Illegal Immigration and the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter drthomas_21
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t think Our Lord would consider you an idiot for giving your all:
If you take every word of the Holy Bible literally, it would seem that we should all take your advice and give all that we have down to the last “widow’s mite”. Then we can go off and perish when the welfare lines get too long to include us with the assurance that we shall see God.

However, the Bible was not meant to be taken literally unless you are a fundamentalist Protestant. Matthew 5:29-30 advises you to pluck out your right eye and also cut off your right hand throw them away if they cause you to sin. Are you willing to follow such advice? The Catholic viewpoint is that the Bible is indeed true, that everything contained within it has moral and spiritual truths to convey. The Bible does this through such literary devices as metaphor and allegory. Jesus used these extensively to teach.

I believe the Lord would think I was misguided to literally give all.
 
If you take every word of the Holy Bible literally, it would seem that we should all take your advice and give all that we have down to the last “widow’s mite”.

I believe the Lord would think I was misguided to literally give all.
I never gave you any advice. I simply said “I don’t think Our Lord would consider you an idiot for giving your all” and quoted the Scripture.

The Lord didn’t say the widow was ‘misguided’ for giving her all.
Amen I say to you, this poor widow hath cast in more than all they who have cast into the treasury. 44 For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want cast in all she had, even her whole living.
 
I never gave you any advice. I simply said “I don’t think Our Lord would consider you an idiot for giving your all” and quoted the Scripture.

The Lord didn’t say the widow was ‘misguided’ for giving her all.
The point is that whether we are talking about an individual, an agency or a nation, there is a limit on how much aid can be given. It would be irresponsible on any of those levels to give away everything. The original point was that illegal aliens place hardship on our society in many ways which have already been covered extensively in this thread.
 
The point is that whether we are talking about an individual, an agency or a nation, there is a limit on how much aid can be given. It would be irresponsible on any of those levels to give away everything. The original point was that illegal aliens place hardship on our society in many ways which have already been covered extensively in this thread.
I agree totally with you here. I have never questioned that illegal aliens place a hardship on us and take away from helping others. As I said before, I am against anyone entering illegally. It is a burden we should not have to shoulder.

My only point of departure from most here is that I believe that given the situation, wrong though it is, the Church has a mission to assist with those in grave need. We also should not have to visit prisons, yet we acknowledge our duty to reach out to those criminals who have commited more serious crimes.
 
I agree totally with you here. I have never questioned that illegal aliens place a hardship on us and take away from helping others. As I said before, I am against anyone entering illegally. It is a burden we should not have to shoulder.

My only point of departure from most here is that I believe that given the situation, wrong though it is, the Church has a mission to assist with those in grave need. We also should not have to visit prisons, yet we acknowledge our duty to reach out to those criminals who have committed more serious crimes.
Our prisons are full of illegals who committed serious crimes in this country. I guess you could say that this is another way we feel the impact of their presence. There are only a few ways to assist them that are legitimate. You can by being a spiritual advisor and also by praying for them.

As far as illegals seeking aid from the Church. Who determines what falls under the category of “grave need”. If they came here because someone gave them a job then they shouldn’t really need food and clothing. These are the hard working ambitious migrants we are referring to. If their needs aren’t being met by their employer then I guess it may not be so desirable to come to this country for profit. The employer must be assuming that local agencies will take up the slack. They can’t get away with that if they hire you or me. If the Church and other agencies help them, then the problem doesn’t get solved.
 
