H
Hope1960
Guest
I know, and I’m trying to find out which one is true, for sure. Like I said, some Protestants say Catholicism is just made up by men.Two opposite things cannot be true.
I know, and I’m trying to find out which one is true, for sure. Like I said, some Protestants say Catholicism is just made up by men.Two opposite things cannot be true.
I just listened to Tim Staples on CAF Live who said that there were schisms before Luther, though none like what happened after Luther split from the CC.Let history speak for itself. The writings exist all the way back.
The moderator told me she fixed it. It had a timer on it for some reason.The closing in x number of hours is gone now, Hope.
When my grandparents were still alive, but were elderly and infirm, I used to go visit them. It was boring. I mean, boring!!!I just find Mass and (my parish) boring.
They bring up the rare ones that have soft tissue still inside the bones and say that proves the fossils are young.There are fossils that prove them wrong.
I have a couple thay I use as paper weights.
The Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC is filled with them.
I don’t know. I guess it depends on if God created them fully formed or if they evolved like Ed Feser proposes, where they evolved and a God gave Adam and Eve a soul.Did Adam and Even have navels? Because if so, someone could use their navels as proof that they had been born as infants, when in fact they hadn’t been. God may just have created them fully formed as if they had.
Or to put it another way. Sure Adam and Eve are about 20 years old today, but did they even exist yesterday?
Scientists now know why the minuscule amounts of soft tissue survived and it isn’t because the are less than ten thousand years old. The heme from hemoglobin releases iron micro particles which produce free radicals that bind and rearrange to act like formaldehyde which preserves the surrounding small tissue fragments. For over three hundred years, no one looked for these tissue remnants because it was assumed that the organic tissues wouldn’t survive and you don’t look for things if you assume they aren’t there!They bring up the rare ones that have soft tissue still inside the bones and say that proves the fossils are young.
Thanks! And there’s probably answers for all sorts of mysteries they think point to YEC. They just haven’t discovered the answers yet.Scientists now know why the minuscule amounts of soft tissue survived and it isn’t because the are less than ten thousand years old. The heme from hemoglobin releases iron micro particles which produce free radicals that bind and rearrange to act like formaldehyde which preserves the surrounding small tissue fragments. For over three hundred years, no one looked for these tissue remnants because it was assumed that the organic tissues wouldn’t survive and you don’t look for things if you assume they aren’t there!
Dr. Mary Schweitzer Was the scientist that first noticed and investigated the discovery and she was extremely upset that creationists made assumptions about this discovery that weren’t true…including that it wasn’t red blood cells…it was remnants from red blood cells. She is a practicing Christian but is not a creationist. Now, since scientists have discovered more instances of these soft tissue remnants…because they now know to look for them…they have solved the puzzle of how it happens and why it survives for millions of years. Chemistry all the way.
I might’ve read it but I might be thinking about Rome Sweet Home.Have you ever read Scott Hahn’s The Lamb’s Supper?https://www.amazon.com/Lambs-Supper-Mass-Heaven-Earth/dp/0385496591
The visual of what is actually taking place during Mass is absolutely breathtaking! It might change your mind!
More likely they discover the answers they don’t want so ignore them and search for the answers they hope validate their view…and can’t find them.They
I found something on Wikipedia that listed all these scientists who were creationists and thought there were a lot. Then as I started reading I found that virtually all of them were disrespected and or quacks in their respective fields.Dr. Mary Schweitzer Was the scientist that first noticed and investigated the discovery and she was extremely upset that creationists made assumptions about this discovery that weren’t true…including that it wasn’t red blood cells…it was remnants from red blood cells. She is a practicing Christian but is not a creationist.
Hmmm, I wonder why?The Lutheran sub forum is peaceful but the Catholic sub forum is brutal.