T
tjm190
Guest
Kind meaning species?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
B
buffalo
Guest
Genetics are increasingly supporting the kinds. Stay tuned.“Kind” is scientifically nonsensical. It was invented by “creation scientists” in the past forty years.
B
buffalo
Guest
Give it your best guess.Dunno. Why you ask?
S
StAnastasia
Guest
Mt. Everest itself is only five million years old, and is being eroded almost as fast as it is being thrust up. But that’s a lot older than Noah’s Flood. The fossil-bearing rocks on the summit of Everest are around 60 million years old, much much older than the supposed flood. You YECs are absolutely hopeless at history, or geology, or biblical interpretation, or honesty.Give it your best guess.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
You know nothing of genetics.Genetics are increasingly supporting the kinds. Stay tuned.
Z
Zundrah
Guest
How is that a response?You know nothing of genetics.
Ah, I see, so God is God but he is not God Almighty? Everything is impossible for him is it? You my friend are an athiest in the making.A process which requires thousands of years, at which point the island is far from capable of supporting life.
How often has science been found wrong? Their dates are their worst estimates.Mt. Everest is not volcanic. It’s been 29,035 feet high since long before Noah’s Flood.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
Probably as often as religion has been found wrong. Scientific knowledge is provisional,How often has science been found wrong? Their dates are their worst estimates.
Z
Zundrah
Guest
In that case you should remove “catholic” from your title and put agnostic ther instead. Pretty much every living human (before science was even dreamed of) believed exactly what the bible said.Probably as often as religion has been found wrong. Scientific knowledge is provisional,
T
tjm190
Guest
So you admit the only way one can hold a consistent world view that involved a flood would be to assume God just sorta came around and made it look as if there was no flood?Ah, I see, so God is God but he is not God Almighty? Everything is impossible for him is it? You my friend are an athiest in the making.
Z
Zundrah
Guest
There is evidence for the flood and there is evidence against it how ever there has not been a n agreemnet to either side as such yet.So you admit the only way one can hold a consistent world view that involved a flood would be to assume God just sorta came around and made it look as if there was no flood?
P.S. The gospel can be scientifically proven as false too since you love science so much. An example would be this; it is scientifically impossible for a dead body to come back to life four days after death as Lazarus supposedly did. John chapter eleven verse thirty eight.
T
tjm190
Guest
Because a man rising from the dead is on par with the insertion of thousands of species, removal of trillions of gallons of water, undoing of erosion, and insertion of habitable land is on par with Lazarus? In any event, the exclusion of these events would be an enormous lie of omission.There is evidence for the flood and there is evidence against it how ever there has not been a n agreemnet to either side as such yet.
P.S. The gospel can be scientifically proven as false too since you love science so much. An example would be this; it is scientifically impossible for a dead body to come back to life four days after death as Lazarus supposedly did. John chapter eleven verse thirty eight.
C
Calliso
Guest
Exactly especially when you think how creationists think macro evolution over millions of years isn;t possible. Yet somehow seem to have no problem with major changes like the one you mentioned happening over just a few thousand years. It;s mindboggling.Again, the supposition that some mammal from the ark or a fresh water fist could transition to saltwater only creature in a mere few thousand years is quite ridiculous, no matter how you phrase it.
C
Calliso
Guest
Oh and I am still wondering as I am sure others are too What exactly kinds are? And how genetics supports these mysterious kinds.
Z
Zundrah
Guest
Okay, so explain to me how five loaves of bread etc can be scientifically shared out to thousands of people. Then maybe we can come to an agreement. And while we are still on science I guess it was a tornado that took Christs body up to heaven?Because a man rising from the dead is on par with the insertion of thousands of species, removal of trillions of gallons of water, undoing of erosion, and insertion of habitable land is on par with Lazarus? In any event, the exclusion of these events would be an enormous lie of omission.
Z
Zundrah
Guest
Why not ask God. But then again you will probably tell him that his answer is unscientific (as is talking to a God, anyway).Oh and I am still wondering as I am sure others are too What exactly kinds are? And how genetics supports these mysterious kinds.
T
tjm190
Guest
Would you care to respond to my prior post in the slightest? Why would the Bible fail to inform us about all of the repair work God did after the flood?Okay, so explain to me how five loaves of bread etc can be scientifically shared out to thousands of people. Then maybe we can come to an agreement. And while we are still on science I guess it was a tornado that took Christs body up to heaven?
Z
Zundrah
Guest
Yes because they are both far’fetched.Because a man rising from the dead is on par with the insertion of thousands of species, removal of trillions of gallons of water, undoing of erosion, and insertion of habitable land is on par with Lazarus? .
He removed the water so that we may live on land again. Simple. …unless of course he wanted us to evolve into fish.In any event, the exclusion of these events would be an enormous lie of omission.
T
tjm190
Guest
One is relatively small in scale and well documented- the other would be the second biggest instance of divine intervention, with creation being first, and not mentioned in the slightest.Yes because they are both far’fetched.
And the other things I brought up? Why not mention those?He removed the water so that we may live on land again. Simple. …unless of course he wanted us to evolve into fish.
R
rossum
Guest
How many new species is that every year? What evidence do you have of that number of new species appearing currently?It is scientifically possible.
rossum
Z
Zundrah
Guest
Well why not? It seems fine to me. What’s wrong with it?One is relatively small in scale and well documented- the other would be the second biggest instance of divine intervention, with creation being first, and not mentioned in the slightest.
Show them to me. I am trying to keep up with many threads at the moment.And the other things I brought up? Why not mention those?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.