C
CradleRC58
Guest
The chosen one ?
Who’d have thought ?
:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
Who’d have thought ?
:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
When you post parts of sentences or replies you are beingAquinas11:![]()
Ergo …?Every post that you fail to supply a definition
If you mean this conversation, you have a point.WHOLE THING IS A SHAM
It isn’t clear to me that any Christian is required to ask forgiveness from you personally concerning their transgressions in life.No! Wrong. An atheist might recognise or have remorse for a wrong done to another.
A Christian saying no reason to ask for forgiveness tells you he has no remorse or conscience on the subject
Far from it @OneSheep7_Sorrows:![]()
Actually, I was quite impressed with a snippet of what Nadler said yesterday. There are writings from early US history, Madison was one, and others who specifically stated that for a president to pardon members of his staff, those who could say something against him but are basically kept from speaking in order to protect the president, is in itself an impeachable offense.I feel sorry for Judge Roberts having to listen to
this boring and repetitive testimony.
This president has done the above with the entire executive branch. And with the Senate basically acting in Trump’s defense, they turn the constitution upside down.
It’s tyranny.
Two pieces of real news today that impinge upon the impeachment saga.And this comes in the very same thread where you challenge me that I am somehow wrong when I say that some are vastly underestimating how many people get their ‘news’ from propaganda sources and come on sites like this and Facebook to defend the indefensible.
True, YOU often describe Trumpism as a cult.Trumpism is often described as a cult.
If you think putting on a 3 day free campaign ad filledSchiff was really really impressive
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)Far from it @OneSheep
Very important news.drcube:![]()
Two pieces of real news today that impinge upon the impeachment saga.And this comes in the very same thread where you challenge me that I am somehow wrong when I say that some are vastly underestimating how many people get their ‘news’ from propaganda sources and come on sites like this and Facebook to defend the indefensible.
https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites...Order 16-1182 17-52 17-375 17-679 200123.pdf
- Presiding FISA judge James Boasberg wrote in a January 7 order that the last two FISA warrants on Carter Page (April 7, 2017 and June 29, 2017) were not valid. The status of the other two warrants is also in question. This potentially puts into jeopardy all the convictions that occurred as a result of the Mueller Special Counsel, if any evidence relevant to those convictions was obtained by surveillance (two step rule) as a result of those warrants.
DOJ Rules Comey’s FBI Had ‘Insufficient Predication To Establish Probable Cause’ In FISA Scandal | The Daily Wire
Whistleblower Was Overheard in '17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump | RealClearInvestigations
- Eric Ciaramella – very likely the anonymous “whistleblower" who kicked off the entire impeachment fiasco – was overheard by a former colleague discussing with another staffer in the White House how to remove President Trump from office. This was just two weeks after President Trump took office. The other staffer was Sean Misko, who subsequently went to work for Adam Schiff. Both were angry over Trump’s new “America First” approach to international affairs. The reason we haven’t heard from Ciaramella (the whistleblower whose “evidence” lead to the impeachment hearing) is precisely because it is known that Ciaramella was working with a Schiff staffer before blowing the whistle.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)Except there was no evidence. Innuendo.
The messages, written in Russian, show Lutsenko urging Parnas to force out Yovanovitch in exchange for cooperation regarding Biden. At one point, Lutsenko suggests he won’t make any helpful public statements unless “madam” is removed.
“It’s just that if you don’t make a decision about Madam — you are calling into question all my declarations. Including about B ,” Lutsenko wrote to Parnas in a March 22 message on WhatsApp.