I'm calling on everyone here in this forum EXCEPT Catholics !!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ag_not
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh! in case anyone cares. Met with a priest today. Am beginning RCIA classes to help me focus my issues with the RCC and prayerfully prepare either to regularize my relations with the Church should I decide that is the direction the Holy Ghost is leading me. Please do keep me in prayer.
 
Oh! in case anyone cares. Met with a priest today. Am beginning RCIA classes to help me focus my issues with the RCC and prayerfully prepare either to regularize my relations with the Church should I decide that is the direction the Holy Ghost is leading me. Please do keep me in prayer.
:hug3: We can swop notes 😛
 
Oh! in case anyone cares. Met with a priest today. Am beginning RCIA classes to help me focus my issues with the RCC and prayerfully prepare either to regularize my relations with the Church should I decide that is the direction the Holy Ghost is leading me. Please do keep me in prayer.
I care alot. Hope you enjoy the classes.
 
I read the Council of Trent CANONS again…well, especially after our conversations here in this thread. And the canons just made me shake my head and confirmed to me again why I am not a Roman Catholic . . . .

. . . .So, unless you have some official document canceling out the COT Canons, well, I’m sure the Pope would be able to smell the sulpher on me already if he were ever to visit here. Surely, at least SOME of you can, too. 😦 And this is not even all the cannons. You can add the retraction of the Council of Trent to my list of reasons why I could never join the RC Church – I’d forgotten about that Council’s pronouncements (I must be getting old). 😛

R.A
Richard:

Try the Councils of Orange on for size:

creeds.net/ancient/orange.htm

Also take a closer look at the Catechism of the Catholic Church
 
Flame: So . . .you are hopeful of God’s Heaven for yourself.

RA: OH, no no no no. I KNOW I;m going to heaven. If there is a heaven, if there is a God, if the Bible is true – I am there already. It’s a done deal. It’s completed. I am already resurrected and glorified in my mind. I have the Holy Spirit as a seal/guarantee of my position as a child of God. I am sealed unto the day of redemption. 😃

R.A.
 
Flame: So . . .you are hopeful of God’s Heaven for yourself.

RA: OH, no no no no. I KNOW I;m going to heaven. If there is a heaven, if there is a God, if the Bible is true – I am there already. It’s a done deal. It’s completed. I am already resurrected and glorified in my mind. I have the Holy Spirit as a seal/guarantee of my position as a child of God. I am sealed unto the day of redemption. 😃

R.A.
I’ve just spat my coffee out 😦

Dang.
 
Flame: So . . .you are hopeful of God’s Heaven for yourself.

RA: OH, no no no no. I KNOW I;m going to heaven. If there is a heaven, if there is a God, if the Bible is true – I am there already. It’s a done deal. It’s completed. I am already resurrected and glorified in my mind. I have the Holy Spirit as a seal/guarantee of my position as a child of God. I am sealed unto the day of redemption. 😃

R.A.
AMEN!
 
Flame: So . . .you are hopeful of God’s Heaven for yourself.

RA: OH, no no no no. I KNOW I;m going to heaven. If there is a heaven, if there is a God, if the Bible is true – I am there already. It’s a done deal. It’s completed. I am already resurrected and glorified in my mind. I have the Holy Spirit as a seal/guarantee of my position as a child of God. I am sealed unto the day of redemption. 😃

R.A.
.

👍 :extrahappy:
 
AG: I’ve just spat my coffee out

RA: I would, too, if I had to read how someone could be that sure of their relationship to God, and that positive of the love and salvation that no one (and nothing) could destroy – while I was still trying to work my way to heaven (oh, sorry, with God’s grace). :eek:

RA
 
I’ve just spat my coffee out 😦

Dang.
That is leaning precariously toward the sin of presumption.

Scripture says: “Faith is the assurance of things that we hope for, the evidence of things unseen.”