Call me the devil’s advocate 😃
We can only hope to live up to our Saviour’s message to feed the hungry and clothe the poor.
Amen!
Americn’s are anything but stngy in this regard privately giving more than three times as much as our nearest friendly conributor to foreign needs, the French.
We have more to give.
As recently as 2006 data shows the US government gave $20 billion in USAID, while private American contributions totalled over $26 billion. This is above and beyond what we pay in taxes for welfare, education, and medical treatment for illegal aliens.
Forgetting, of course, the billions of tax dollars that are generated by illegal immigrants.
In my home area of Southern Arizona this lawlessness is a key contributor to our loss of two of three class one trauma centers,
  • Allow everyone to obtain identification cards and hospitals would always know who is being treated and whom to bill.
  • Allow everyone to purchase health insurance and nonpayment wouldn’t be as much of an issue.
Problem solved. 🙂
overcrowding of K-12 schools,
Schools are paid for every child with a seat in the seat. If the schools are overcrowded due to illegal immigrants, then there are a lot of teachers, administrators, aides, and classified employees that owe their jobs to illegal immigrants. Without them there would be fewer students to educate and fewer jobs to go around.
higher crime due to human and drug trafficking, piles of trash along the border, ransacked ranches and terrorized American ranchers.
I don’t live along the border so I will take your word for it. Where I live, the cops have their hands full with crummy American kids whose parents care more about pursuing their own selfish interests instead of actually raising their children. 🤷 I’ll take an illegal family with values over an American family without values any day of the week…but I’m odd like that. The accident of birth is not high on my list of priorities. I prefer to judge people for who they are.

One particular corner in the neighboring town has a bad rap because it is where day laborers congregate. After many complaints, the cops decided to bust everyone on the corner and wouldn’t you know it, the majority of them were American citizens. :rolleyes:
Two Catholic charities are advancing subversive tactics to abrogate American law by informing illegals of Federal law regarding Emergency Room care and welfare payments. Catholic Charities and Catholic Relief both show articles on their websites confirming their volunteers abetting this travesty.
Travesty because they are helping people? The immigration laws are the travesty. The fact that some people get together and create a law does not make it right or righteous.

Breaking a bad law is bad. Enforcing a bad law is bad. Reforming a bad law is good, but the issue is so hate-filled and racially-charged that lawmakers won’t even consider it. Pity 😦

Something to consider… throughout history, the people who had the courage to break bad laws are the ones we remember. We call them heroes.

Thank God that criminals like Harriet Tubman had the courage to defy bad laws to promote change, as did the signers of the Declaration of Independence, and Rosa Parks, and everyone who sheltered the Jews from persecution and encouraged others to do so… like the Catholic Church and Catholic charities. They had the audacity to put people before the law. :eek:

Any law that dehumanizes an entire group of people is a bad law.

Think about that the next time you advocate separating families for 10+ years, or punishing children for the crimes of their parents, or forcing family members to file for immigration separately and then limiting their ability to visit each other, or charging people exorbitant fees to pursue a dream that might not be realized for close to 20 years… These are all aspects of the bad immigration laws.
Yes, we must help those in need in their own country
I’ll agree, without the qualifier.
and we should absolutely hold business owners in our country accountable and punish them for their transgressions in hiring illegals
Or not. Americans would do the job, but they would demand higher wages. That would drive up the cost of living. Some of us can barely function as it is.
We must help those in need by stimulating economic progress and poliitical reforms in thier own countries.
I agree, but I do not think it must be an either/or situation. We can manage both.
The US cannot maintain these growth rates in our population with out something breaking, and then we’ll all be up a creek.
Sure we can. Whenever man reaches a point of no-return, he discovers how to build a better mouse trap. The Lord provides.
 
As far as illegals seeking aid from the Church. Who determines what falls under the category of “grave need”.
The parish or diocese that is giving the money, of course. There is an overabundance of financial advisors on this thread that are second guessing churches that give money to illegal immigrants. What right does anyone here have to assume that there are others in greater need? Let the local administrator use all money in the wisest fashion. I still do not think legal status should weigh in, at least not for charity.

BTW - It is not illegal immigrants choking or prisons and jails. There are many, but the vast majority or regular citizens.
 
Deb216, You have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the myth that somehow illegal immigrants are the new source of tax wealth for our country!

How much do you believe illegal immigrants are making that they actually pay taxes? Do you know a family of 4 making $45,000 pays exactly 0 in taxes? The argument of paying “sales tax on all of their purchases” is weak. If they rent an apartment, there is no sales tax on probably 25% to 38% of their income. Groceries, another 25% of their income is largely untaxed. Also, there is no tax on the $45 Billion that they send home EVERY YEAR.

