U
umamibella
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7058b/7058be28ad449c73e1698319e7118719012af74b" alt="7news.com.au"
Chicken imported to China from Brazil tests positive for COVID
Coronavirus has been detected on product packaging across several cities in China, sparking concerns over the safety of imported foods.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e09b1/e09b189d919ce71da208f71a73906d59e6c1bbfc" alt="7news.com.au"
A virus can also be on local products.Another good reason to get away from globalized economies/food supply chains. Get back to local.
If shipping to another country takes a week or more any virus would be dead.They can, but they won’t spread around the world on products.
That’s what many studies show and even if it survived longer (no evidence of that) the chances of it being able to actually infect someone is almost non-existent.Should be and are/is aren’t always the same.
As long as it is not “Corona Beer” we are good.
Its also been found on other frozen goods.It’s not clear to me if the detected virus was actually on the surface of the chicken or the packaging that contained the chicken.
Exactly. Two points , it is not fussy about the point of origin of the plastic or food surface it is hanging around on.A virus can also be on local products.
Your theory may change this week.From what I have read there is no evidence of anyone anywhere being infected from items that have been shipped to another country or even domestically delivered to your door.
Packaging from items shipped are the lowest risk.
May I recommend Human Scale by Kirkpatrick Sale?This probably isn’t possible anymore. Autarky is a dream of the 20th century that’s basically unfeasible. Ignoring the fact that you probably can’t produce the great mass of consumer products domestically, I don’t see how manufacturing industry could sacrifice the higher rate of profit they get from overseas production.
Its still low risk and not something that should be prioritised.Your theory may change this week.
Goods get shipped much faster then a week, especially by air
Survival of this virus on surfaces, at least three days, and chilling and freezing included, is a different study and a different discussion.Its still low risk and not something that should be prioritised.
By the way it is not my theory. It’s the result of studies done on the survival of the virus on various surfaces.
We do know from the studies that have been done.We dont know yet what risk the migration of this virus on packaging holds
Not about the potential of migration and transmission, thats just a new thing.We do know from the studies that have been done.
To date there is no evidence of a single person on the planet being infected by food packaging (frozen or otherwise) or indeed by any type of packaging of home deliveries.Not about the potential of migration and transmission, thats just a new thing.
We are dealing with a novel virus that will likely be around for a very long time, potentially lead to a second pandemic, and is throwing up new discoveries in very swift time spans.