O
obadiah
Guest
sorry, I just donât want people to think Iâm trying to convert others to islam.^ hey wheres your sense of humor?![]()
sorry, I just donât want people to think Iâm trying to convert others to islam.^ hey wheres your sense of humor?![]()
Very small,⌠but big enough.The hatred against Muslims has been created by our politicians and mainstream media. There are over a billion Muslims in the world. What percentage do you think are involved in terrorism?
How much fighting do you suppose there was between the various moslem peoples during these time periods?Look at the major wars of the Twentieth Century. I am referring to World Wars One and Two, Korea, and Viet Nam. Not much Muslim involvement, Iâd say.
And how many would be killed if there WERE NO GOVERNMENTS�Political science professor emeritus Rudolph Rummel, from the University of Hawaii, wrote a book in 1994 intitled DEATH BY GOVERNMENT. Professor Rummel determined that there were some 38 milliion battle deaths in the Twentieth Century. At least 170 million people were killed by their own governments during this period for various ethnic, racial, tribal or political reasons. Another fact, of the 60 million deaths during World War Two, only 16 million involved combatants.
Your point being? Does it minimize being killed by a terrorist if you have a government to âworry aboutââŚ?Statistically, you have a much better chance of being killed by your own government, than being killed in a war, let alone by âMuslimâ terrorists.
The âpolice stateâ to the anarcho-juvenile is code-speak for âPapaâ.The threat of terrorism, specifically from Islamic groups is being used to create a police state here in the US.
Does everyone feel that âwarm fuzzyâ satisfaction that the âpersecution complexâ arises in EVERY new generationâŚ?Many Americans are welcoming the idea of politicians spying on them, searches without warrants, detaining individuals indefinitely without charges, secret trials and torture.
You keep thinking that way, little one.I really think the Islamic fears pale in comparison to what is going on right now in this country.
You can read about Professor Rummel at this website:
fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=4936
i ia oe. Aloha nui.Fair enough,abu kamoon; Because you are indeed correct.Let me start again by stating that I am not a Muslim, nor an apologist for Islam. I am a Catholic. That said, let me relate my experiences with Muslims. I lived in Morocco for 17 months and Iraq for 11.
âŚ
Muslims are people, just like everybody else. Some are good and some are bad.
You see - there you have made a FUNDAMENTAL mistake that novices make. You have equated someone behaving AGAINST the teachings of Jesus Christ with someone behaving ACCORDING to the teachings of Muhammad.
No I equated someone commiting violence in the name of one religion with one commiting violence in the name of another.
Violence is evil, right? Let us take that as a premise.
Christians commit violence AGAINST the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Preaching to the choir here.
HoweverâŚ
Muslim terrorist commit violence ACCORDING TO the teachings of Muhammad.
Thatâs the problem!!! Are these acts in fact according to the teaching of Mohammed? Yes there are many militant verses in the Koran, but were they meant as eternal principles for Muslims to live by for all time or were they only for a specific time and context, as were the aformentioned Old Testament verses? I have heard Muslims say the latter. Again it is for the Islamic community to decide.
I will grant you that Islamic efforts to reform and reinterpret Islam my fail. Itâs big weakness is that it is not an institution that can exist as seperate from the state like the Catholic Church does. Also, at the risk of drawing a fatwa, I believe Mohammedâs biggest blunder was not naming a succesor or any authority to interpret Islam. For these reasonâs Islam has been at the mercy of any group with power enough to interpret the Koran as they like.
There is a concept of independent reasoning in Islam called ijtihad, in which scholars could study a question and offer a ruling.But
âIn the eleventh century, however, to consolidate their control, the Sunni ulama crysallized their legal judgements into various schools of Islamic jurisprudence and bannedijthad. With the gates of independent interpretation closed, the traditionalists imposed there own conservative positions on mainstream Islamic jurisprudence, and these have remained largely frozen for almost a milleniaum.â(Foriegn Affairs,Jan.-Feb., 2006 p. 26)
In sum, there is plenty to legitimately criticize Islamic civilization for, both now and in the past, but to make generalizations about Islam being an intrinsically violent religion is going too far. It is theoretically possible that the Muslim to take a more peaceful attitude towards the world. Or it may be that the extremist may take over completely. We canât presume to know the outcome. We also canât discourage those who would reinterpret Islam by telling them there faith is violent by nature.
Thanks,
Rodrigo
I do not condone any of the bad things Mohammed did do. Nor am I an Islamic apologist, believe me. I have no love for Islamic civilization. my concern is making knee jerk reactions and generalizations such as Islam being intrinsically violent. Christians did that to the Jews in the middle ages and we are still trying to live that down. We can not make that same mistake with the Muslims.This is a lie.
No it isnât! It is historical fact.
Besides, according to Islamic law made up by Muhammad all the Muslims deserved to die for apostatizing from paganism.
The above doesnât make any sense. I thought Mohammed wanted people to convert from paganism.
Quit your double-standards.
What double standards?
Another lie.
No Again fact.
Besides - that hardly excuses your collective punishments against the innocent women and children whom Muhammad exiled or enslaved.
Please quit your Islamo apologetics.
I am not defending Islam. I am only criticizing extreme and simplisic views on a complicated situation. As Christians we are to do everything in the spirit of love and truth.(I DO read my Bible) We are also to be peacemakers. Calling Islam evil does none of these things.(anti Christic? Okay. that is a fair criticism)I too am sick and tired of so called christians defending evil antichrist islam. Either take shahada and become muslim, or repent and read your Bible.
