M
MelanieAnne
Guest
Lax, I would venture a guess that when the LDS church divided after the death of Joseph Smith, as well as further division subsequent to that, the current LDS church would describe themselves as the “true” church, whereas the RLDS, FLDS, etc. would be the “apostates”. I doubt that any LDS would use the word “orthodox” to describe themselves but in some sense that would be their status. Of course the broken-away LDS sects have the same opinion of their own groups.
Apostasy may result in division, just as you have defined it. But the ones that break off are often considered the “apostates”, not the church they broke away FROM. At least by those they broke away from. LDS would no doubt argue that the fact that apostates broke away says nothing about the truthfulness of their own faith.
Of course these broken away former LDS are in good company since according to the LDS church the entire Christian world is “apostate”.
Apostasy may result in division, just as you have defined it. But the ones that break off are often considered the “apostates”, not the church they broke away FROM. At least by those they broke away from. LDS would no doubt argue that the fact that apostates broke away says nothing about the truthfulness of their own faith.
Of course these broken away former LDS are in good company since according to the LDS church the entire Christian world is “apostate”.