Instruments to be used at mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marchelli
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
On the other hand, I sing loud and long. So,others might say my instrument (my voice) is terrible. I’ve never been told, but my brother’s is awful, so mine might be the same. I’m mostly there to worship rather than be picky.
Good for you! 👍👍👍

I love the singing when people who don’t sing well join in enthusiastically! 😃 As soon as a few opt out others start to think “Maybe I shouldn’t sing, I’m embarrassing myself…” and then it’s half the congregation gone.
 
I find these threads on catholic music hilarious.

After being in mega Evangelical a Churches with full orchestras or 10 piece rock bands with light shows and big screen TV’s, even the most contemporary Catholic music seems traditional to me!
I agree with this.
 
Just a note about “the keyboard set to ‘organ’.” An electronic keyboard is NOT an organ, regardless of how authentically it reproduces one. It saddens me to see parishes where an old or broken organ is replaced by a keyboard. They are as different from one another as a guitar is from a violin. Organs have manuals which resemble a keyboard or piano, but there are 61 keys, not 88, and they aren’t weighted like a piano. Organs normally have two or more manuals as well as stops to alter the quality of the tone produced. Keyboards have settings like “jazz organ,”“church organ,” or “chapel organ,” which do not allow for any on-the-spot tonal alteration. Organs have a pedalboard, with which bass and sometimes melodies are played with the feet. Keyboards have nothing except perhaps a sustain pedal. In short, organ repertoire cannot be played on a keyboard, and replacing an older organ with one is always a poor decision.
Thankyou. That’s very interesting. In other threads we have discussed the need to encourage more people to learn to play the organ, and to encourage organists to play. My opinion is that the organist is the most valuable person there, apart from the priest, and that we should be paying them in order to show that we appreciate their services, and to encourage others to come forward.

The way things are going we won’t have an organist at 95% of Masses in 10 years time.

A well played keyboard or guitar can certainly be used to lead congregational singing, and it is a LOT better than no music at all, or some of the alternatives…, but nothing compares to the organ.
 
Just a note about “the keyboard set to ‘organ’.” An electronic keyboard is NOT an organ, regardless of how authentically it reproduces one. It saddens me to see parishes where an old or broken organ is replaced by a keyboard. They are as different from one another as a guitar is from a violin. Organs have manuals which resemble a keyboard or piano, but there are 61 keys, not 88, and they aren’t weighted like a piano. Organs normally have two or more manuals as well as stops to alter the quality of the tone produced. Keyboards have settings like “jazz organ,”“church organ,” or “chapel organ,” which do not allow for any on-the-spot tonal alteration. Organs have a pedalboard, with which bass and sometimes melodies are played with the feet. Keyboards have nothing except perhaps a sustain pedal. In short, organ repertoire cannot be played on a keyboard, and replacing an older organ with one is always a poor decision.
I think the reason why keyboards are chosen instead of organs or pianos is the cost.

Even a cheap electronic organ will cost at least twenty thousand dollars. I have a twenty-year-old organ in my home, a gift from my brother, that cost only thirty-five hundred dollars.

A pipe organ will cost much, much more, around seventy-thousand.

A good piano will cost at least five thousand dollars, and more for a grand, which is the best choice for a large hall (the nave).

Maintaining a pipe organ or an electronic organ is quite costly and a never-ending task.

Same for a piano. Most acoustic pianos in churches or halls must be given a “drink” of water throughout the week or they will go bad.

But a good keyboard is so cheap and so easy to maintain.

I think a lot of pastors and their parishes struggle with their consciences and eventually make the decision that the seventy-thousand or twenty-thousand or five thousand dollars plus maintenance monies would be better spent elsewhere. I think it would be awfully difficult to drive by the local rescue mission or half-way house and think, “We could have done so much for these poor people–did we really need that pipe organ?”

After all, the Lord Jesus actually commanded us to take care of the poor, but never did He specify “pipe organ” instead of “keyboard.” 🙂

And then consider how few people actually know how to play the pipe organ, electronic organ, or piano well. In many parishes, the pipe organ languishes under dust, because there is no one available to play it. This must make it even harder for the pastor or the people to drive by that rescue mission.

