X
Xpat
Guest
I would like to know where/when this expression first came into use in the context of no salvation outside the church. Can someone help a brotha out?
Thanks for the link mom of ten. It seems that those who support the “you must be an actual member of the RC Church” forget to mention those pre-VC II Church statements that mention invincible ignorance.I believe the following site will help you.
Remember, that “no Salvation outside the Church” refers to those who KNOW the Truth of the True Church and reject it…NOT to those, who by no fault of their own, do NOT know the Truth of the True Church.
Anyway, visit here…I think it will better explain:
ewtn.com/expert/answers/outside_the_church.htm
I wouldnt agree totally with that. there might only be a tiny remnant who haven’t heard of jesus, but there are probably ALOT more who have heard of his name, but not the relevance of his existence.That said, I believe that only a tiny remnant of the world’s population could qualify as invincible ignorant.
Precisely this was a MAJOR part of the Lord’s Agony in the Garden.That said, I believe that only a tiny remnant of the world’s population could qualify as invincible ignorant.
What if I believe that membership to the RCC is NOT neccessary.Remember, that “no Salvation outside the Church” refers to those who KNOW the Truth of the True Church and reject it…NOT to those, who by no fault of their own, do NOT know the Truth of the True Church.
That reminds me of a joke told to me by a very devout Catholic.That said, I believe that only a tiny remnant of the world’s population could qualify as invincible ignorant.
No, there really is such a thing as “invincible ignorance”. If you doubt it, go find an SDA and try discussing logic, philosophy or history.There is no “Invincible Ignorance” it is just something that is made up by the church.
It’s just another example of those non-answers for awkward questions.
So, those who dont believe the claims of the RCC are seen to invincibly ignorant?No, there really is such a thing as “invincible ignorance”. If you doubt it, go find an SDA and try discussing logic, philosophy or history.
I don’t know who came up with this silly idea about “invincible ignorance” but whoever it was, must have been rather ignorant as well. It is unfortunate that anyone would teach that outside of Rome there is no salvation, and inexcusable for anyone to believe it. If I ever needed ONE good reason to think that the religion of Rome is nothing but a cult, this is it.I would like to know where/when this expression first came into use in the context of no salvation outside the church. Can someone help a brotha out?
No, that is not what I said. Notice that I specifically mentioned history, philosophy and logic. If you choose not to believe the claims of the RCC that is your right and the result of free will. If, on the other hand, you are incapable of believing not as a matter of personal choice but as the result of life long brainwashing that is invincible ignorance.So, those who dont believe the claims of the RCC are seen to invincibly ignorant?
Why is there? Is it because the catholic church tells you so?No, there really is such a thing as “invincible ignorance”.
What would they say?If you doubt it, go find an SDA and try discussing logic, philosophy or history.
When your final authority is NOT the scripture, the only thing you can say is “because the church tells you so”.Why is there? Is it because the catholic church tells you so?
It seems to me that there is a lot of: "because the catholic church says so" around here, and nobody appears to find that suspiciously convenient.
What would they say?
Yes but the church is run by people and people make mistakes.When your final authority is NOT the scripture, the only thing you can say is “because the church tells you so”.