Somehow, the math doesn’t work. Either they they are making so much money that they are making a solid contribution to our tax base (thus, not in need) or they are too poor to provide for their needs and are unable to pay taxes.

Schools don’t get paid for, as you call it, “every seat in a seat.” They are funded (different in each state) based generally on property tax receipts. Since illegal immigrants usually can’t purchase a home, they don’t contribute to the tax base.

If a school district has $100 in funding and 20 kids, they “fund” each child at $5 each. If they have $100 and 40 kids, they “fund” each child at $2.50 each. This is the simple truth that people have been trying to get across. There is no magic to any of this if one cares to take ones head out of the sand.

You say:
[sign]
Allow everyone to obtain identification cards and hospitals would always know who is being treated and whom to bill.
Allow everyone to purchase health insurance and nonpayment wouldn’t be as much of an issue
[/sign]

How does this “solve” anything. Today, EVERYONE who wants health insurance is ALLOWED to purchase it. Most of the illegal immigrants DO have identification. What they don’t have in most is money. In some cases, they don’t have a desire to pay. The problems still exist.

Hard to believe that “wishing away” a problem doesn’t really do anything, isn’t it?
 
I’ll continue.
Any law that dehumanizes an entire group of people is a bad law.

… or forcing family members to file for immigration separately and then limiting their ability to visit each other, …These are all aspects of the bad immigration laws.
I guess that means laws which put rapists (an entire group of people) in jail (a dehumanizing place) is bad law? I can’t even believe you made that argument.

Family members are not forced to file for immigration separately, that is unless you mean every possible member of an extended family. Yes, if I’m a potential immigrant and want to bring more than my immediate family, they must file separately. They are separate families. No one is stopping anyone from visiting any body! Unless you mean letting 62 people come on a “visit”!

This is a real problem and we should be taking a fact-based approach and not spin the argument to meet an agenda. Now, I must reflect on why the USCCB will not condemn Catholic politicians who are pro-abortion but they support the anti-Catholic movie The Golden Compass.
 
When we are commanded by our Savior to feed the poor and clothe the naked, no where does he mention that their legal status should be of importance. Not only must the Church reach out with the sacraments to these Catholics, we also have a responsibility to assist them with their physical needs.

It is the responsibility of governments to set immigration policies. In our country good catholics call on all sides of the immigration issue. Whatever one’s opinion, our duty to help those in need is not diminished by where the blame is placed.
👍
 
Here’s my problem: my mother-n-law lives in Mexico.
She’s a Mexican citizen, a hard working elderly woman who raised her children and now lives alone in a poor village. She supports herself by what her children send her and selling soda pop.
She has diabetes, and occasionally has problems with her health. There is no government help, no pension despite her having worked hard all her life, health care is pay up front. She needed xrays a couple of weeks ago, so we sent her some money. I’m a little nervous about being expected to pay for a large part of her emergency medical expenses as she grows older and more frail.
My husband and I will ask her other children to chip in, but they don’t make much money. (I’m an American with a good job, but am stretched to the max with kids and a disabled husband). I am frustrated with the Mexican government, who basically rely on immigrants sending money back to support their parents, instead of using taxes to supply the needs of elderly and needy people. From what I can tell, Mexico is a rich country that could support all its citizens as the US does, but doesn’t choose to.
I heard Mexico is playing around with aid to elderly, but so far it hasn’t reached too many citizens.

Theoretically, we should close the borders and let the situation explode as it would eventually. But while people keep sending money back to support their relatives, it works as a safety valve so the government doesn’t have to change. On the other hand, I can’t let my mother-in-law die in poverty. . . like everyone else with relatives there. So it will never change.
Any information or comments?
 
I really have a hard time believing the we need illegal immigrants to do jobs that Americans feel are too menial with wages that are too low. When I was a kid in the 1950’s the farmers bussed lots of city kids and some adults to the country to harvest the berry crops. There we learned work ethics. If we worked really hard, we made good money and if we didn’t, they fired us and sent us home. We worked along side of seasonal migrants and saw what a good worker could accomplish. Most of us bought school clothes with our wages.