While RA says he “KNOWS,” he means that his eternal security is something he has faith in and has a blessed hope for. As much as he “KNOWS,” it has been revealed to him through the Scriptures. Those same Scriptures are ours as Catholics. Talking past one another isn’t going to amount to anything.

Once again,
agreement of definitions would be necessary for a real discussion of apologetics, otherwise people keep talking past one another and getting really frustrated at the same time.

Terms to agree upon:

To Know: www.m-w.com
(1): to perceive directly : have direct cognition of ** (2): to have understanding of (3): to recognize the nature of : discern b (1): to recognize as being the same as something previously known (2): to be acquainted or familiar with
**
Hope:
newadvent.org/cathen/07465b.htm
**
Presumption: ** newadvent.org/cathen/12403a.htm
 
AG: I’ve just spat my coffee out

RA: I would, too, if I had to read how someone could be that sure of their relationship to God, and that positive of the love and salvation that no one (and nothing) could destroy – while I was still trying to work my way to heaven (oh, sorry, with God’s grace). :eek:

RA
The idea that Catholics have to work their way to heaven is convoluted and a total misconception of the theological virtue of hope.
 
**grace: **While RA says he “KNOWS,” he means that his eternal security is something he has faith in and has a blessed hope for. As much as he “KNOWS,” it has been revealed to him through the Scriptures. Those same Scriptures are ours as Catholics. Talking past one another isn’t going to amount to anything.

RA: Yes. I can only know what I know. And from the Bible, and form my own inner love for Jesus, and the witness of the Holy Spirit to my heart, and the testimony of my life (see James 2), I can say with full assurance I KNOW I will go to heaven and live forever with my God.

grace: working to heaven…

RA: Now, I DID say with God’s grace, as a qualifier. 🙂

RA
 
Oh happy day, La la la la, Oh Hap-py Daaaaay, la la la la…:extrahappy: :dancing: :egyptian: :extrahappy:

RA
 
Richard:

If salvation did not rest at least in part on hope, then hope would not be specified as a virtue. “We hope for what do not see” (Romans 8:24-25).

Even you qualified yourself to some degree by pointing out " . . .IF there is a God . . .", “IF the Bible is true . . .” . I would add to those qualifiers:

IF your interpretation, built of a framework of a select number of passages while making others subordinate to that framework, is correct.

I have had people tell me ‘of a surety’ that Christ would return before 1988, and yet again before AD 2000. You’re of an age with me and likely recall those doomsday fads that swept the Evangelical world. Obviously, eschatology is not intended by God to be so clear as soteriology, yet it is perfectly true–and Catholics can say this as much as Evangelicals–that “we HAVE BEEN saved, we ARE BEING saved, we WILL BE saved”.

You cannot, finally, be assured that despite your bold assertions, you have not boasted in that which you have not received. That your professions, for all their boasting, for all their theological correctness, might not be a false confidence. That you, like those spoken of in the epistles of John might not ultimately go way from Christ “because they were never truly of us”. (I Jn 2:19)

I cannot tell if you are a hard-shell Calvinist who believes in double predestination–the position which I hold, frankly–or if you hold to some form of moderate Calvinism, but the fact is that the election theory suffers from a fatal flaw. Yes, the promises of God are certain, and He will perform all His purposes . . . . .but YOU cannot be certain, in this life, that YOU, beyond all disputing are an object of those promises.

Over and above that . . .the cheese seems to have moved. Your earlier point was that the Catholic Church, by it’s own lights, had by it’s anathema condemned you to Hell. My response was that the Catholic Church does anathematize you–it does exclude you from full fellowship within it’s body, unless and until such time as you accept Her teachings and repent of your heresies–but She does NOT suggest that you are absolutely, irrevocably, bound for Hell. “Those who are without, God will judge”, (I Cor 5:15).
Richard Abanes:
And from the Bible, and form my own inner love for Jesus, and the witness of the Holy Spirit to my heart, and the testimony of my life (see James 2), I can say with full assurance I KNOW I will go to heaven and live forever with my God.
You might reference Job 4:6 (NIV): Should not your piety be your confidence and your blameless ways your hope? Take note of who was speaking in verse 1.