Don’t get the wrong idea–I love the pipe organ, and I’ve been taking lessons for two and half years now (primarily due to the influence of CAF!). I still can’t play it well enough to play in church, but I play the piano very well and I DO play that in church whenever I am needed. I would love to see a revival of interest in pipe organ, and a crowd of children rushing to sign up for lessons! But honestly, in my heart of hearts, I don’t think it’s likely to happen. I think that most parishes, other than the big city parishes near universities, will eventually not hear the organ very often once their current organists have passed on. Sigh. 😦
 
I find these threads on catholic music hilarious.

After being in mega Evangelical a Churches with full orchestras or 10 piece rock bands with light shows and big screen TV’s, even the most contemporary Catholic music seems traditional to me!
exactly.
 
So when the organ was broken, Silent Night was written for guitar to be played in it’s place.
I guess based on what some are posting here, that guitar song should have never seen the light of day at a Christmas Mass.
The guidelines quoted can be interpreted in a number of ways. There are bigger problems on our hands that if some drum was used with other instruments at Mass. This is just a matter of taste.
 
40.png
robwar:
So when the organ was broken, Silent Night was written for guitar to be played in it’s place.
I guess based on what some are posting here, that guitar song should have never seen the light of day at a Christmas Mass.
The guidelines quoted can be interpreted in a number of ways. There are bigger problems on our hands that if some drum was used with other instruments at Mass. This is just a matter of taste.
However even with mandated attendance those little matter of taste will determine the exact location where one attends. For some it will mean driving away to reach an area where the 1906 cultural norm is not enforced.

Posted from Catholic.com App for Android
 
Pipe organs generally only require tuning annually, which can cost a few hundred dollars depending on the size of the organ. Electronic organs might require service every ten years or so. I once bought a 30 year old Allen organ from a Mormon church for $400 which was in perfect working shape. Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

Regarding “Silent Night,” the guitar was only used because the organ was broken. To this day, many German and Austrian parishes still play it on guitars and zithers. However, pipe organs are found in even the smallest chapels in those countries and remain the primary instrument for use at Mass. Electronic organs are generally only used until funds have been raised for a pipe organ, after which they become practice instruments.
 
…For some it will mean driving away to reach an area where the 1906 cultural norm is not enforced.
Is this a typo, or did you really mean “not enforced”? As it is the norm not to enforce the 1906 (or 1958,… or 1968) regulations, one usually doesn’t have to travel far to find a parish which suits. On the other hand, it’s the people who want traditional music (and liturgy) who have to travel.

Even so, lovers of traditional music should be aware that there are many Catholics who actively dislike it. Even amongst daily Mass goers and older Catholics there are many who react adversely to popular traditional hymns, such as How Great Thou Art, let alone more “high brow” hymns such as Ave Verum Corpus or Come Down O Love Divine.

It never ceases to surprise and discourage me. 😦

There are also some who love such music, and miss it terribly… yet our voices don’t seem to matter.

In my own parish, I have heard the following hymns only once in the last five years:* Firmly I Believe and Truly,* and Soul of My Saviour. Both times were when I had an opportunity to prepare the hymn list, and just went ahead and did what I wanted. Some parishioners responded enthusiastically, but the “powers” disapproved.
 
Dave,

I recall many years ago, hearing “morning has broken” at a folk mass at my future wife’s parish. I completely lost my train of thought. I couldn’t help but wonder if the acoustic guitarist would segue into moon shadow next. Or maybe play some Van Morrison?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Has_Broken
“Morning Has Broken” is a popular and well-known Christian hymn first published in 1931. It has words by English author Eleanor Farjeon and is set to a traditional Gaelic tune known as “Bunessan” (it shares this tune with the 19th century Christmas Carol “Child in the Manger”).The hymn originally appeared in the second edition of Songs of Praise (published in 1931), to the tune “Bunessan”, composed in the Scottish Highlands. In Songs of Praise Discussed, the editor, Percy Dearmer, explains that as there was need for a hymn to give thanks for each day, English poet and children’s author Eleanor Farjeon had been “asked to make a poem to fit the lovely Scottish tune”. A slight variation on the original hymn, also written by Eleanor Farjeon, can be found in the form of a poem contributed to the anthology Children’s Bells, under Farjeon’s new title, “A Morning Song (For the First Day of Spring)”, published by Oxford University Press in 1957.
“Bunessan” had been found in L. McBean’s Songs and Hymns of the Gael, published in 1900.Before Farjeon’s words, the tune was used as a Christmas carol, which began “Child in the manger, Infant of Mary”, translated from the Scottish Gaelic lyrics written by Mary MacDonald. The English-language Roman Catholic hymnal also uses the tune for the Charles Stanford hymns “Christ Be Beside Me” and “This Day God Gives Me”, both of which were adapted from the traditional Irish hymn St. Patrick’s Breastplate. Another Christian hymn “Baptized In Water” borrows the tune.
 
