already ranked as a capial sin, isn’t it up to each of us to examine our consciences in that regard. Because we live in a part of the Western World where sex saturates the media (and therefore to some extent, our daily lives), we need to be sure that our consciences are up to the task of self-examination. Since the Church has ranked the seven as capital sins - and we know that - why blame the Church for our failing?
Amen.None. I would take the name Celestine VI and then resign and go back to my cave…
I think those who simply want to excommunicate tons of individuals should review some history–severity is sometimes a good policy and sometimes not. There’s always been saintly people who wanted just that and there’s always been other saintly people who wanted otherwise. Check out these pairs: St. Victor I and St. Ireneaus; St. Hypollitus and St. Callistus I; St. Stephen I and St. Sixtus II; St. Basil and St. Damasus I; St. Peter Damian and St. Leo IX; etc. They represent the times when the choice for severity was not made (even though one of the parties in each pair desired severity). It’s good to look at instances where severity was not chosen, and then compare it instances when severity was chosen and see why the different approaches were taken in the different circumstances. Then, compare it to the instances in more recent times when severity has not been chosen and times when it has been.
I think then you might see the Pope, by not doing what you all would do, might be acting with more wisdom and knowledge than we have.
Yes, all are sins and can be either mortal or venial and should be confessed. Glad you’ve decided not to run for Pope since the name “Pope Noah” might take a big adjustment since Noah was married and all. (Re the capital sins, check the Catechism.)I don’t really know what a capital sin is. Do you have to confess them? Aren’t they the cause of sin rather than actual sins themselves?
Why blame the church… goodness, I was just offering a suggestion. It’s not a failure, its an opportunity to increase the relevance of church teachings to the problems of society, that’s all. That’s the contribution I’d make as pope. I’m not running for pope though, so don’t worry![]()
None. I would take the name Celestine VI and then resign and go back to my cave…
I think those who simply want to excommunicate tons of individuals should review some history–severity is sometimes a good policy and sometimes not. There’s always been saintly people who wanted just that and there’s always been other saintly people who wanted otherwise. Check out these pairs: St. Victor I and St. Ireneaus; St. Hypollitus and St. Callistus I; St. Stephen I and St. Sixtus II; St. Basil and St. Damasus I; St. Peter Damian and St. Leo IX; etc. They represent the times when the choice for severity was not made (even though one of the parties in each pair desired severity). It’s good to look at instances where severity was not chosen, and then compare it instances when severity was chosen and see why the different approaches were taken in the different circumstances. Then, compare it to the instances in more recent times when severity has not been chosen and times when it has been.
I think then you might see the Pope, by not doing what you all would do, might be acting with more wisdom and knowledge than we have./QUOTE]
As far as our current Pope–it will remain to be seen what will eventually happen during his papacy. But he inherited a messy bed that he has to lie in —the state of the Church which includes attacks on our doctrine , the Mass, some Eastern Catholics giving the papacy only primacy of honor- what is happening below, etc. —and hopefully straighten out.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=196300
That’s pretty close to what I might do. Probably, I’d issue a mandate saying, “Return with me to December 1st, 1965. Everything is now exactly as it was then. Now: we’re going to start this over again, and this time, we’re going to do it right.” And we’d begin with Vatican II, before the dissent, before the Novus Ordo, before the mistakes. And we’d institute Vatican II as it was supposed to instituted, minus the excesses of the Sickening Sixties, Silly Seventies, and Egotistical Eighties.Restore the TLM leaving '65 ordo missae + expanded lectionary as the ‘extraordinary form,’ depose numerous bishops, beatify Lefebvre by acclamation and order an exorcism for every parish.
You mean “Obsolete Countercultural Pablum”. That’s what “OCP” really stands for.Also ban any music books that come from the Oregon “Catholic” Press.
But if you were to excommunicate all those people, wouldn’t that be saying the Church isn’t fine just as she is? - right now, all those people are in good standing, so you would be messing with her perfection if you booted them.What would I change?
Nothing.
The Bride of Christ is perfect and beautiful just as She is.
I would, however, excommunicate every single last clergy, layman, and religious who can’t understand that and feel they have the right to re-make the Church in their own image.
Then we would set about the task of making up for lost time.
~Liza
Before anything I’d make sure that I have a good chapel and a good doctor because I’d be sure to get one big headache……what changes would you make to the Catholic Church? grabs popcorn and sits back…