S
SirThomasMore
Guest
lolololol'I’m sorry? All I heard was, “blah blah blah, I’m a dirty tramp.” ’
:curtsey:
(“Mr Deeds”, 2002)
lolololol'I’m sorry? All I heard was, “blah blah blah, I’m a dirty tramp.” ’
:curtsey:
(“Mr Deeds”, 2002)
The question is: were the catholics and protestants behaving like christians in Europe, asia, africa, america etc. I have already brought up the religious wars that engulfed europe for years and years. Catholics and protestants killing each other in the name of god. I am sure that god was not too pleased with that. How many innocent people were killed?"Both Catholics and Protestants are nothing less than the “whore of Babylon” whom the Lord denounces… as having corrupted all the earth by their fornications and wickedness. And any person who shall be so wicked as to receive a holy ordinance of the gospel from the ministers of any of these apostate churches will be sent down to hell with them, unless they repent of the unholy and impious act. If any penitent believer desires to obtain forgiveness of sins through baptism, let him beware of having any thing to do with the churches of apostate Christendom, lest he perish in the awful plagues and judgments, denounced against them. The only persons among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people who have authority from Jesus Christ to administer any gospel ordinance are those called and authorized among the Latter-day Saints. Before the restoration of the church of Christ to the earth in the year 1830, there have been no people on the earth for many generations possessing authority from God to minister gospelordinances. We again repeat. Beware of the hypocritical false teachers and imposters of Babylon! - Apostle Orson Pratt The Seer, Vol.2, No.4, p.255
And so, there was a restoration of the gospel according to the mormons. But the question still remains: Was christianity lacking charity in its history as it delt with difference? There was a lot of bloodshed in europe and among the colonies as native populations were forced to convert. Or as in europe where different christians killed each other for no reason at all. And then of course we have the political corruption and intrigues throughout christian europe. Could god have been a little disappointed with churches doing such things in his name?“The Roman Catholic, Greek, and Protestant church is the great corrupt ecclesiastic power, represented by great Babylon which has made all nations drunk with her wickedness, and she must fall, after she has been warned with the sound of the everlasting gospel. Her overthrow will be by a series of the most terrible judgments which will quickly succeed each other, and sweep over the nations where she has her dominion, and at last she will be utterly burned by fire, for thus hath the Lord spoken. Great, and fearful, and most terrible judgments are decreed upon these corrupt powers, the nations of modern Christendom; for strong is the Lord God who shall execute His fierce wrath upon them, and He will not cease until He has made a full end, and until their names be blotted out from under heaven.” - Apostle Orson Pratt, Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon, p.84 - p.85
Dunno. I did not live in that timeframe to see what was going on and why. I am surprised that you did live back then and can question the ethics of a different era and country. I am envious.The question is: were the catholics and protestants behaving like christians in Europe, asia, africa, america etc. I have already brought up the religious wars that engulfed europe for years and years. Catholics and protestants killing each other in the name of god. I am sure that god was not too pleased with that. How many innocent people were killed?
Then of course we have religious intolerance in europe where religious groups were persecuted for believing diffiferent. Not to mention what happened to the indians by god fearing whites who went to church on sunday and killed indians during the week. I am sure that god was not to happy about that too. A lot of crimes were commited in the name of god. See my point?
I posted the sources and even the pages. I would expect that, should you have questions about what came before and after, you would look it up. But that is ok, I really don;t expect anything betterOf course posting quotations from second hand sources is wonderful, especially when we can not see what came before or after the quote. We seem to thrive on lacking context. But that is okay. I really don’t expect anything better.![]()
Maybe. After all,m many wars were fought in the OT in God’s name. But, again, since you were apparently there (based on your willingness to judge an entirely different epoc and culture), you tell meAnd so, there was a restoration of the gospel according to the mormons. But the question still remains: Was christianity lacking charity in its history as it delt with difference? There was a lot of bloodshed in europe and among the colonies as native populations were forced to convert. Or as in europe where different christians killed each other for no reason at all. And then of course we have the political corruption and intrigues throughout christian europe. Could god have been a little disappointed with churches doing such things in his name?
You know, I do see your point. And I daresay Benedict XVI sees your point too! Christ predicted that sins would be committed by members of the Church, but promised that the Church would remain on earth in spite of that:The question is: were the catholics and protestants behaving like christians in Europe, asia, africa, america etc. I have already brought up the religious wars that engulfed europe for years and years. Catholics and protestants killing each other in the name of god. I am sure that god was not too pleased with that. How many innocent people were killed?
Then of course we have religious intolerance in europe where religious groups were persecuted for believing diffiferent. Not to mention what happened to the indians by god fearing whites who went to church on sunday and killed indians during the week. I am sure that god was not to happy about that too. A lot of crimes were commited in the name of god. See my point?
Whether or not, christ promised that the church would remain on earth is a matter of interpretation of which many protestant sects would disagree with you. I think that when one looks at christian history and see the political intrigues and how these political intrigues led to corruption, war and death, one can speculate that god was not too pleased. And so, the question is: did the protestant and catholic church lead with the hearts of men and not with the heart of god? And if the christian church lead with the hearts of men, it would be in apostacy.You know, I do see your point. And I daresay Benedict XVI sees your point too! Christ predicted that sins would be committed by members of the Church, but promised that the Church would remain on earth in spite of that:
In any era, no matter when, when sins were committed by Christians you will find others in the Church who recognize and seek to correct those errors. We believe that there will be both wheat and tares in the Church. We also believe, that for the sake of the wheat, God will not take the Church from the earth even when the chaff seem to dominate. That is what this parable teaches. The Church can fully acknowledge the sins of its members - indeed it must, since it is part of the Church’s duty to call sinners to repentance. But Christ here is warning us against accepting the very assumption you are making - that the presence of sinners in the Church indicates and absence of holiness from the Church as a whole. If that were the case, then Christ’s parable would be untrue, and his promises defeated.
And this is where the human imagination plays its role. I wouldn’t say that it was hatred but it was a warning. But the point still remains: were they correct? It is easy to paste and post quotations without context, but was what they said true?Dunno. I did not live in that timeframe to see what was going on and why. I am surprised that you did live back then and can question the ethics of a different era and country. I am envious.
The point is, the hatred shown by LDS leaders is scary.
You can read all about it in the history books. Use your imagination by seeing yourself there at that time as you read the history and ask yourself what would you have done? Kill protestants because they were protestants because the king or queen said so for the good of the faith?Maybe. After all,m many wars were fought in the OT in God’s name. But, again, since you were apparently there (based on your willingness to judge an entirely different epoc and culture), you tell me