Is Amazon Too Big?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThinkingSapien
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

ThinkingSapien

Guest
Not really news, but I thought it was interesting. While the video title names Amazon it talks a lot about the difference in economic strategies that are used by technology companies vs some of the traditional companies that they compete with.

 
Amazon is big enough. Big enough that it could make a difference in the lives of persons and give back a little to the persons that bought into it, buy from it, and have made it what it is a today, a Giant.

After Amazons break up with New York, seems to me they could have moved some business to a poorer state, and start up what they’ve been missing. Forget coal and all the backward progress…Why not take their high tech savvy and start up an area desperate for economical comeback through “updating” and where the rest of the country is at this time, the tech fields.

Jobs, jobs, jobs…they should have because they could have but won’t.
 
After Amazons break up with New York, seems to me they could have moved some business to a poorer state, and start up what they’ve been missing.
It might be easier to move some business functions than others. I don’t know what business functions that they intended for the new secondary headquarters. My understanding is that some poorer areas also have less Internet infrastructure already in place. They may also have less business services or services in which employees potential employees would have interest.

That said, I could see moving some business functions to an area and that being a catalyst for an area being built up. But on the flip side of that as demand to be in the area increases other people within the community could find their expenses and taxes going up and getting priced out of an area that had otherwise been affordable to them (gentrification). This was one of the things that some people in New York were protesting against.

I’m not saying that moving or not moving is right or wrong. But I am saying that the impacts of such a move may be complex.
 
I see your point which is logical and thought out especially about the infrastructure, yet not quite sure how many persons don’t yet have access to the internet or still own a flip top. I see a lot of these faces that I had considered rather insulated on CNN as of lately, complaining about the tariffs…but not to change the subject, you make a good point!~

One of my favorite late night talk comedians mentioned this though and in his dialogue said they company is worth billions and could afford to “take one for the team”…A lot of the places want to be “invited to the party”…let your imagination work with that…Moving high tech into an area otherwise deprived of updated jobs are going to be moved into that direction one way or the other and I personally see them doing it happily. Unemployment and/or waiting for a black hole to reopen has got to get old.
 
Seems like nowadays if you’re willing to drive, there will always be a job for you.
 
Amazon is big enough. Big enough that it could make a difference in the lives of persons and give back a little to the persons that bought into it, buy from it, and have made it what it is a today, a Giant.

After Amazons break up with New York, seems to me they could have moved some business to a poorer state, and start up what they’ve been missing. Forget coal and all the backward progress…Why not take their high tech savvy and start up an area desperate for economical comeback through “updating” and where the rest of the country is at this time, the tech fields.

Jobs, jobs, jobs…they should have because they could have but won’t.
They do give back, and their employees pay loads of taxes.

They also set up facilities where they can get the labor they need, facilities all across the USA and abroad


They don’t pay loads is profit taxes though because they have a profit margin of 3-6%, good for retail but low compared to many other industries.
 
They don’t pay loads is profit taxes though because they have a profit margin of 3-6%, good for retail but low compared to many other industries.
The video above kind of talked about that. I hadn’t realized that their profit margins are so low! But when you move enough products and services a small margin can still be a lot of money. Per the video above their retail business is subsidized by their web services business. Traditional retail and grocery stores don’t usually have another unrelated business to finance their operations.
 
Imagine if Sears and Roebuck had gone back to their early days and the “catalog” was a website and - take it from there! It could still happen - we need competition and quality products. How about something that can be repaired instead of thrown out? Nice idea?
 
They also set up facilities where they can get the labor they need, facilities all across the USA and abroad
I looked at your list from the link, other than 4 different locations in CA not one location set up shop in at least one of the 10 poorest States within our country.

Not one.

That was the point.

edited for…yes, it’s too big.
 
Last edited:
I looked at your list from the link, other than 4 different locations in CA not one location set up shop in at least one of the 10 poorest States within our country.

Not one.

That was the point.

edited for…yes, it’s too big.
who are these poorest states?
The bottom ten list i found included Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, all of which have Amazon facilities.

You have a socialist mindset if you want to force businesses to set up shop in bad locations.
 