In those days, the migrants went home at the end of the season or moved on to another area to harvest a different crop. Now days they don’t always go home.

Then the legislators stepped in and banned kids from working the fields. This was to protect the migrant children who worked along side of their parents. They didn’t have baby sitters so the whole family was out in the fields. After that American kids couldn’t pick berries either. What a pity.

There are so many able bodied people on unemployment who could be working the jobs that migrants do by we have convinced ourselves that somehow we are too good for manual labor. What a crock!

We don’t need illegals. We can welcome people who come to help out by going through the proper channels. When their time is up, they should go home. They can apply for citizenship and wait in line with their comrades. If they fail to go home when they should they should have to face the consequences unless they have a legitimate reason for not going.

When the Church gets involved in assisting migrants they should be very careful to determine whether they are here legally just as an employer should. We should make every effort to get these people to start out on the right foot by being respecters of the laws of the land that they wish to stay in. Lying, forging documents, and sneaking across the border are not character traits of good law abiding citizens. The Church should not support it.

That doesn’t mean that we are to deprive illegals of life’s necessities. However this should not be ongoing. Feed them, clothe them, and send them home advising them of the proper channels they must go through in order to return. Harboring them from the authorities should not be something that the Church involves itself in.
 
Here’s my problem: my mother-n-law lives in Mexico.
She’s a Mexican citizen, a hard working elderly woman who raised her children and now lives alone in a poor village. She supports herself by what her children send her and selling soda pop.
She has diabetes, and occasionally has problems with her health. There is no government help, no pension despite her having worked hard all her life, health care is pay up front…
I am frustrated with the Mexican government, who basically rely on immigrants sending money back to support their parents, instead of using taxes to supply the needs of elderly and needy people. From what I can tell, Mexico is a rich country that could support all its citizens as the US does, but doesn’t choose to…

Theoretically, we should close the borders and let the situation explode as it would eventually. But while people keep sending money back to support their relatives, it works as a safety valve so the government doesn’t have to change. On the other hand, I can’t let my mother-in-law die in poverty. . . like everyone else with relatives there…
I’m so sorry about your mother-in-law. She is one of many who suffer because the Mexican government is corrupt. Hopefully, the US government will quit messing around and step in and put pressure on Mexico to treat it’s own people more humanely. I hope change comes soon enough to help your loved ones.
 
Deb216, forgive me but are you nuts??? You have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the myth that somehow illegal immigrants are the new source of tax wealth for our country!

How much do you believe illegal immigrants are making that they actually pay taxes?
I am definitely not nuts, thank you, and there are several things that affect my point of view on this issue, none of which are propaganda. I’ll try to break them down for you.

My husband is a foreman in the construction industry. The company has a strict policy of only hiring legal workers, and there is an established system of checks and balances. All applicants must have proof of identification and a valid social security number (SSN). All new hires are required to fill out an I-9 form, which is processed through Homeland Security.

Nevertheless, illegals do get hired. They use names that are associated with a valid SSN, and have virtually flawless ID’s. It can take months or years before the system is alerted and notifies the company because there are no immediate “red flags.”

Imagine 4 people using the same name, address, and SSN. One is legitimate, 3 are ghosts. As far as the system is concerned, one man works for 4 different companies, which is perfectly legal. There would only be a flag if one of them messed up.

When he is notified that an employee isn’t legal, my husband directs the guy to the office, where he will be discharged. He has known some of these guys for a long time without even suspecting that they were illegal. They are highly skilled workers who earn well above the minimum wage because they are paid according to the job that is done, not an hourly wage or salary.

Given the numbers that I have seen, based on actual checks that were paid to illegal immigrants, many of these men are paying hundreds of dollars in taxes per week. Multiply that times the number of months or years that it takes for the employee’s eligibility status to be discovered and you have a considerable amount of money.