Thank you for the clarification. I thought it was a Christian hymn. I don’t use it myself, by I do use the Breastplate sometimes.
Even so, lovers of traditional music should be aware that there are many Catholics who actively dislike it. Even amongst daily Mass goers and older Catholics there are many who react adversely to popular traditional hymns, such as How Great Thou Art, let alone more “high brow” hymns such as Ave Verum Corpus or Come Down O Love Divine
Nice post.

I do not think any particular music is a problem as long as it is not an immersion in one thing, at least for the average parishioner. When visiting, the only time I come away disappointed in the music is when it is all one thing or another. I can see why folks get sick and tired of contemporary music (we all know the composers) when that seems to be all they hear week in/week out. I only mention that because I think that is the most common form of one-note music today. I do not think a few people disliking some songs that are more “high brow,” as you say, would be an issue unless that is all they hear.

I really do believe variety is the key for most parishioners. For me, that means almost all new music I have introduced has been on the more traditional side to help keep the balance even, as we had pretty much sunk into a one genre slump. It seems to be working over the years pretty well. I wish we didn’t have to rely so heavily on guitars. Over the years we have had two pianists that have come and gone. We just don’t have the talent in our parish, at least that is willing to play.
 
A poem by Eleanor Farjeon. The music from a traditional Bunessan-Gaelic melody. And your point being?
I believe the point was that the expectation of hearing something totally secular based on hearing “Morning Has Broken” seems forced. It would be like, “I heard* How Great Thou Art* at Mass. I kept thinking Achy Breaky Heart would be next.” It seems somewhat disconnected.
 
Oh dear.
Does anyone know that hymns are a 3rd or 4th choice for most points in the Mass when they are used? We’re supposed to be hearing “the propers”, which are chants (yes, chants, GASP) set to music by the church.
It’s kind of like not doing the prescribed prayers for the day, because the priest likes something else (maybe “The Shack”, or Dr. Seuss, etc.)
Also, in terms of instruments, I like to imagine if a beautiful painting of Renaissance angels would include, say, electric guitar, or bongos. No. Voices, a small portative organ, string instruments, yes.
 
I believe the point was that the expectation of hearing something totally secular based on hearing “Morning Has Broken” seems forced.
Ah. My point being connotation.

I was trying to share this in simple terms highlighting the instrumentation used and the song selection from the folk Mass from a parish (mid 1980’s). At that point of time, in that place within that culture, that song was associated with the cool tracks from Cat Stevens. In the same way another folk song often sung at Mass – the Pete Seeger song, "Turn! Turn! Turn! (to Everything There Is a Season) was tied to the Byrds’.

I would agree that this does go beyond some peoples overall outlook on liturgical settings.
 
as one of my teachers likes to say what does it say in the girm or other juridical document say.

note just because some pope in 1906 said something about pianos or other instruments in mass doesn’t mean that we must agree with what he said. It is possible that doctrine develops that would allow pianos and other instruments (other than organ) in mass.
Small point…
This sort of discussion is not about doctrine. It’s about culture, taste, Church discipline, but not doctrine. The tone of the liturgy in any particular culture, and the use of instruments and music, changes with times and cultures. But the substance of the liturgy does not.
 
Oh dear.
Does anyone know that hymns are a 3rd or 4th choice for most points in the Mass when they are used? We’re supposed to be hearing “the propers”, which are chants (yes, chants, GASP) set to music by the church.
Yes, I know of the ranking, but the Church does not use the word “supposed”. Bishops can do as they think best.
It’s kind of like not doing the prescribed prayers for the day, because the priest likes something else (maybe “The Shack”, or Dr. Seuss, etc.)
It is not like that at all, because hymns are a legitimate option, unless you are referring to private devotional prayers, then it is like that, say, using some “seussian” Marian prayer instead of Hail Mary, which would be fine.
 
Small point…
This sort of discussion is not about doctrine. It’s about culture, taste, Church discipline, but not doctrine. The tone of the liturgy in any particular culture, and the use of instruments and music, changes with times and cultures. But the substance of the liturgy does not.
yes you are correct thank you my mistake
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top