I think it’s too big to not care. It could afford the state of Mississippi if it wanted, instead they wanted to court NY for their branding enterprise…Yes I think they’re too big. Sue me. Send the subpoena, I won’t show. ciao’
 
Imagine if Sears and Roebuck had gone back to their early days and the “catalog” was a website and - take it from there!
I don’t know if that would be enough. Amazon is making a substantial amount of money on IT services that contributes to them being able to keep prices on their consumer products lower and finance them them expanding their business (getting into groceries, performing a lot of their own logistics, integration of their consumer digital services into various goods, so on). They are a lot more than an online catalog of products to buy now.
They also set up facilities where they can get the labor they need, facilities all across the USA and abroad
That reminds me, Amazon has purchased the grounds of a few dead shopping malls.

 
Confusing warehouses and pick up locations as headquarters. YIKES…for the love of conglomerates, let us pray. For the love of education that brings knowledge, hear our Prayer.
 
I think it’s too big to not care. It could afford the state of Mississippi if it wanted, instead they wanted to court NY for their branding enterprise…Yes I think they’re too big. Sue me. Send the subpoena, I won’t show. ciao’
LOL, Mississippi doesn’t have the tech talent for staffing another Amazon HQ operation.
The board would likely fire Bezos if he started making such irrational decisions.

Bet you’d be fine with their size if they were Govt controlled though.
The Govt does everything better.
 
Sears operated when they were at their best with standing behind quality. Amazon has gotten full of “stuff” and much of what is purchased is junk. The customer can return IF the purchase allows for it to Amazon OR they must pursue the junk dealer. Shipping costs.
I do not know how Amazon acquires all the merchandise . I imagine a maker of goods contacts them to purchase space in their website and follows through with meeting their price and procedures. There is a statement that appears for those that Amazon does not offer customer satisfaction.
My point is that selecting items on Amazon has become an exhausting amount of review time and careful selection is best searched through the details. The website has numerous hiccups.
 
Sears operated when they were at their best with standing behind quality
People used to remind me that all the time. When I was in high school I had a job working at a local Sears. When I worked in the hardware department I remember older men coming in with a drill or a saw that they had owned for 10 to 20 years that had stopped working and wanted a free replacement. I had to tell them that it was out of warranty and that it could not be exchanged. That usually lead being told how far Sears had fallen from where they used to be. I worked in the computer department too. I also worked in the computer department. But as that was a commission position and they didn’t keep many computers in stock it wasn’t profitable and lead to me exiting.


I tried looking up why they got rid of the catalog department. The only definitive statement I found was on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia:
The cost of distributing the once highly influential general merchandise catalog became prohibitive; sales and profits had declined. The company discontinued the catalog in 1993. It dismissed 50,000 workers which filled the orders. This was before the internet became an effective tool. With the advantage of hindsight, the timing was poor; Sears already had in place what it took Amazon years to achieve.
Amazon was incorporated in 1994. It wasn’t until 1998 that they expanded from books and started to sell music and other media. In 2002 they got into technology services.
I do not know how Amazon acquires all the merchandise .
They also purchase products in bulk and brand them. And like many other retailers they purchase branded goods from manufacturers. There are also Amazon partners that sell their own goods through Amazon. I bought a telescope on Amazon and the order was fulfilled by B&H Photo in NYC.
I imagine a maker of goods contacts them to purchase space in their website and follows through with meeting their price and procedures.
Amazon sells advertisements. Many of those advertisements show up on other websites.
My point is that selecting items on Amazon has become an exhausting amount of review time and careful selection is best searched through the details. The website has numerous hiccups.
I find that I use my local retailers less because some of the things I want to buy they don’t keep in stock in the store. The display items are sometimes fake or behind locked cases where they can’t be touched. I can order the items through the store and get them in a few days. If I order through Amazon I can get them in one to two days. If I can’t see the product before I buy anyway I just end up ordering online.
 
Right, I do use Amazon (that’s why I know things are getting sloppy) - everything goes through cycles.
Competition is good for business - there must be somebody with the bucks that wants to jump in? Doesn’t have to be as huge as Amazon to get started - just more quality control, less junk. Maybe one big site that offers all the big box stores under one umbrella?
 
I think many if not most know what they want from Amazon. That could have been the same for the catalogs too but why have to call and wait a couple of weeks for your order? It’s all about convenience and timeliness.
 
The different between Amazon and Sears is Sears didn’t sell second-hand stuff.
As a thrifter and yard saler, I like being able to buy second hand books from Amazon, which Sears would never do.
I’ve also bought collectibles from Amazon, which Sears can’t do.
There’s also a kind of shoe I like that I can’t find in stores, but there’s always a seller on Amazon who carries it.
Also some skin care brands I can’t find consistently in stores.

You can’t really compare Sears and Amazon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top