From the article.Read the article.
We strive to worship, honour and obey our Lord, we give thanks for all the good things that he does for us. Justice for the poor and oppressed is one way in which we bring glory to God.What is the Lord saying? Many things to be sure, but let me suggest this essential teaching: Nothing, absolutely nothing, not even the service of the poor, takes precedence over the worship, honor, and obedience due to God. Nothing. If the service of the poor takes precedence over this, then it becomes an idol—an idol in sheep’s clothing—but an idol nonetheless.
In the parallel passage in Mark, the apocalyptic discourse does not carry the same message. Matthew included it for a reason. In both gospels, the discourse is followed immediately by the story of the woman anointing Jesus. Mt 25 is the context for Mt 26:6-11, at least for the author of this gospel.Mathew 25 clearly says, what you do for the hungry, homeless the sick and the prisoner, so you do to me.
These sound like opposites of one another. Both principles must be held together, not set against one another as the linked blog from @po18guy portrays it. I honestly do not know how to do that, but it is obvious both were important to the evangelist.whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me. Mt 25:40.
The poor you will always have with you; but you will not always have me. Mt 26:8.
Jesus’ prophecy about the woman is also a prophecy about the evangelizing mission he gives to the Church at the close of the gospel. These three episodes say something profound about Jesus: in the least brothers whom you will always have with you, I am with you.wherever this gospel is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will be spoken of, in memory of her. Mt 26:11
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.
And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age.
Mt 28:19-20
It’s always good to keep dialogue going… even if it doesn’t seem to our understanding to be productive at the time. It also can keep Catholics, Catholic by constantly giving information and giving answers to questions that continuously come upMuch has been said and written about interreligious dialogue and ecumenism as they pertain to non-Christian and Christian groups respectively. What is the purpose of this dialogue if it does not lead ultimately to conversion of non-Catholics and to saving of souls?
Of course we do not have to deny our faith to dialogue with others.Denying your own faith can not be the goal of interfaith dialogues.