Isn’t expecting an inheritance a little like expecting to win the lottery? Couldn’t it just as easily wind up the other way around: there’s no money left for you to inherit, rather you may be caring financially (or otherwise) for your parents in their old age due to expensive health issues, poor financial planning on their parts, unscrupulous financial advisers, etc.?
I have read that in the old days of family farming or small family businesses, parents had an obligation to leave an inheritance to their grown children because the grown children may have worked for their parents for years, and they need the land or the business to come to them for their livelihoods.
Nowadays, however, many monetary inheritances to grown children may not be necessary for their livelihoods, but rather may be used for unnecessary luxuries like a bigger house, a vacation home, a boat, a bigger car, etc. If the grown children are financially comfortable, one could make the argument that the parents should be encouraged to leave their money (beyond expenses associated with the funerals and legal fees to settle the estate) to worthy charities instead of to their grown children.
However, if the grown children are struggling financially or want to put their children through college, it may be a generous final gift of the parents to their grown children or grandchildren. But could that gift be a crutch that enables continued bad spending habits with no more inheritance money to bail them out in the future? Knowledge of one’s grown children’s poor spending habits may influence parents here NOT to leave them any money, in spite of the bad feelings that will result, because it’s in the grown children’s best interests not to support their bad habits, e.g. addictions to drugs/alcohol/gambling/debt, etc.
Personally, I’ve seen copies of my parents’ wills because I’m executor of their estate, and so they naturally gave me copies of the wills and their funeral/burial instructions. So I know they’re basically leaving all the money equally to us four children, assuming there’s anything left over after a (God-willing) long and healthy retirement. It surprised me that they didn’t leave anything to charity, not even to their local parish church, but I suppose we could donate our shares to charity if we wanted to, but it’s our choice. What brought up that question was that I heard that someone (not rich, just middle-class) gave Couple to Couple League over $100,000 a few years ago that they had inherited from their parents, because “they didn’t need it,” and they wanted the money to do some good and not be wasted on things they didn’t need. WOW!