Ignorance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UnityofTrinity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sir you’ve admitted that you’re fallible, and therefore, everything you believe could be wrong.
no actually it says INFALLBILE…because the statements I have made regarding the Church have been infallible statements, so by YOUR DEFINITON, i would be infallible on that matter, read again
 
second tiring example, if HItler says 2+2=4 is he wrong…no

a person can’t be infallible but a statement can

and the statements I am saying that regard the CHurch, are indeed infallible
You’re fallible, and could be wrong about everything you believe regarding the Church.
 
Nope, sorry, for this specific thread, I am going to say for the sake of argument that I am infallible, sorry this argument didn’t turn out the way you wanted
 
no actually it says INFALLBILE…because the statements I have made regarding the Church have been infallible statements, so by YOUR DEFINITON, i would be infallible on that matter, read again
But sir, you’re fallible, so all of what you said regarding infallible statements is fallible.

Being fallible you really have no way of knowing whether what you claim is infallible really is infallible.

That’s not to say you can’t, or don’t believe them completely, but you could be wrong about them.
 
maybe you should be agnostic, because according to your fallible reasoning, there is no way you can know for sure that CHrist is your saviour, since you are fallible
The same is true of your fallible belief that Christ is your savior.
 
But sir, you’re fallible, so all of what you said regarding infallible statements is fallible.

Being fallible you really have no way of knowing whether what you claim is infallible really is infallible.

That’s not to say you can’t, or don’t believe them completely, but you could be wrong about them.
you are constructing a strawman, as i have never claimed to be fallible
 
Nope, sorry, for this specific thread, I am going to say for the sake of argument that I am infallible, sorry this argument didn’t turn out the way you wanted
You’ve already admitted to your fallibility, and I concur, everyone is fallible.
 
Sir, you have denied that you are infallible. Therefore, it is logical for me to conclude that you are fallible.
once again, you need to reread, for the sake of this post, i am taking the position that I am infallbile, so good luck with that
 
**let’s review
  1. You claim everyone is fallible
  2. You are part of everyone, thereofre you are fallible
  3. I said i am infallible
  4. You fallibly say i am fallible
  5. Therefore i can be said to be infallbile and you are fallible
you lose, game over, troll**
 
**let’s review
  1. You claim everyone is fallible
  2. You are part of everyone, thereofre you are fallible
  3. I said i am infallible
  4. You fallibly say i am fallible
  5. Therefore i can be said to be infallbile and you are fallible
you lose, game over, troll**
Please prove that you are infallible…
 
Please prove that you are infallible…
my perfect proof would be fallibly interpreted by a fallible person such as yourself, therefore I can’t prove it, not because of any lacking on my part, but because of your inability to comprehend

as proved in scriptures “there is nothing which human malice cannot abuse since it abuses even God’s goodness”

therefore no matter how perfectly I prove something, your malice and error will be capable of twisting it
 
I take it then that you are unable to produce the #s of the posts in which I said what you assert I said, is that right?

If you can’t produce them, just say you can’t, and we can move on.
I find this amusing. You can stay here and argue with yourself in circular logic. I am moving on now. I dust my feet off on you and say, “peace be with you.”
 
Jesus called people far worse, and no one is more charitable then him, but of course someone as fallible as yourself can even twist God’s goodness
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top