Iâve thought of this before, tooâŚand Iâm not sureâŚit would be difficult to imagine such a world.
HmmmâŚwithout Christianity, I would still believe in a few basic things that simple logic would lead me to conclude, and if I was to choose an existing religion, it would have to meet these criteria:
- There is a Creator, Who must be powerful enough to have created the entire Universe and therefore, logically, must be outside of the physical Universe and capable of bending its rules, since He by definition would have been the one to make them. Any theory where there is no Creator always seems to lead to the problem of infinite regress within a system (the physical universe) where we can see with our own eyes that nothing happens without a cause. This is an oxymoron, and thus I could not find belief in an uncreated Universe to be tenable. So in short I would believe in an omnipotent, non-physical, transcendent Creator.
- There is something immortal and non-physical about the human being, and probably all lifeforms (although since I only know what it is to be human, humanity would be the only lifeform about which I could be totally certain), and this immortal part of us must be non-physical. If we were strictly physical beings, I see no reason to believe that we would be truly âaliveâ inside, as opposed to being more like a supercomputer made of meat, a bundle of blind, lifeless âcircuitryâ that happens to be made of flesh instead of metals and such. But we are alive, so we must be more than that. And if we are not therefore a âcollection of partsâ we must be indivisible, thus immortal (death cannot occur without disollution). So I would, in essence, believe in the immortal soul.
- There is such a thing as Objective Good, and thus such a thing as Evil. Basic beliefs about good and evil are so hardwired into us that, if #1 is true, I would have to believe that this hardwired tendency to believe in good and evil must come from the Creator. Now, keep in mind that if EITHER #1 or #2 were false, I could not believe in #3. Without a Creator, our sense of good and evil might just be biology designed to keep the species physically alive, which would hardly be a source of objective morality rather than accident of evolution; yet without a soul, there would be no real life, only advanced computers made of flesh, and computers cannot be capable of good or evil, not to mention that the whole question would be moot since there would be no real lifeforms to care. But because I would still believe in both 2 and 3, it would make more sense than not if the Creator intended for those moral codes to be there. I.e. I would believe in some sort of Natural Law of Good and Evil.
- The Creator cares about His Creation, perhaps especially humanity. Due to #3, I would be disinclined to believe that Deism was true. To painstakingly include a moral code in Oneâs Created Lifeforms is a step that I donât think one would take if One did not care how the Lifeforms fare. Becaue humanity is unique in having a moral code, I would have to believe that humanityâand any other being with an intellect if, in this hypothetical universe, such a being were discoveredâranked a bit higher in the Creatorâs scale than other creatures which had not been given the gift of morality.
- The Creator desires a relationship of some form with Humanity, both in this life and the next. As with #3, the search for Ultimate Truth is far too common to humanity to be written off. If there were no Creator, it could just be a by-product, a âglitchâ of the evolution of human intelligence. But since there must be a Creator, it makes sense to believe that this desire for Ultimate Truth is a deliberate inclusion in the human psyche. Moreover, the vast majority of humans seem to have a desire not only to âknowâ the Truth intellectually, but to be united with that Truth as a Higher Power. I would be convinced that this is a sign that the Creator does intend to have some sort of relationship with humanity, and since humans have immortal souls as per #3, this would not end with death. I wouldnât know the exact nature of this relationship, but the evidence would lead me to believe that it was one in humanityâs best interests, for it could be the very purpose of our creation.
- The odds are high that some existing religion out there is true, or at least several highly similar ones are each mostly true except for in the small differences. Because of #5, I would probably suppose that the Creator would give some sort of set revelation of how to have a relationship with Him. While this is not necessarily true (and this belief would be much less set-in-stone for me than the others), it is highly irregular to expect to have a relationship with someone who is absolutely clueless as to what your tastes, preferences, etc. are. Do you marry someone without sharing with them your expectations? Do you hire an employee without making the requirements known? While I would be willing to believe that the Creator might not show Himself to everyone in a blinding supernatural wayâbecause I can see how having faith is a virtue of loveâthere would still have to be something or other in which to have faith in the first place. A vague notion of âjust do the right thing and believe that thereâs some sort of Creatorâ could be what youâre having faith in, but #5 would lead me to believe the Creator would be a little more personal than that.
- ??? is the True Religion. Iâm not sure what that religion would be if it werenât Christianity, which is symbolically fitting (and accidental, by the way): This would be number 7 on the list, which is Biblically the number of fulness and perfection. So the fulfillment and perfection of my beliefs would be whatever the True Religion was. Yet without Christianity, I wouldnât know exactly where to find that final piece of the puzzle. But the point of including this point is that I would not consider my beliefs fully complete until I had found it.
Now with that list noted, letâs consider what my options would be.
In a world without Christianity, Iâm not sure that I would believe in Judaism even if it still existed. It is the Resurrection of Jesus, to me personally, that proves Judaism to be valid, because Judaism was the religion that Jesus affirmed. So without Christianity, I wouldnât believe in Judaism eitherânot because they believe anything about God that would contradict what I would believe of Him (many Jews believe everything I listed above, after all), but I would not probably find sufficient evidence to make me believe that He had specially chosen one race out of all the world, that Judaismâs 613 Laws were necessarily relevant to what God would desire for humanity, etc. Again, let me repeat that I am not saying there would be anything wrong with Judaism, itâs just that without the Resurrection of a God-Man Who had said Judaism was true, I wouldnât have seen any reason to believe that Judaism was true out of all the religions in the world. Ironically, the very thing that proves Judaism to be true in my eyes is the very thing that compels me to believe in Christianity
rather than Old Testament Judaism.
Of course, thereâs the possibility that I would believe in whatever religion that I had been born into (therefore including Judaism, if Iâd been born into it), as long as it didnât contradict the criteria above. Otherwise, one of the monotheistic faiths, with prescribed ethics and rituals (due to #'s 5 and 6), would probably be the most likely candidate. Itâs difficult to say which one that would be, though, because I cannot think of any religion besides Christianity that is not only based in so radical and special a miracle as the Resurrection, but around which the known facts and history surrounding it seem to indicate that something highly irregular and unprecedented really did happen, and for which all the ânaturalâ explanations fall too short to make sense to me. So if I didnât end up believing whatever I was raised to believe or just settling on whatever religion that appealed to me, had good ethics, and didnât contradict the above convictions, Iâd probably be a bit of a drifter, hoping to find the True Religion, believing it was somewhere out there, but fearing I might never find it until the next life.

Thank God that, in reality, He chose to speak loud and clear by giving us the Resurrection of Christ! It might still require faith, but given the unparalleled historical support for the existence of Jesus, and what is in my opinion a total lack of any other convincing (when all is examined closely) explanation for the Resurrection claims, the choice seems a lot clearer to me in a world
with Christianity than in a world
without it! I am happy to say that in reality the Resurrection of Jesus Christ gives me my #7, the missing puzzle piece. :extrahappy:
I donât mean to start a debate with any of the above, by the way, as that would be off topic. I feel the need to say that, because Iâve seen a fair number of curiosity-based threads like this get derailed by debate when something someone says is taken as a challenge by someone who disagrees. I just wanted to share the specifics of what I would believe in such a world, since for me it wouldnât be a simple one-step or clear-cut thought process at all.
Blessings in Christ,
KindredSoul