Let’s say hubby does payroll for 100 employees per week–people who rotate in and out because of the nature of the trade. Let’s say that only one illegal immigrant is caught every month. Given the number of people he schedules that’s not many, but the company employs 25 foreman.

Now expand it. My numbers were based on a single division of one company that only operates in one area. They also only employ specific trades and they only do residential construction.

Then there are the illegal immigrants who work in regular labor positions. They earn less and pay less in taxes, but there are a lot more of them so they are harder to keep track of. Like skilled laborers, they use fake ID’s to get hired but they are more likely to use stolen or invented SSN. They get caught more often, but they are not married to their identity. If one name is flagged, they will simply be reborn the next day under a new name and number. Because their “work” name is not associated with their “real” name, it isn’t difficult.

I think that if you give serious consideration to the size and scope of the situation, you will see that, if anything, my numbers are are modest.
Do you know a family of 4 making $45,000 pays exactly 0 in taxes? The argument of paying “sales tax on all of their purchases” is weak. If they rent an apartment, there is no sales tax on probably 25% to 38% of their income. Groceries, another 25% of their income is largely untaxed. Also, there is no tax on the $45 Billion that they send home EVERY YEAR.
There is a flaw in your reasoning, and it is based on a false assumption. A family of 4 that earns $45,000 per annum may pay nothing in taxes, but that is based on overall tax liability. To say they paid no taxes is misleading. The taxes are paid throughout the year and then refunded.

The flaw is that that illegal immigrants do not file for tax returns, so the tax monies that are withheld do not get refunded. Ergo, the IRS keeps the money.

Why would they not file for a refund? Because people who want to keep their jobs avoid flagging the system. Multiple claims to the IRS for the same SSN would be a huge red flag, as would a claim that only includes one of many w-4’s. Taxes paid to a fake SSN wouldn’t get refunded, so there is no reason to submit a claim.
Somehow, the math doesn’t work. Either they they are making so much money that they are making a solid contribution to our tax base (thus, not in need) or they are too poor to provide for their needs and are unable to pay taxes.
What makes you assume that illegal immigrants are in need? The only thing many of them need is a change in status. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors.

I stand by what I said. Illegal immigrants pay billions of dollars into the system. To say otherwise is dishonest.
 
Schools don’t get paid for, as you call it, “every seat in a seat.” They are funded (different in each state) based generally on property tax receipts. Since illegal immigrants usually can’t purchase a home, they don’t contribute to the tax base.

If a school district has $100 in funding and 20 kids, they “fund” each child at $5 each. If they have $100 and 40 kids, they “fund” each child at $2.50 each. This is the simple truth that people have been trying to get across. There is no magic to any of this if one cares to take ones head out of the sand.
You are mistaken.
  1. Illegal immigrants can and do purchase homes.
  • Illegal immigrants can be married to a citizen, and purchase the home in the spouses’ name.
  • Illegal immigrants can have children who are citizens and purchase the home in the child’s name.
  • It is legal for an illegal immigrant to purchase a home in his own name, without a SSN. It is just more difficult to secure funding.
  1. School funding is not a simple equation.
  • Property taxes only account for 30-50% of school funding, with the balance being divided by the state and the federal government.
  • The State and Federal government derives its funding from taxes, which illegal immigrants do pay.
  • It will vary by state and district, but enrollment is a determining factor in school funding. Using your example, the school with 20 students and the school with 40 students would not get the same $100. The school with 40 students would get more.
  • While per pupil spending is static, categorical funding is not. If school A has 40 students and school B has 40 students, but school B has a high Title 1 population, school B will get more funding. English as a second language is a Title 1 classification
.
Its pretty easy to blame illegal immigrants for the schools being overcrowded, but that doesn’t make the argument valid.

In a population of 300 million people, there are only an estimated 11 million who are illegals. That’s less than 5%. Not all illegal immigrants have children. In fact, 60% of them don’t. Of the 40% who do have children, 1 in 3 immigrated here without their families. That leaves about 3 million illegals living in the US with their families. But, that doesn’t account for the fact that many of them are married to American citizens. Their children are not just “anchor” babies, but citizens by blood. Americans can marry whomever they want to. Statistically, the number of illegal children, and anchor babies, is relatively low–too low to be the determining factor in schools being overcrowded.

