E
Elizabeth502
Guest
Globally, and chronologically, but not nationally (domestically). Not in my opinion.So you could say things are getting better.
Globally, and chronologically, but not nationally (domestically). Not in my opinion.So you could say things are getting better.
AgreedGlobally, and chronologically, but not nationally (domestically). Not in my opinion.![]()
You mean the feelings of a 12-year-old girl who has to have sex with a 40-year-old man she doesnāt even know for the sake of not putting her entire family to shame? Do you think marriages were more successful then just because people HAD to stay married?On the other hand, perhaps there were actually more happy marriages in past eras where we didnāt give so much importance to feelings beforehand. True love leads to loving feelings. But if you just start with and depend only on feelings, you end up with a 50% divorce rate, because feelings change. But love abides.
Not at all. I am only saying that in our own society where we put our feelings first, rather than love and responsibility first, we havenāt shown really great results when it comes to marriage. When one takes marriage vows and means them, it means not elevating oneās own feelings over love of oneās spouse. And I donāt recommend marriage for 12 year olds.You mean the feelings of a 12-year-old girl who has to have sex with a 40-year-old man she doesnāt even know for the sake of not putting her entire family to shame? Do you think marriages were more successful then just because people HAD to stay married?
Looks to me that you will be becoming a priest in the near future right? Sounds lAnd boys come away looking like predatory creeps.
Seriously, you have to watch out for ladies these days, what with their vajazzled nether regions and promiscuous ways. Believe me ladies are out there doing all they can to tempt good, innocent Christian boys who are interested in nothing more than remaining pure and serving God. There should be a law against it.
Thereās nothing more unbecoming than a grown man weeping about sexual freedom!Iāve had two adult men in my office recently, in tears, chewed up by the effects of the sexual revolution. This crazy culture is hurting men, too.
It should be noted that there isnāt an obligation for a woman to have a boyfriend, and in fact a woman that wanted a boyfriend but not sex could probably find one if they wanted (e.g. by going out with a pious Christian or Muslim)
Separate to the issue of modern mores; in the past it was thought that a married woman had an obligation to have sex with her husband, and that there was no such thing as marital rape. If a man raped his wife, in many countries he couldnāt be prosecuted.
And i almost moved to Kentucky?Iāve had two adult men in my office recently, in tears, chewed up by the effects of the sexual revolution. This crazy culture is hurting men, too.
Muslim men do that do they?Your statements are very confusing to me.Muslim men rape and beat their wifes and abuse their children expecially if they become christians.
OK all who are not christian, yes!Muslim men do that do they?
Thatās really insensitive to these men who canāt find trustworthy women to love, who have been badly used by women. Not all men are just a penis looking to score.Thereās nothing more unbecoming than a grown man weeping about sexual freedom!![]()
Well, look that DOES suck and it happens to all of us at one point or another. Anyone who thinks that problem began with the sexual revolution needs to go back and read their Shakespeare , the Greek tragedies or listen to any old-timey country western song!Thatās really insensitive to these men who canāt find trustworthy women to love, who have been badly used by women. Not all men are just a penis looking to score.![]()
This is a huge generalization. I would wager that the vast majority of Muslim men do not beat or rape anyone and are kind and devout people.Your statements are very confusing to me.Muslim men rape and beat their wifes and abuse their children expecially if they become christians.
This is a huge generalization. I would wager that the vast majority of Muslim men do not beat or rape anyone and are kind and devout people.
Please most of them have more then two wives and they still stone people there. This to me is voilent. Perhaps some are going the other way but for centries they have been very voilent to their woman and children and even servents.If what you are saying is the truth then this is good news. Blessings and Peace.![]()
Yes, this is very true.It just occurred to me that the āliberatingā culture started by the sexual revoluation actually created a whole society where many young women feel forced to choose between giving themselves sexually to a boy or being rejected and unpopular. This kind of pressure deserves to be called coercion, and coercion to have sex is rape. Thus the dominant culture practices systemic insitutionalized rape.
I just thought I should share this insight in case it is of help to anyone in explaining why discussion of morals really does belong in the public square.
Well I donāt know if you are being serious, but in case you are: Most Muslim men do not have more that two wives. How would that even work? That would require a population with at least three women for every man. āthey still stone people thereā Which āthereā do you mean? Muslims are all over the world. In Texas, they still put people to death, so execution is not limited to Muslims. I find execution abhorrent whatever the religion or method.Please most of them have more then two wives and they still stone people there. This to me is voilent. Perhaps some are going the other way but for centries they have been very voilent to their woman and children and even servents.If what you are saying is the truth then this is good news. Blessings and Peace.![]()
Sister Angel, you are spreading defamatory misinformation. Simple logic shows, as Kaid mentioned, that your claim would require that the overwhelming majority of Muslims would have to be female. And that isnāt true.Please most of them have more then two wives and they still stone people thereā¦
oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=DetractionAn important difference between detraction and calumny is at once apparent. The calumniator says what he knows to be false, whilst the detractor narrates what he at least honestly thinks is true. Detraction in a general sense is a mortal sin, as being a violation of the virtue not only of charity but also of justice.
ā¦Just want to add, that young men too are coerced in the way you mention, namely through social pressure.
We saw a case like that a few days ago here at CAF where a young Christian guy was not only feeling odd in his culture, but also pushed to get physical by a girl who pressured him with all kinds of abusive language and he was devastated after he half way gave in to her advances.
I have met a number of men who felt that pressure and who were bitterly sad and in anguish after they gave themselves away to someone.
So please also remember men in your talks,⦠even if its easier for them, to some extent, to abstract themselves from their sexual actions due to their more outward physical structure, many of them also feel stupid and sad after they gave themselves away the first time, just like girls.
The voice of conscience and presence of God-given purpose in the spousal nature of our bodies are the same.
By the way,⦠If you only focus on young women in your talks you will be misunderstood by young girls⦠youāll be suspected of double standard (boys will be boys, but women should be chaste and more protected than boys/have more rules).