This made me think of King Henry VIII
KIng Henry did not think that his wives met his criteria of what "marriage should be (produce a male heir).
Honestly, are you proposing that heterosexual married persons have never met people outside their marriage that do not fit their concept of a “PERFECT” partner?!?!
Do you think that such persons are unable to remain pure to their marriage vows? Why would you assume that a person who has SSA would be any different? I find that whole line of reasoning insulting.
Conflict in marriage is expected, and is part of how God intends that we be made holy. A priest once told me that we no longer need to wear camel’s hair shirts because we live with them!
I agree with you that most conflicts in marriage occur because of what one, the other, or both partners think “should be”. Our unrealistic expectations are the root of most of our conflicts in life.
To suggest that a person with SSA would have any different “conflicts” than a person who does not have this, or that they would be faithless to their marriage vows as a result seems quite bigoted.
Such a statement reveals a complete lack of knowledge about the history of marriage.
Also I imagine the straight spouse could face some serious temptation if they later met a nice member of the opposite sex who (reasonably appropriately) demonstrated that they were attracted to them.
How is this any different from a heterosexual couple that marries because the woman is pregnant? Should a Catholic who has repented of pre-marital sex, and married the parent of their child, expect they will never be disappointed or tempted?
There is not reason that this connection cannot come after the marriage.