And before you fret over that number, remember that 60% of illegal immigrants don’t have children, nor were they educated here. They are paying into a system they did not benefit from, and do not benefit from, and that more than makes up for whatever is lost.
 
The flaw is that that illegal immigrants do not file for tax returns, so the tax monies that are withheld do not get refunded. Ergo, the IRS keeps the money.

Why would they not file for a refund? Because people who want to keep their jobs avoid flagging the system. Multiple claims to the IRS for the same SSN would be a huge red flag, as would a claim that only includes one of many w-4’s. Taxes paid to a fake SSN wouldn’t get refunded, so there is no reason to submit a claim.

What makes you assume that illegal immigrants are in need? The only thing many of them need is a change in status. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors.

I stand by what I said. Illegal immigrants pay billions of dollars into the system. To say otherwise is dishonest.
So, according to you, we have enough illegals committing fraud against the US [using someone else’s stolen identity] to pay billions of dollars to Uncle Sam. Ergo, that’s okay because their employers have withheld taxes. I DO believe you are telling the truth.

You just confirmed the need for aggressive enforcement of immigration laws. Any sympathy I had for the plight of the illegal just dissolved.
 
That doesn’t mean that we are to deprive illegals of life’s necessities. However this should not be ongoing. Feed them, clothe them, and send them home advising them of the proper channels they must go through in order to return. Harboring them from the authorities should not be something that the Church involves itself in.
I do not think the word “harboring” is accurate at all. Unless one is housing them and helping them to avoid the law, they are not harboring them. I do think you have a valid point in pointing out things that can be done to help that have a more long term impact. I strongly think if one really wants to help any immigrants, legal or not, ESL courses are a great way to help. I also think the Church could be a channel for information on how to legally enter and encourage these people to respect the laws of the every nation.
 
I simply LOVE all this bantering! It makes for a good read…do you all know that it’s ALL in God’s hands and HIS plans for us? If a person is standing in front of me, I can see him, touch him, feel him, he is there. I need to love him and help him however I can. Mother Teresa said “Do not come to Calcutta, find your own Calcutta.” Meaning help those you can here and now, right in front of you. I do ask this: What would cause you to pick up your 3 kids ages 8, 9 and 12, and walk them through the desert, literally? The only answer I come up with is Desperation! Peace to all and Merry Christmas…
 
I do ask this: What would cause you to pick up your 3 kids ages 8, 9 and 12, and walk them through the desert, literally? The only answer I come up with is Desperation! Peace to all and Merry Christmas…
Exactly! These people can not pay for visa or even if they are able to they will not get them. Besides immigration visa are issued only to members of one’s family or to refugees. There are no immigration visa for others. Most people here do not have idea how the immigration machinery works or they do not care. It is difficult, expensive and very corrupt. As catholics we should follow the teachings of the Church on this matter. To help those people in need in spite of their status.
 
As catholics we should follow the teachings of the Church on this matter. To help those people in need in spite of their status.
I agree that we should follow the Church’s teachings, on this matter as well as all others. The disagreement is over what that means. The belief that we are morally obligated to facilitate the presence of illegals among us by providing for their needs is untrue: the bishops have not defined any specific response as a moral obligation.

The following is typical of the language the bishops use in discussing the problem of illegal immigration (letter from the Maryland bishops): mdcathcon.org/main.asp?page=1119

“We therefore urge Maryland Catholics to consider prayerfully the question of immigration, including illegal immigration.”

“Marylanders of good will must come together to honestly, respectfully, and prayerfully discuss their concerns about immigration.”

That is, we are “urged to consider” and we should “prayerfully discuss”, not “you are morally obligated”. If the bishops are unwilling to define a specific response as “following the teaching of the Church” then you have no grounds for believing that those who disagree with you are rejecting the teaching of the Church.

Ender
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top