Is atheism a religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter someperson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m almost old enough to be your grandmother and find that word offensive.

I wouldn’t use that word in front of anyone’s name to show basic respect and civility. You believe respect and civility matter, right?

I don’t want you to get banned because I want to hear what you have to say and I’m interested in your POV.

I’m sure you’re a good hacker but wouldn’t you just come back in the same manner?
 
Last edited:
All of western civilization was nourished by Christianity. Art, music, learning, human dignity and equality, science.
Being a patron to the arts because you have the wealth to pay the artist does not mean that you promoted the conversation of the arts. Artists will create what ever they are payed to create by the people paying them. The reason the church held the wealth of the time to pay the artists is because they stamped out everyone else that stood in their way.
human dignity and equality
This is soo absurd for religion to claim that I’ll just leave it to understanding just how educated the audience is.
When has religion ever been ahead of the curve from secular society in human rights? It always has to be dragged into the current century its operating in when society starts to see it as irrelevant to the civil conversation.
And the theocracies of atheism and paganism lead the way in atrocities.
Atheist has nothing to do with moral systems. So wrong there.
There are governments, that are not theocratic, that do have body counts. However, they operated exactly the same as theocratic governments, just instead of a deity, they deified the government. They both played by the same barbaric play book. Heretic hunts, outlawing blasphemy, infallibility of the heads of state, fascist regimes, government controlled media, no freedom of speech or the press, promotion of “us vs them” tribalism, isolationist tribal purity, removal of rights to minorities, women, children, and people of the other tribe, and on and on. Yes these governments were not religious, but they definitely were not secular in practice at all. They were religious in practice though.
 
I don’t mind playing the bad cop here. You are correct. Username violates forum rules.
 
The Eagle has landed. (Hawk, I mean. Smaller perhaps, but with tricks up our sleeve nonetheless.)
 
Christianity respects all life, no matter the person’s faith. Doesn’t everyone know that?
It does now that it’s been updated through the secular process. The religion is no longer allowed to burn people at the stake for daring to own a bible in their own language. It is no longer allowed to take tribal children away from their families and force them into catholic schools. It is no longer allowed to be backed by military might of the government it operates in to spread its doctrine.
 
You are conflating Christian teaching with the actions of humans claiming to act in the name of Christianity.
 
Last edited:
Many Catholics oftentimes act in direct violation of the Church and very often are over-zealous in spreading the faith. Neither this forum, the Catholic Church, or I support any acts of killing or harming non-Catholics because we respect all human life immensely. In the past, there were many acts done by overly-eager Catholics that are sinful and contrary to the moral demands of natural law. They are culpable for their sins. Ultimately, we should agree that those acts are heinous but not use them as proof against the Church as Divinely-instituted. The Catholic Church does not claim moral impeccability for its members, after all.
 
Yes, very good points.

I want to know why the Catholic Church and Christianity are “all bad”.

Orphanages, soup kitchens, and the protection of all life are bad?
 
Last edited:
There is nothing in the teachings of the Catholic Church that support harming another human being under any circumstance.
 
Actually, it was founded by Christ the Son of God who gave the stewardship of His earthly Church to Simon Peter like we see in Matthew’s Gospel Chapter 16. When you reference blood what are you referring to? I do not deny that some members of the Catholic Church have murdered and done very heinous acts and they are responsible for those acts. Our Church, however, was given the promise of Christ that it would teach the Truth. Christ didn’t institute a sinless, impeccable Church. Rather, one full of sinners.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top