I totally agree with @Midori,
I said the same thing in my post.
The best for baby confort and mother too, is to take a physiological carrier, like thoses of Midori, or thoses of my post.
Most BabyBjorn, who claim ergonomy, are not physiological carrier that are healthy for baby back, neek, pelvis or genitals. It can be dangerous to let them stay to long on thoses carriers. It is also a back killer for the adult who carry him past a few mouths.
A position that is highly contested is the putting the child “facing the world” (the third Midori picture, on her 2nd post), because it is not very natural, nor feeling the baby safe, nor physiologicam. It is not used outside the western societies. Back or side position are better as an alternative as the baby grow.
I said the same thing in my post.
The best for baby confort and mother too, is to take a physiological carrier, like thoses of Midori, or thoses of my post.
Most BabyBjorn, who claim ergonomy, are not physiological carrier that are healthy for baby back, neek, pelvis or genitals. It can be dangerous to let them stay to long on thoses carriers. It is also a back killer for the adult who carry him past a few mouths.
A position that is highly contested is the putting the child “facing the world” (the third Midori picture, on her 2nd post), because it is not very natural, nor feeling the baby safe, nor physiologicam. It is not used outside the western societies. Back or side position are better as an alternative as the baby grow.
Last edited: