B
Br.Rich_SFO
Guest
WE are saved by God’s Grace, through our Faith, Manifested in works.
Ok, I hear ya…but I’m still confused…The current Pope has said NOTHING infallibly EXCEPT: women cannot be priests. On the other hand, those quotes are from INFALLIBLE councils. Never has an excption been defined by the Church. Certainly the new catechism is NOT infallible, as the Pope himself had to put out CORRECTIONS. God bless.
I’d tell them to accept the free gift of Grace from God and live a holy life, for however long they have. If they had not been Baptized and were in immenent danger of immediate death I would Baptize them, otherwise, if this was their choice, I would get a Priest to offer them the applicable sacraments.Let me push this a little further.
If someone were on their deathbed and they asked you: What must I do to be saved? How would you answer?
Mel
I was always told the person who, at the hour of their death, calls for the name of Jesus - truly believing at that instant that Jesus IS the Son of God and the way to salvation - will be saved.Let me push this a little further.
If someone were on their deathbed and they asked you: What must I do to be saved? How would you answer?
Mel
I assume you would add “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ”?I’d tell them to accept the free gift of Grace from God and live a holy life, for however long they have. If they had not been Baptized and were in immenent danger of immediate death I would Baptize them, otherwise, if this was their choice, I would get a Priest to offer them the applicable sacraments.
Since it was the sacrifice Christ made for us as the Lamb of God which was the offering for that Grace, then, yes, it would be necessary to believe that Jesus was the Christ, the Lamb of God, and the means God had for bridging the gap between himself and us to deliver that Grace.I assume you would add “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ”?
The current catechism is not infallible. It has many errors, which the Pope himself has had to correct. There is no point in trying to conform what is said infallibly to what is said fallibly. We should merely recognize that what is said fallibly is just that: fallible. We must take what is infallible over what is fallible. God bless.Ok, I hear ya…but I’m still confused…
why then, does the current catechism NOT use the wording you used as the answer for the question about salvation?
And again, I’m not challenging you, just trying to understand the differences better.
So you’re saying I shouldn’t refer to my Catechism book as one of my primary sources of reference because it’s wrong? Being fallible is the same as being incorrect?The current catechism is not infallible. It has many errors, which the Pope himself has had to correct. There is no point in trying to conform what is said infallibly to what is said fallibly. We should merely recognize that what is said fallibly is just that: fallible. We must take what is infallible over what is fallible. God bless.
Whew! What a relief! I was getting worried there. So T.A. Stobie…I still don’t understand, then, why EENS doesn’t consider what I read in the Catechism as binding or true. Do you understand his position???No the catechism is an excellent reference and it contains infallible teachings of the church. It is the wording itself that is not necessarily infallible.
The reason was it was updated was to make some of the wording more clear.
YinYangMom said:Whew! What a relief! I was getting worried there. So T.A. Stobie…I still don’t understand, then, why EENS doesn’t consider what I read in the Catechism as binding or true. Do you understand his position???
I agree. Knowing how we are saved may not help . We don’t need a check list while on our death bed, we need Mercy and a heart turned toward God.I was always told the person who, at the hour of their death, calls for the name of Jesus - truly believing at that instant that Jesus IS the Son of God and the way to salvation - will be saved.
Remember, even the gravest sinner on death row, can be saved if only he calls on Jesus (with a sincere heart, of course).
I get that he’s putting his foundation of Catholic understanding on the Pope’s writings themselves, but I don’t understand why if one can be so Catholic and believe so fervently in the infallability of the Popes that they could so easily dismiss the teachings of those same Popes throughout subsequent years which has resulted in the Catechism. That is where the Catechism comes from, isn’t it? The overall teachings of the Church over the years in one place? Maybe I’m wrong.The problem is that EENS defines salvation through the Catholic Church differently than the pope and councils do. He insists that only through formal membership in the Church can one be saved. Whereas, current teaching says that, yes someone not formally a Catholic can receive graces and yes that person can be saved BUT salvation if it happens somehow (in ways we don’t completely understand) comes through the Church. He will quote a bunch of popes and saints at us but not one that I have read says that actual, formal membership is what is meant by no salvation outside the Church.