R
rpp
Guest
This is a very interesting article on the New York Times web site.
The general consensus is that anti-Catholicism is alive and well.
Here are some excerpts
The general consensus is that anti-Catholicism is alive and well.
Here are some excerpts
When Gov. Alfred E. Smith ran for president in 1928, his candidacy was derailed in large part by anti-Catholic prejudice. It has been nearly 48 years since John F. Kennedy became the first (and so far only) Roman Catholic president, but experts say that anti-Catholic sentiment — much of it originating in, or as a response to, immigrants in New York — remains an enduring force in American culture.
{snip}
The next speaker, James P. McCartin, a historian at Seton Hall University, said that “anti-Catholicism in a sense is at the center of Western modern history,” emerging from the “crucible of violence and hatred” that characterized the religious wars of the 16th and 17th centuries. Among the major themes of anti-Catholic sentiment, he said, were a revulsion toward that violence; a “long memory of real and imagined Catholic oppression”; a persistent anti-clericalism; and a prurient interest in the sexuality of nuns and priests.
{snip}
The Rev. Richard John Neuhaus — a leading conservative intellectual, a former Lutheran pastor and the editor of the leading Catholic journal First Things — offered a surprising view on the question.
Full story here.“To be a Catholic is not to be refused positions of influence in our society,” he said. “Indeed, one of the most acceptable things is to be a bad Catholic, and in the view of many people, the only good Catholic is a bad Catholic.”