And aside from the specific theological construct which you bring to the Scriptures–how is the ‘witness of the Holy Spirit’ and the “witness of my life” in your case–or in mine–different from the “witness” which constitutes a ‘testimony’ among Mormons? There IS a reason why even very learned and very solid Bible Christians hold to an Arminian position which places more emphasis upon the hope we have in God our Savior (Psalm 25:5, NIV) than upon our own smug reading of the text.
 
There is another point regarding the eternal security debate. And that is, as I’m sure most on this thread know, that there are other Protestant denominations who will just as vigorously deny eternal security (using scripture, of course) as there are those who affirm it.

Setting aside the relative scriptural merits of each case for the moment, one is once again struck by the impotence of Sola Scriptura to resolve the issue. For there are many,… a housewife raising three kids, a man working two jobs to support his family, etc. who perhaps have neither the time, inclination, or even intellectual aptitude to take the Bible, study it (and the Greek!) and come to a conclusion. Hence they must rely on a conclusion which of necessity may be quite unformed.

Thus believing God wants us to know certain truths regarding our salvation with certainty (even if we can’t study the doctrines out in scripture for ourselves all the time), perhaps God did found a Church, which He has witnessed to over the centuries through the unchanging dogma, miracles, holiness of her Saints, unviversality, and apostolic succession, which could settle these debates (ultimately because of His guidance and His promises).

It is interesting to me to note, that if Sola Scriptura were to be the modus operandi for Christians, why Jesus came centuries before the printing press and the widespread distribution of the Bible?
 
Oh! in case anyone cares. Met with a priest today. Am beginning RCIA classes to help me focus my issues with the RCC and prayerfully prepare either to regularize my relations with the Church should I decide that is the direction the Holy Ghost is leading me. Please do keep me in prayer.
Will do! Proud of you. You know your stuff more than you know.
 
I have to say,all religion aside, I feel cocky saying oh yeah I am so going to heaven, by any means. I would certainly hope so, but to just assume for any reason just feels really rude and presumptuos to God. Who am I to say that? It’s His decision. What a fool I would feel like the day that I die, and I am just happy as can be assuming I am saved bc Jesus died on the cross for my sins, and not by any merit of my own to go with that, and He says, “Uh noooo, see ya later sister.” or “Off to Purgatory you go, see ya”. Can we say mortified?–hello! Not to mention humiliated and very repentant. The bar is set very high to get into heaven, even if you are a good person, you’re going to purgatory, you would have to be near perfection, or the perfect cute grandma down the street, so I would rather not live in denial or make a big bafoon out of myself before God any more than I am sure I have at some point in my life.
 
Hmm, context. Okay, context is always helpful, so here goes. Ahem!

Jesus and His disciples were, at the time this scene took place, in Cesarea-Phillipi. They were standing at the foot of a large rock/cliff, into which was built a temple to Pan. At the foot of this cliff, where they were standing, was a spring of sorts, an opening in the rock out of which flowed a stream. This opening was known as the Gates of Hades. This temple of Pan was built on a rock that would eventually be eroded by a stream, ensuring that it would eventually collapse, even if the temple itself was kept in good condition in the mean time.

Jesus told Peter that His Church would be built upon a rock that would never be subject to erosion or collapse. It would never be worn down by the ages or suffer destruction. That stream is still there, and has worn a large ragged hole in the side of the cliff. The ruins of the temple can also be found, which has suffered some considerable erosion of its own.

Hopefully this bit of context has been helpful!
Thank you for context. May be good to consider God’s ‘opinion’ on where Truth on Earth is: 1 Timothty 3:15: In the Apostles and the Church. Dogmatically proven over 2000 years. And no one has found God saying Earthly authority or truth is in a Book He is authorizing to be written For Same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top