I am not defending Islam. I am only criticizing extreme and simplisic views on a complicated situation. As Christians we are to do everything in the spirit of love and truth.(I DO read my Bible) We are also to be peacemakers. Calling Islam evil does none of these things.(anti Christic? Okay. that is a fair criticism)
There is plenty in Islamic history that infuriates me. Much of how Islam was used was indeed evil. But I have to make a distinction between Islamic *religion ***
While not every Muslim is violent, Islam itself is inherently violent. Violence and hatred against disbelievers is a core doctrine - in explicit detail in the Quran.
You cannot equate past Christian anti-semitism with Islamic anti-disbelievers because of the simple fact that the Bible does not teach anti-semitism. Jesus Christ did not tell his followers to persecute Jews. If any Christians did that - then they have done so without his approval.
That is not the same with Islam. Muhammad himself told Muslims to hate and commit violence against disbelievers.
I hope you will come to see the difference.
I converted to Islam in the early 70s, I converted to Christianity after that. I AM AN APOSTATE MUSLIM. I DARE ANY MUSLIM TO EXECUTE ME. ISLAM IS AN EVIL ANTICHRIST RELIGION.I have never been to a muslim country. I have never been to an arabic-speaking country.
I have had my life threatened by muslims 3 times in the last 2 years, on all occasions for being openly Christian, rather than secular. All within 100 miles of my residence, in fact.
I have had my life, my freedom to travel inside my own country, and my right to privacy trampled because of a dozen or two angry muslims who decided to hijack a few planes and use them as weapons.
I have known few muslims, and have seen much violence done in the name of the Allah of the Muslims, albeit remotely. I have never met an obvious muslim who was not openly in favor of violence against at least some non-muslims. All the muslims Iâve gotten to know have shown me that they consider all non-muslims grist for the mill of muslim aggression. Even a 12 year old citing the Quâran to justify lying to teachers.
A muslim man used being muslim as an affirmative defense for beating his wife to death in the US Midwest.
Iâm not Islamophobic. My fear of Islam is reasonable and well founded, and therefore fails the DSM definitions of phobia. My fear of Muslims is far less than my fear of their religion.
Who said anything about hating people for disagreeing with your religion? I donât care what someone thinks about my religion, but as soon as they start trying to blow me up, then I get a little touchy.Because Muslims donât recognize the divinity of Jesus Christ, seeing him as a prophet, is that cause to hate them? Do you feel the same way about Jews?
We donât accept Muhammed as a prophet in Christianity, whereas the Jews reject Jesus Christ. Freedom of religion means that we are free to believe what we will. I think some people need to learn a little tolerance.
Itâs an interesting example you chose of the hateful media/politician dynamic. Do you realize that the same liberal media and politicians that came up with Affirmative Action and perpetuate the stereotype of blacks as thugs are the same people who want us to believe that Islam is a peaceful religion? If they were so bent on âequal opportunity hateâ then why arenât they all over Muslims too?The media in the country is dedicated to producing propaganda for our politicians. Much of that propaganda is aimed at producing hatred. Blacks have been portrayed as criminal buffons by the media, while our politicians come up with programs like âAffirmative Actionâ All Affirmative Action does is to portray blacks as incapable of competing against whites. This creates friction between blacks and whites.
What, because one forum that not nearly enough people know about is really a place to spread such an important message of Islamic peace? No names, no pictures, no publicity, no risk at all for someone who wants to pretend they are speaking out against violence. This forum is a valuable method of exchanging ideas, but it is not a media outlet. The liberal media would like nothing better than to have a significant number of Muslims start proclaiming peace, because thatâs what they want to believe. But it hasnât happened yet. Thatâs why the few hollow statements from organizations like CAIR are plastered all over the media. Thatâs all there is! And the tiny handful of Muslims who do try to criticize Islam are often silenced because someone is afraid that itâs going to offend other Muslims.Muslims are also targeted. Certainly there are terrorist groups in the Middle East, but they are not reflective of most Muslims. Some Americans say: why donât you peaceful Muslims speak up? Well, they do. You hear them on the Catholic Forum all the time. People argue with them.
Why donât you hear Muslims in the media speaking out against terrorism? Because they donât fit in with the message the media present.
Who cares? Itâs as irrelevant as whether they had red hair or not UNLESS you can draw a causal link between the teachings of Jesus, the history of Christian thought, and their actionsAnd what was the religion of those who perpetuated the St. Bartholomews Day Massacre? Or the 30 years war? Or the Salem Witch Trials?
Those âbad thingsâ Muhammed did are denied by Moslems as being bad!I do not condone any of the bad things Mohammed did do. Nor am I an Islamic apologist, believe me. I have no love for Islamic civilization. my concern is making knee jerk reactions and generalizations such as Islam being intrinsically violent. Christians did that to the Jews in the middle ages and we are still trying to live that down. We can not make that same mistake with the Muslims.
Well, itâs nice to see that you understand that radical Islam is a violent, agenda-driven ideology very similar to socialist Marxism, as opposed to the Christian Faith.It takes an ideology that diminishes the individual and his/her right at freedom of choice and expression.
Itâs why we saw Marxist IRA members able to blow up pubs. Why socialist/Marxist Tamils can blow themselves up. And why Moslems can do the same.
Buddhism respects life. Christianity respects life.
Youâre right. The terrorists do. The terrorists are the ones who need to learn to be more tolerant.I think some people need to learn a little tolerance.
Thanks for the thumbs upThatâs a start.
At least youâre not projecting the Christian mindset onto Islam and saying âOh, but itâs a peaceful, loving, tolerant religion!â as so many are doing.
HiBuddhism respects life. Christianity respects life.
At least youâre not projecting the Christian mindset onto Islam and saying âOh, but itâs a peaceful, loving, tolerant religion!â as so many are doing.
HiBuddhism respects life. Christianity respects life.
What measure do you use for concluding this?Hi
Buddhism respects life. Christianity respects life. Islam respects life more than Buddhism and Christianity, only if they could understand the peaceful Islam.